Skip to main content

Towards Re-theorizing the Firm in Pursuit of Well-Being and Social Justice

  • Chapter

Abstract

The recent global financial and economic crisis has prompted calls for more regulation of corporations, even a sort of nationalized capitalism. Moreover, increasing awareness and evidence of climate change caused by human activities also demand eco-sensitive regulation and international protocols. Both these concerns, together with the still ubiquitous poverty in our post-modern society, are challenging the sustainability of global capitalism in pursuit of wealth creation and profit maximization, and questioning the activities and behavior of firms in terms of responsibility, accountability, and the role of leadership. However, opponents of overregulation fear that it may lead to nationalism and protectionism and therefore stunt the innovation, free market enterprise, and competition that are conducive to economic prosperity. Moreover, they claim that overregulation imposes a huge cost of compliance on the state and ultimately on society. Against this background, this chapter attempts to show that we should rethink the purpose of the firm, not only from an economic perspective but also from a sociopolitical perspective to re-theorize the firm for responsible governance. Although the quest to rethink the purpose of the firm and capitalism is not new (see O’Toole and Vogel 2011), this paper attempts to provide some plausible arguments from an interdisciplinary approach to rethink the purpose of the firm and the implications of re-theorizing the firm.

This chapter is an edited version of the paper titled ‘Re-theorizing the firm: In pursuit of well-being and social justice,’ presented at the ISBEE Annual Conference in Warsaw, Poland, July, 2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly, D., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). The organizational implementation of corporate citizenship: An assessment tool and its application at UN global compact participants. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. (1995). Ownership and control. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A critical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2007). Positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on corporate social responsibility. EJBO Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies., 12(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R. A. (2004). The natural environment: Does it count? Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 130–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1998). The four faces of corporate citizenship. Business and Society Review, 100, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty, G. (2000). Citizenship in a global age. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1988). Introduction to the human sciences. Translated with an Introduction Essay by Betanzos, R. J. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1989). Introduction to human sciences. (Edited, with an introduction, by R. A. Makkreel & F. Rodi). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Paperback edition (2002). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermarth, M. (1978). Wilhelm Dilthey: The critique of historical reason. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2014). Corporate governance, responsible managerial behaviour, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy? The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Buisness Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1998). Stakeholder theory. In P. Werhane & R. E. Freeman (Eds.), The Blackwell encyclopedic dictionary of business ethics. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education., 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1998). Three normative models of democracy. In J. Habermas (Ed.), The inclusion of the other (pp. 239–252). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation: Political essays. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, I. (2002). Civic republicanism. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1997). The environment as stakeholder. Business Strategy Review, 6(2), 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). The theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., & Felps, W. (2013). Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(2), 207–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, I., Sachs, S., & Rühli, E. (2007). Corporate responsibility from an industry structure perspective – Stakeholder relations and maintaining the license to operate: a comparative case study of the Swiss telecommunications industry. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 446–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A. (2002). Addressing the crisis in confidence in corporations: Root causes, victims and strategies for reform. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1989). Liberalism, community and culture. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership: A relational approach. In T. Maak & N. Pless (Eds.), Responsible leadership (pp. 33–53). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2007). National responsibility and global justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, G. (2010). Social freedom in a multicultural state: Towards a theory of intercultural justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, G. (2014). Multi-stakeholder deliberation for (global) justice: An approach from modern civic republicanism. In S. Schepers & A. Kakabadse (Eds.), Rethinking the future of Europe: A challenge of governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, P., & E. Gaffney. (2009). Globalising corporate citizenship: Political and theoretical considerations (Working paper CSGP 09/04). Ontario: Centre for the Critical Study of Global Power and Politics, Trent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., & Vogel, D. (2011). Two and a half cheers for conscious capitalism. California Management Review, 53(3), 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhout, J. V. (2005). Dialogue. Corporate citizenship: An idea whose time has not yet come. Academy of Management Review, 30, 677–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frey B. S. (2003, July). Corporate governance for crooks? The case for corporate virtue (Working Paper Series, no. 164). Institute for Empirical Research in Economics/University of Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). “Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework”. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2008). The future of global corporate citizenship: Towards a new theory of the firm as a political actor. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 577–590). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (1984/1987). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R. A., & Reichart, J. (2000). The environment as a stakeholder? A fairness-based approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(2), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971/1999). Theory of justice. Revised edition (1999). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, S., Rühli, E., & Kern, I. (2009). Sustainable success with stakeholders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the limits of justice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (2000). What we owe to each other. Cambridge: First Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Towards a political conception of corporate responsibility – Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWillams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook on corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Smid, M. (2000). The downward spiral and the U.S. model business principles: Why MNEs should take responsibility for the improvement if world-wide social and environmental conditions. Management International Review, 40, 351–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G. (2008). Corporate governance and ethics: An Aristotelian perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (2005). Corporate responsibility, accountability and stakeholder relationships: Will voluntary action suffice? In J. P. Doh & S. A. Stumpf (Eds.), Handbook on responsible leadership and governance in global business. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30, 426–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A., Rands, G., & Godfrey, P. O. (2002). What are the responsibilities of business to society. In A. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 372–408). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. D. (2005). Private actors and legitimacy of governance beyond the state. Conceptional outlines and empirical explorations. In A. Benz & I. Papadopoulous (Eds.), Governance and democratic legitimacy (pp. 200–227). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Logsdon, J. M. (2001). Theorising business citizenship. In J. Andriof & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Perspectives on corporate citizenship (pp. 83–103). Greenleaf: Sheffield.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Logsdon, J. M., Lewellyn, P. G., & Davenport, K. (2006). Global business citizenship. A transformative framework for ethics and sustainable capitalism. Armonk/London: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2007). The civil corporation, Rev. edn. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganesh Nathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nathan, G. (2016). Towards Re-theorizing the Firm in Pursuit of Well-Being and Social Justice. In: Coutinho de Arruda, M., Rok, B. (eds) Understanding Ethics and Responsibilities in a Globalizing World. The International Society of Business, Economics, and Ethics Book Series, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23081-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics