Skip to main content

Terra Preta de Índio and Amazonian History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Brazilian Amazon

Part of the book series: World Forests ((WFSE,volume 21))

  • 1108 Accesses

Abstract

Despite being the subject of exploitation and theories since the discovery of Brazil, the Amazon still holds secrets. Anthrosols are spread all over the world, but there is something singular about the one found in the dense vegetation of the South American rainforest. It is precisely the unique features of this soil horizon that have triggered stimulating debates and revisions on the history of the Amazon. In this chapter a study of the terra preta de índio is conducted with the aim to explore the special quality of this anthropic soil horizon, and the changes that it triggers in the history of the continent and for Brazilian agriculture. This chapter raises the questions addressed in the subsequent chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The nutrients are washed away.

  2. 2.

    Terra preta de índio is a soil horizon; it is the superficial horizon on top of various soils. A soil horizon is the vertical section that, cutting from the surface, goes down until weathering, showing in most cases several horizontal layers parallel to the surface. Each horizon has different characteristics.

  3. 3.

    TPI sites along rivers are normally larger and more linear than interfluve areas (Smith 1980).

  4. 4.

    Terra mulata is a term coined by Sombroek in 1966.

  5. 5.

    High cation exchange capacity is good because when chemical elements, such as calcium for example, goes into the soil solution, it is held by the soil and it does not go away. It works as a changeable storage place.

  6. 6.

    Biochar can affect the soil biological community. In the case of terra preta de índio, it has been demonstrated that it increases soil microbial biomass (Lehmann et al. 2011; Tsai et al. 2008).

  7. 7.

    Higher than adjacent soils which are acidic. In the example given, the control soil (non-TPI) had a pH of 4.4 where the TPI had 5.4.

  8. 8.

    Colour, pH, carbon, nitrogen, calcium (which can come from human and animal faeces, bones and other organic and inorganic residues), potassium, magnesium (the last two indicate vegetal ash), copper and zinc (mainly in urine and faeces, respectively, which indicate intense occupation or occupation for a long period).

  9. 9.

    It is important to stress the research of Balée and Clement in the topic of cultural history and knowledge on anthropic soils. They have been conducting research on these issues for decades and have made sound contributions to the study of not only TPI, but also of the Amazon.

  10. 10.

    The geographer Morse, for example, said that the soils were “extremely fertile” in 1809 (Kern et al. 2009).

  11. 11.

    Ortom, J. The Andes and the Amazon 1875.

  12. 12.

    Smith, Herbert. The Amazons and the Coast 1879.

  13. 13.

    It is important to stress that the dark horizons were only recently considered anthropic artefacts.

  14. 14.

    Faria (1946) is a defender of the natural genesis.

  15. 15.

    The Açutuba site, for example, is by the river Negro.

  16. 16.

    It is important to notice, however, that there is little information on how the charcoal is preserved in an agricultural field with frequent tillage.

  17. 17.

    The Pronapaba was created by Clifford Evans, Betty Megers and Mario Simões in cooperation with many Brazilian archaeologists.

  18. 18.

    For a list of the Museum group that researches terra preta de índio, go to http://www.museu-goeldi.br/pesquisa/ecologia/tpa/paginas_imagens/publi.htm and click on publication list.

  19. 19.

    Zech, W. et al. Analytische Kennzeichnung vom Terra Preta do Índio. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Bodenkundlichen Gesellschaft [S.I.], v. 29, p. 709, 1979.

  20. 20.

    Pabst, E. Terra Preta do Índio: Chemische Kennzeichnung und ökologische Bedeutung einer brasilianischen Indianerschwarzerde. (1985). 362 f. Dissertação de mestrado - Fakultät fur Geowissenschaften, Ludwig-Maximilian Universität, München, 1985.

    Pabst, E.E. Terra Preta—Ein Beitrag zur Genese-Diskussion auf der Basis von Geländearbeiten bei Tupi-Völkern Amazoniens. 1993. 143 PhD. Gesamthochschule Universität Kassel, Kassel.

  21. 21.

    Bates arrived in the Amazon in 1848 with Alfred Wallace and stayed in the forest for 11 years collecting data of more than 8000 species that was sent to the British Museum.

  22. 22.

    Buffon wrote that the American Indian “was in himself no more than a first-class animal and, for nature, merely an inconsequential being, a sort of impotent automaton incapable of bringing her reform or succor.” (Euvres completes, VX: 443 in Descola).

  23. 23.

    Falesi states that latosols, which covered 70 % of the Brazilian Amazon, have low chemical fertility (Falesi 1974: 203). He goes on to say that the soils of the terra firme have, in general, low or average fertility (Falesi 1974: 227).

  24. 24.

    In this text, Sombroek suggests that new information on soils of the region had become available and earlier statements were being refuted (Sombroek 1984: 521).

  25. 25.

    Richter and Babbar (1991: 325).

  26. 26.

    Needless to say, this is no longer the case. It is also important to highlight that Brazil is seen as an “agricultural superpower” and that in three decades the Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research became one of the leading institutions in the world on tropical agriculture (Rother 2007).

  27. 27.

    “The population density per unit area is a rough measure of the success of subsistence activities in the area, and it is correlated to some degree with cultural development.” Vol. 5 p. 655.

    “From a technological and ecological point of view, the basic tropical forest culture is strikingly uniform so far as present data reveal.” Vol. 3 p. 885.

  28. 28.

    In 1954, Meggers wrote, “The evidence suggests that the environment exerts an insurmountable limiting effect on the cultures it supports as long as it permits only a hunting and gathering subsistence pattern, and that this limitation extends to all areas of the culture, even those that seem remotely or not at all related to the subsistence requirements.” (1954: 807).

  29. 29.

    Before Present (1950).

  30. 30.

    David Maybury-Lewis wrote about his experience in the Amazon with the Sherente and the Krahó (1955–56 and a short visit in 1963) and with the Shavante (1958, summer of 1962 and a short visit in 1964).

  31. 31.

    Marriage among the trio: a principal of social organization. 1969.

  32. 32.

    The perspective of environmental limitation in the Amazon rainforest focused firstly on the infertility of Amazonian soils and then shifted its focus to lacking protein resources in the soils (Beckerman 1994: 178).

  33. 33.

    To view critiques to Roosevelt’s work, see Viveiros De Castro (1996).

  34. 34.

    In this article, Carneiro presents a critique of one of Roosevelt’s articles and he goes over the main thesis of his work.

  35. 35.

    Meggers wrote, “Man is an animal and like all other animals must maintain an adaptive relationship with his surroundings in order to survive and although he achieves this adaptation principally through the medium of culture, the process is guided by the same rules of natural selection that govern biological adaptation.” Meggers (1971: 4).

  36. 36.

    Although by Law these lands are for indigenous use, there is a history in Brazil of indigenous land being invaded, which creates conflict. One example is Raposa/Serra do Sol, an indigenous land for the Macixu in Roraima, Brazil. The land was demarcated and it was approved by President Lula in 2005. However, this demarcation has been contested by non-indigenous people and by the state of Roraima. The non-indigenous people, rice producers and cattle ranchers, disputed the demarcation and refused to leave their land. As with the demarcation of the indigenous land, all those non-indigenous people have to be re-settled. One of the problems was that most of the producers did not have land titles and therefore were not entitled to compensation. The situation reached a level of such tension that the federal government had to send in soldiers from the National Security Force. Another key case was the invasion of the Yanomami land by miners in the 1980s. There were reports of 40 thousand people invading the reserve, which had great impact on the indigenous population. In 2011, with the high price of gold in the international market, people feared that same situation would happen because invasions were already being reported. Source: http://www.ipam.org.br/mais/noticiasitem?id=1389.

  37. 37.

    This is not to say that I am defending the view of the indigenous population as natural conservationists, a very romantic view. The argument is that indigenous people do have knowledge regarding the forest that can be less destructive than the ones pursued by those outside the forest.

  38. 38.

    It is important to stress that the first written records are from these dates, but some people believe it occurred before then.

  39. 39.

    Animals as well as humans carry disease. Besides all the diseases brought by the Europeans—smallpox, influenza, measles—there were also the diseases carried by animals. In Europe human beings were accustomed to be around animals such as horses and pigs, but that was not the case with the indigenous population. Mann (2005) discusses an episode in Southern United States in which it is argued that pigs were a source of contamination of zoonotic diseases, such as anthrax, brucellosis, leptospirosis, trichinosis and tuberculosis (Mann 2005: 109).

  40. 40.

    It is worth pointing out that this site was not in a good state of preservation, which means we must take this information with care. New excavations are needed to confirm it.

  41. 41.

    Meggers and Evans (1957) argue that the Marajoara culture is a mixture of more advance circum-Caribbean and sub-andean cultures (1957: 418).

  42. 42.

    Roosevelt is an important actor in Brazilian archaeology as she certified that ceramic production in the lower Amazon in the 8th millennium bp (Neves 1998: 2). She was not the first to suggest that date, but she received wide recognition for her work, which was published in detail. The evidence acquired by her work pushed the chronology of the Amazon rainforest to the 11th millennium bp.

  43. 43.

    “The policroma ceramics are marked by the decoration in red, burgundy, orange and black over a white base. Similar to the ceramic from the Marajoara phase, the policroma ceramic are decorated with modelated, incision, excision, etc.” (Neves 2006: 61).

  44. 44.

    Regarding this argument, one interesting question is why people do not apply this argument to civilisations from other rivers, such as the Nile River or the Yellow River, or the Euphrates River. Why is this only used in the context of the Amazon?

  45. 45.

    One would have to include clear water rivers in this division, making that a threefold division of rivers.

  46. 46.

    The vision of the Amazon with poor soils that cannot hold cultivation for more than one or two years resembles more the reality in back water rivers (Moran 1993: 36).

  47. 47.

    Diegues makes a bridge between the vision of the Amazon as untouched and the establishment of parks with no human habitants in them (Diegues 1997: 316).

  48. 48.

    That is not to say that agriculture became more productive. Denevan (2009) argues that there was an involution after the introduction of metal axes, and that agriculture before the Europeans was more intensive and more productive.

  49. 49.

    Redford goes on to say that by seeing the indigenous population as noble savages, living in harmony with nature and with the knowledge that we need to survive in a world with an environmental crisis puts a lot of pressure on these communities. “The future”, he goes on, “is on a mosaic of different information from different places. One of them is traditional knowledge.”

  50. 50.

    Cronon said that the wilderness was linked to romanticism and to the idea of a frontier.

  51. 51.

    In this case the West includes Europe and the United States and not the countries that are geographically in the west of planet Earth.

  52. 52.

    See, for example, Shetler, 1991. Three Faces of Eden. In Seeds of Change: A Quincentennial Commemoration, ed. H.J. Viola and C. Margolis. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.

  53. 53.

    By positive I mean increasing the richness and equitability of nature through enhancing biodiversity (Balée and Erickson 2006: 4).

  54. 54.

    Balée presents four postulates for historical landscape: human activity has affected a great part of the globe; there is no predetermination to either conservation or destruction; the pathway of landscape is historically contingent; humans and the landscape that was created by their activities cannot be seen as separate from one another.

  55. 55.

    Research on pollen and phytoliths, for example, are carried out to help reconstruct plant use in the past.

  56. 56.

    It is important to stress that biochar is a soil amendment, not a soil fertiliser.

  57. 57.

    This data refers to the vegetation in 1990.

  58. 58.

    Sustainable is very tricky word, and it must be used carefully. In this sense, sustainable refers to the ability of a soil to produce harvest. That does not mean that the farmer will profit from what he/she has produced, the point here is that there will be a production and it will be sustained through time.

References

  • Andrade A (1986) Investigación Arqueologica de los Antrosoles de Araracuara. Fundación de Investigaciones Arqueologicas Nacionales, Bogotá, V. 31, pp 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée W (2010) Contingent diversity on anthropic landscapes. Diversity 2:163–181 (Basel)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balée W (2006) The research programme of historical ecology. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:75–98 (California)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balée W (2000) Qui a planté les décors de L’Amazonie? La Recherche, Ilê-de-France, No. 333, pp. 18–23. http://www.larecherche.fr/content/recherche/article?id=14066. Accessed on 10 Apr 2014

  • Balée W (1995) Historical ecology of Amazonia. In: Sponsel L (ed) Indigenous peoples and the future of Amazonia: an ecological anthropology of an endangered world. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson & London, pp 97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Balée W, Erickson C (eds) (2006) Time and complexity in historical ecology: studies in the neotropical lowlands. Columbia University Press, New York, 432p

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto C (1998) Brazilian archaeology from a Brazilian perspective. Antiquity 72(277):573–581 (York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreto C, Machado J (2001) Exploring the Amazon, explaining the unknown: views from the past. In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves E (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. The British Museum Press, London, pp 232–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow CJ (1985) The development of the varézas (floodlands) of Brazilian Amazonia. In: Hemming J (ed) Change in the Amazon. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 108–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman S (1994) Hunting and fishing in Amazonia: hold the answers, what are the questions? In: Roosevelt AC (ed) Amazonian Indians: from prehistory to the present. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 177–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro R (1970) A theory of the origin of the state. American Association for the Advancement of Science 169(3947):733–738 (Washington, DC)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro R (1995) The history of ecological interpretations of Amazonia: does Roosevelt have it right? In: Sponsel L (ed) Indigenous peoples and the future of Amazonia: an ecological anthropology of an endangered world. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson & London, pp 46–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvajal G de (1934) The discovery of the Amazon. Complied by Medina JT. Heaton H (ed), Special Publications no. 17. American Geographical Society, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary D (2001) Towards an environmental history of the Amazon: from prehistory to the nineteenth century. Lat Am Res Rev 36(2):64–96 (Baltimore)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement CR (1999) 1492 and the loss of Amazonian crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. Econ Bot 53(2):188–202 (New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa J, Kern D, Costa M, Rodrigues T, Kampf N, Lehmann J, Frazão J (2009) Geoquímica das Terras Pretas Amazônicas. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Madari BE, Lima HN, Woods W (Orgs) As Terras Pretas de Índios da Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Manaus, Editora da Universidade de Manaus – EDUA, pp 162–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronon W (1995) The trouble with wilderness; or getting back to the wrong nature. In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: rethinking the human place in nature. W.W. Norton & Co., New York, pp 69–90. http://www.williamcronon.net/writing/Cronon_Trouble_with_Wilderness_1995.pdf. Accessed on 10 Oct 2014

  • Crumley C (1994) Historical ecology: a multidimensional ecological orientation. In: Crumley C (ed) Historical ecology: cultural knowledge and changing landscapes. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan W (1992) The pristine myth: the landscape of the Americas in the 1492. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82(3) (Lawrence, The Americas before and after 1992: current geographical research, pp 369–385)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denevan W (1996) A bluff model of riverine settlement in prehistoric Amazonia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 86(4):654–681 (Lawrence)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denevan W (2009) As Origens Agrícolas da Terra Mulata na Amazônia. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Madari BE, Lima HN, Woods W (Orgs) As Terras Pretas de Índios da Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Manaus, Editora da Universidade de Manaus – EDUA, pp 82–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola P (1996a) In the society of nature: a native ecology in Amazonia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 372

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Descola P (1996b) Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice. In: Descola P, Pálsson G (eds) Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, New York, pp 82–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Diegues A (1997) O Mito do Paraíso Desabitado nas Florestas Tropicais Brasileiras. In: Castro E. Pinton F (Orgs) Faces do Trópico Úmido: conceitos e questões sobre o Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente. Pará, São Paulo: Editora Cejup, pp 315–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer P (1996) The invention of nature. In: Ellen R, Fukui K (eds) Redefining nature: ecology, culture and domestication. TJ Press Ltd, Oxford, Washington, DC, pp 157–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden M, Bray W, Herrera L, McEwan C (1984) terra preta and their archaeological context in the caqueta basin of Southeast Colombia. Am Antiq 49(1):125–140 (Washington)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EMBRAPA (1981) Serviço Nacional de Levantamento e Conservação de Solos (Rio de Janeiro, RJ). Mapa de solos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro. Mapa colorido, escala 1:5.000.000. Acompanha texto: CAMARGO, M.N. Comunicado expositivo do mapa de solos do Brasil

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, Kimble J, Cook T, Beinroth FH (1992) Soil diversity in the tropics: implications for agricultural development. In: Lal R, Sanchez PA (eds) Myths and science of soils of the tropics. SSSA (Soil Science Society of America) Special Publication Number 29, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson CL (2003) Agricultural landscapes as world heritage: raised field agriculture in Bolivia and Peru. In: Teutonico JM, Matero F (eds) Managing change: sustainable approaches to the conservation of the built environment. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles, pp 181–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Falesi IC (1974) Soils of the Brazilian Amazon. In: Wagley W (ed) Man in the Amazon. Center for Latin American Studies, The University Presses of Florida, Gainsville, pp 201–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria JB (1946) A Cerâmica da Tribo Uaboí dos rios Trombetas e Jamundá. Conselho Nacional de Proteção ao Índio p, Rio de Janeiro, pp 5–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside P (2009) Estoque e Estabilidade do Carbono nos Solos da Amazônia Brasileira. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Madari BE, Lima HN, Woods W (Orgs) As Terras Pretas de Índios da Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Manaus, Editora da Universidade de Manaus – EDUA, pp 258–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53(1):77–88 (Arlington)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J (2010) Caboclo horticulture and Amazonian dark earths along the middle Madeira river, Brazil. Hum Ecol 38:651–662 (Amsterdam)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser J, Clement C (2008) Dark earths and manioc cultivation in central Amazônia: a window on pré-columbian agricultural systems? Ciências Humanas 3(2):175–194 (Santa Catarina)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman I (1977) The Amazon basin, another Sahel? Science (R.J.A., and H.S)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadelha RM (2002) Conquista e Ocupação da Amazônia: a fronteira norte do brasil. Estudos Avançados 16(45):63–78 (São Paulo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Garda A, Da Silva JM, Baiao P (2010) Biodiversity conservation and sustainable development in the Amazon. Syst Biodivers 8(2):169–175 (London)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • German L (2003) Historical contingencies in the coevolution of environment and livelihood: contributions to the debate on Amazonian black earth. Geoderma 111:307–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B (2007) prehistorically modified soils of central Amazonia: a model for sustainable agriculture in the twenty-first century. Philos Trans Roy Soc 362:187–196 (London)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Haumaier L (2001) The ‘terra preta’ phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics. Naturwissenschaften 88:37–41 (Berlin)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes D (2008) Cotidiano e Poder na Amazonia Pre-colonial. Editora Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, p 237p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondim N (1994) A Invenção da Amazônia. Marco Zero, São Paulo, p 277p

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland R, Irwin H (1975) A Selva Amazônica: do inferno verde ao deserto vermelho? São Paulo: Editora Itatiaia, Editora da Universidade de São Paulo. Reconquista do Brasil 30:156p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourou P (1950) Observações Geográficas na Amazónia. Revista Brasileira Geográfica 3:49–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourou P (1966) The tropical world: its social and economic conditions and its future status, 4th edn. Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham E (1998) Metaphor and metamorphism: some thoughts on environmental metahistory. In: Balée W (ed) Advances in historical ecology. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 119–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenland DJ, Wild D, Adams D (1992) Organic matter dynamics in soils of the tropics—from myth to complex reality. In SSSA special publication, vol. 29 Lal R, Sanchez PA (eds) WI: Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison pp 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger M (2005) The ecology of power: culture, place and personhood in the Southern amazon, A.D. 1000-2000. Routledge, New York, 404p

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger M, Russel J, Toney J, Schmidt M (2007) The legacy of cultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon: implications for biodiversity. Philantrop Trans Roy Soc Biol Sci 362:197–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckenberger M, Russel C, Fausto C, Toney J, Schmidt M, Pereira E, Franchetto B, Kuikuro A (2008) Pre-Columbian urbanism, Anthropogenic landscapes and the future of the Amazon. Science 321(1214):214–217 (Washington)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert PP (1955) A Cerâmica Arqueológica da Região de Oriximiná. Instituto de Antropologia e Etnologia do Pará, Belém, p 76

    Google Scholar 

  • Homma A (2005) Amazônia: como aprovietar os benefícios da destruição? Estudos Avançados 19(54):115–135 (São Paulo)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg A (2005) Ethnogenesis, regional integration, and ecology in prehistoric Amazonia. Curr Anthropol 46(4) (Chicago)

    Google Scholar 

  • Irion G (1978) Soil infertility in the Amazonian rain forest. Naturwissenschaften 65:515–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H (1994) Factors of soil formation: a system of quantitative pedology. Dover Publications Inc, New York, p 191p

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan CF (1985) Nutrient cycling in tropical forest ecosystems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Junquera AB, Shepard JRGH, Clement C (2010) Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils in Brazilian Amazonia conserve agrobiodiversity. Biodiversity Conservation 19:1933–1961 (London)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junqueira AB, Shepard JR GH, Clement CR (2011) Secondary forests on anthropogenic soils of the middle Madeira River: valuation, local knowledge, and landscape domestication in brazilian amazonia. Econ Bot 65(1):85–99 (New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kämpf N, Kern DC (2005) O solo como registro da ocupação humana pré-histórica na Amazônia. In: Vidal-Torrado P, Alleoni LRF, Cooper M, Silva AP, Cardoso EJ (Org.). Tópicos em Ciência do solo. Viçosa, v. VI, pp 277–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern D, Kampf N, Woods W, Denevan W, Costa M, Frazão F, Sombroek W (2009) As Terras Pretas de Índio na Amazônia: ecolução do conhecimento em terra preta de índio. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Madari BE, Lima HN, Woods W (Orgs). As Terras Pretas de Índios da Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Manaus, Editora da Universidade de Manaus – EDUA, pp 72–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern D, Kampf N (1989) Comissão V – Gênese, Morfologia e Classificação do Solo. Antigos Assentamento Indígenas na Formulação de Solos com Terra Preta Arqueológica na Região de Oriximiná, Pará. Revisa Brasileira de Ciência de Solo 13:219–225 (Campinas)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap D (1975) O alto Amazonas. Editorial Verbo, Lisboa, p 271p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Rillig M, Thies J, Masiello C, Hockaday W, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1986. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, da Silva Jr. JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W and Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant and Soil 249:343–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell WG (1992) “Heavy shadows and black night”: disease and depopulation in colonial Spanish America. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 82(3) (Lawrence, The Americas Before and After 1492: Current Geographical Research, pp 426–443)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo RS (2009) Atributos Físicos, Químicos e Mineralógicos de Solos com Horizonte Anrópico (terra Preta de Índio) em Áreas de Várzea do Rio Solimões, AM. Masters dissertation. The Federal University of Amazonas. Gruaduate Programme in Tropical Agronomy. Manaus, 74p

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangrich A, Maia C, Novotny E (2011) Biocarvão: as terras pretas de índios e o sequestro de carbono. Ciência Hoje 47/281:49–52 (São Paulo)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann C (2002) The real dirt on rainforest fertility. Science 297(5583):920–923 (Washington)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mann C (2005) 1491: new revelations of the Americas before Columbus. Vintage Books, New York, 541p

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris E (2006) Putting the carbon back: black is the new green. Nature 442:624–626 (London)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattos L, Brondizio E, Romeiro A, Orair R (2010) Agricultura de Pequena Escala e Suas Implicações na Transição Agroecologica na Amazônia Brasileira. Amazônica 2(2):264–292 (Manaus)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybury-Lewis D (1965) The savage and the innocent. Beacon Press, Boston, 270p

    Google Scholar 

  • McKey D, Rostain S, Iriarte J, Glaser B, Birk J, Holst I, Renard D (2010) Pre-Columbian agricultural landscapes, ecosystem engineers, and self-organised patchiness in Amazonia. PNAS 107(17):7823–7828 (Washington)

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil M (1964) Laterite soils. Sci Am 211:68–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (1954) Environmental limitation on the development of culture. In: American anthropologist. New series, Washington, DC, vol 56(5) Part 1, pp 801–824

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (1971) Amazônia: man and culture in a counterfeit paradise. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, p 207p

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (1974) Environment and culture in Amazonia. In: Wagley W (ed) Man in the Amazon. Centre for Latin American Studies, The University Presses of Florida, Gainsville, pp 91–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (1984) The Indigenous peoples of Amazonia, their cultures, land use patterns and effects on the landscape and biota. In: Sioli H (ed) The Amazon: liminology and landscape ecology of a mighty tropical region and its basin. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, cap. 25, pp 627–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (1995) Judging the future by the past: the impact of environmental instability on prehistoric Amazonian populations. In: Sponsel L (ed) Indigenous Peoples and the Future of Amazonia: an ecological anthropology of an endangered world. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson and London, pp 15–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (2001) The continuing quest for El Dorado: round two. Lat Am Antiq 12(3):304–325 (Washington)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B (2003) Natural versus anthropogenic sources of Amazonian biodiversity: the continuing quest for el Dorado. In: Bradshaw GA, Marquet PA, Ronnenberg KL (eds) How landscapes change: human disturbance and ecosystem fragmentation in the Americas. Springer, Berlin, pp 89–107

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B, Evans C (1957) Archaeological investigations at the mouth of the Amazon. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Etnology. Bulletin 167. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 817p

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers B, Evans C (1973) An Interpretation of the Cultures of the Marajó Island. In: Gross D (ed) Peoples and Cultures of Native South America. The Natural History Press, New York, pp 39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E (1985) An assessment of a decade of colonisation in the Amazon Basin. In: Hemming J (ed) Changing in the Amazon basin volume II: the Frontier after a decade of Colonisation. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E (1991) Human adaptive strategies in Amazonian blackwater ecosystems. In: American anthropologist. New series, Washington, DC, vol 93(2), pp 361–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E (1993) Through Amazonian eyes: the human ecology of Amazonian populations. University of Iowa Press, Iowa city, p 230p

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E (1995) Disaggregating Amazonia: a strategy for understanding biological and cultural diversity. In: Sponsel L (ed) Indigenous peoples and the future of Amazonia: an ecological anthropology of an endangered world. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson & London, pp 71–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran E (1996) Nurturing the forest: strategies of native Amazonians. In: Ellen R and Fukui K. Redefining Nature: ecology, culture and domestification. TJ Press Ltd, Oxford, Washington, DC, pp 531–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves EG (1998) Twenty years of Amazonian archaeology in Brazil. Antiquity 72:625–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves EG (2006) Arqueologia da Amazônia. Jorge Zahar, Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves EG (2009) Arqueologia. In: Maurício de Paiva; Mônica Trindade Canejo. (Org.). Amazônia: Arqueologia no Entorno. Dorea Books and Arts, São Paulo, v., pp 15–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves EG, Petersen JB, Bartone RN (2003) Da Silva CA historical and socio-cultural origins of Amazonian dark earths. In: Lehmann J, Kern D, Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths—origin, properties and management. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, pp 29–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny EH, Hayes MHB, Madari BE, Bonagamba TJ, De Azevedo ER, De Souza AA, Song G, Nogueira CM, Mangrich AS (2009) Lessons from terra preta de índios of the Amazon region for utilisation of charcoal for soil amendment. J Braz Chem Soc 20(6):1003–1010 (São Paulo)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent S (1981) Amazonia: ecosystem and social system. In: Royal anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. Man. New series, London, vol 16(1), pp 62–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent S (1993) Amazonian Caboclo society: an essay on invisibility ad peasant economy. Oxford: Berg, 277p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa M, Okimori Y (2010) Pioneering works in Biochar Research, Japan. Aust J Soil Res 48:489–500 (Melbourne)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver J (2001) The archaeology of forest foraging and agricultural production in Amazonia. In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves E (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. The British Museum Press, London, pp 50–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Parssinen M, Schaan D, Ranzi A (2009) Pre-Columbian geometric earthworks in the upper Purus: a complex society in western Amazonia. Antiquity 83:1084–1095 (Washington)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen J, Neves E, Heckenbeger M (2001) Gift from the past: terra preta and prehistoric Ameridian occupation in Amazonia. In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves E (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. The British Museum Press, Londres, pp 86–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick C (1978) The complementary function of floodplains for agricultural utilization. Appl Sci Dev 12:26–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno D, Pearsall D (1998) The origins of Agriculture in the lowland neotropics. Academic Press, São Diego, 400p. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780125571807. Accessed on Oct 7, 2014

  • Politis G (2001) Foragers of the Amazon: the last survivors or the first to succeed? In: McEwan C, Barreto C, Neves E (eds) Unknown Amazon: culture in nature in ancient Brazil. The British Museum Press, London, pp 26–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Porras P (1987) Investigaciones arqueologicas a las faldas del Sangay: Tradición Upano. Universidad Católica, Centro de Investigaciones Arqueológicas, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Porro A (1995) O Povo das Águas: ensaios de etno-história amazônica. Rio de Janeiro, Vozes, 204p

    Google Scholar 

  • Posey D (1998) The “balance sheet” and the “sacred Balance”: valuing the knowledge of indigenous and traditional peoples. Worldviews: Glob Relig Cult Ecol 2(2):91–106 (Austin)

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffles H, WinklerPrinks A (2003) Further reflections on Amazonian environmental history: transformations of rivers and streams. Lat Am Res Rev 38(3):165–187 (New York)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffles H (2002) In Amazonia: a natural history. Princeton University Press, Princeton and London, p 302p

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford K (1991) The ecologically noble savage. Cult Survival 15(1) (Cambridge, MA)

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss S, Rother L, Jensen H, Came B, Taylor J, Lord M (1980) Vanishing forest. Newsweek 24:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro BC (1995) Os Índios das Águas Pretas: moso de produção e equipamento produtivo. Companhia das Letras: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 270p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritcher DD, Babbar LI (1991) Soil diversity in the tropics. Adv Ecol Res 21:315–389 (London)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rival L (2006) Amazonian historical ecologies. J Roy Anthopol Inst S79–S94 (London)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt AC (1980) Parmana: prehistoric maize and manioc subsistence along the amazon and orinoco. Academic Press, New York, p 320p

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt AC (1994) Amazonian anthropology: strategy for a new synthesis. In: Roosevelt AC (ed) Amazonian Indians: from prehistory to the present. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt AC, Lima da Costa M, Lopes Machado C (1996) Paleoindian cave dwellers in the Amazon: the peopling of the Americas. Science 272(5260):373–384 (Washington)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother L (2007) Scientists are making Brazil’s savannah bloom. The New York Times. 2 October 2007.   http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/science/02tropic.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed on October 27, 2014

  • Salazar E (1998) De Vuleta al Sangay Investigaciones Arqueologicas en el Alto Upano, Amazonia Ecuatoriana. Bull Inst Etudes Andines 27(2):213–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA, Brandy DE, Villachica JH, Nicholaides JJ (1982) Amazon basins soils: management for continuous crop production. Science 216(4548):821–827 (Washington)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez P, Logan T (1992) Myths and science about the chemistry and fertility of soils in the tropics. In: Lal R, Sanchez PA (eds) Myths and science of soils of the tropics. SSSA (Soil Science Society of America) Special Publication Number 29, pp 35–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater C (1996) Amazonia as edenic narrative. In: Cronon W (ed) Uncommon ground: toward reinventing nature. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York, pp 114–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N (1980) Anthrosols and human carrying capacity in Amazonia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 70(4):553–566 (Lawrence)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombroek W (1984) Soils of the Amazon region. In. Sioli H (ed) The Amazon: liminology and landscape ecology of a mighty tropical region and its basin. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, cap. 20, vol 56, pp 521–535

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombroek W (1966) Amazon soil: a reconnaissance of the soils of the Brazilian amazon region. PhD thesis, Wageningen, Centre for Agricultural Publications and Documentation, 262p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sombroek WG, Kern D, Rodrigues T, Cravo M, Jarbas T, Woods W, Glaser B (2002) Terra preta and terra mulata: pre-Columbian Amazon kitchen middens and agricultural fields, their sustainability and their replication. Symposium 18. Oral presentation at the Soil Conference, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl PW (1996) Holocene biodiversity: an archeological perspective from the Americas. Ann Rev Anthropol 25:105–126 (Palo Alto)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl PW (2008) The contributions of zooarchaeology to historical ecology in the neotrpoics. Quat Int 180:5–16 (Amsterdam)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steward J (1946–1948) The handbook of South American Indians. Smithsonian Institute. Washington Government Print, vol 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner C, Teixeira W, Zech W (2004) Slash and Char: an alternative to slash and burn practiced in the amazon basin. In: Glaser B, Woods W (eds) Amazonian dark earths: explorations in space and time. Springer, Berlin, pp 183–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stokstad E (2003) ‘Pristine’ forest teemed with people. Science 301(5640):1645–1646 (Washington)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strathern M (1980) No nature, no culture: the Hagen case. In: MaCcormack C, Strathern M (eds) Nature, culture and gender. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira WG, Martins GS (2003) Estabilidade de Agregados Como Indicador de Qualidade Física do Solo em Terra Preta de Índio. XXIX Congresso Brasileiro de Ciência do Solo, Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Ribeirão Preto, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai SM, O’Neil B, Cannavan F, Campos D, Medau R, Fedrizzi S, Grossmann J, Thies J (2008) Biodiversity in Amazonian dark earth: a contribution for the sustainability of tropical soils from the microbial symbioses. Biological Nitrogen Fixation: towards poverty alleviation through sustainable agriculture. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture vol 2, Part 1, pp 35–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Butzer KW (1992) The Columbian encounter and land-use change. Environment 34(8):16–20 (Washington)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulhoa A (2005) The ecological native: indigenous people’s movements and eco-governmentality in Colombia. Routledge, New York and London, p 306

    Google Scholar 

  • Viveiros De Castro E (1996) Images of nature and society in Amazonian ethnology. Ann Rev Anthropol 25:179–200 (Palo Alto)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagley C (1953) Amazon town: a study of the man in tropics. The Macmillan Company, New York, p 315p

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1979) Uma Narrativa de Viagens pelos Rios Amazonas e Negro. Editora USP, São Paulo, p 318p

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (1980) Ideas of nature. In: Williams R (ed) Problems in materialism and culture: selected essays. Verso, London, pp 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis KJ, Gillson L, Brncic TM (2004) How “virgin” is the rainforest? Science 304(402):402–403 (Washington, DC, London)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WinklerPrinks AMGA (2002) A history of perceiving the soil in the Amazon Basin. Paper presented at the 17th world congress of soil science, held in Thailand, 14–21 August 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W (1995) Comments on the black earths of Amazonia. Pap Proc Appl Geogr Conf 18:159–165 (Cambridge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W (2009) Os Solos e as Ciênicas Humanas: interpretação do passado. In: Teixeira WG, Kern DC, Madari BE, Lima HN, Woods W (Orgs) As Terras Pretas de Índios da Amazônia: sua caracterização e uso deste conhecimento na criação de novas áreas. Manaus: Editora da Universidade de Manaus – EDUA, pp 62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W, Denevan WM (2009) Amazonian darth earths: the first century of reports. In: Woods W, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J, Steiner C, WinklerPrins AM, Rebellato L (eds) Amazonian dark earths: Wim Sombroek’s vision. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W, Falcão N, Teixeira W (2006) Biochar trials aim to enrich soil for smallholders. Nature 442 (Letter to the Editor in response to the article by Marris E. Black is the New Green, Washington, DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods W, MacCainn JM (1999) The anthropogenic origin and persistence of Amazonian dark earths. Conf Lat Am Geogr Yearb 7–14 (Austin, University of Texas)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Bezerra .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bezerra, J. (2015). Terra Preta de Índio and Amazonian History. In: The Brazilian Amazon. World Forests, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23030-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics