Skip to main content

A Structural Model Comparison for Finding the Best Performing Models in a Collection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9253))

Abstract

An improvement or redesign of a process often starts by modifying the model supporting the process. Analysis techniques, like simulation, can be used to evaluate alternatives. However, even a small number of design choices may lead to an explosion of models that need to be explored to find the optimal models for said process. If the exploration depends on simulation, it often becomes infeasible to simulate every model. Therefore, for throughput time, we define a notion of monotonicity to reduce the number of models required to be simulated whilst the optimal models are still found.

D.M.M. Schunselaar, H.M.W. Verbeek, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der Aalst—This research has been carried out as part of the Configurable Services for Local Governments (CoSeLoG) project (http://www.win.tue.nl/coselog/).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Desel, J.: Validation of process models by construction of process nets. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 110–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Schunselaar, D.M.M., Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A.: A Structural Model Comparison for finding the Best Performing Models in a Collection. Technical Report BPM Center Report BPM-15-05, BPMcenter.org (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dijkman, R.M., La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A.: Managing Large Collections of Business Process Models - Current techniques and challenges. Computers in Industry 63(2), 91–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Ouyang, C., La Rosa, M., Song, L., Wang, J., Polyvyanyy, A.: APQL: a process-model query language. In: Song, M., Wynn, M.T., Liu, J. (eds.) AP-BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 159, pp. 23–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Suri, R.: A Concept of Monotonicity and Its Characterization for Closed Queueing Networks. Operations Research 33(3), 606–624 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahulea, C., Recalde, L., Silva, M.: Basic Server Semantics and Performance Monotonicity of Continuous Petri Nets. Discrete Event Dynamic Systems 19(2), 189–212 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Buzacott, J.A.: Commonalities in Reengineered Business Processes: Models and Issues. Manage. Sci. 42(5), 768–782 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Re-engineering Knock-out Processes. Decision Support Systems 30(4), 451–468 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nissen, M.E.: Redesigning Reengineering Through Measurement-Driven Inference. MIS Quarterly 22(4), 509–534 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Netjes, M.: Process Improvement: The Creation and Evaluation of Process. Ph.D thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schunselaar, D.M.M., Verbeek, H.M.W., Aalst, W.M.P. van der, Reijers, H.A.: Petra: a tool for analysing a process family. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings of the PNSE 2014, vol. 1160, pp. 269–288 (2014). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1160/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. M. Schunselaar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schunselaar, D.M.M., Verbeek, H.M.W., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2015). A Structural Model Comparison for Finding the Best Performing Models in a Collection. In: Motahari-Nezhad, H., Recker, J., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23063-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23062-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23063-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics