Abstract
I argue that there exist three different ways of analyzing the logistic equation and that these different kinds of analysis reveal very different properties. Furthermore, I claim that these different properties have been used to justify two different, coexisting definitions of chaos.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banks, J., Brooks, J., Cairns, G., Davis, G., & Stacey, P. (1992). On Devaney’s definition of chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 99, 332–334.
Berger, A. (2001). Chaos and chance: An introduction to stochastic aspects of dynamics. New York: Walter de Gruyer.
Devaney, R. L. (1989). An introduction to chaotic dynamical systems. Redwood City: Addison Wesley.
Guckenheimer, J., Oster, G., & Ipaktchi, A. (1977). The dynamics of density dependent population models. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 4, 101–147.
Hilborn, R. C. (2002). Chaos and nonlinear dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kellert, S. H. (1993). In the wake of chaos. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kellert, S. H. (2008). Borrowed knowledge: Chaos theory and the challenge of learning across disciplines. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Li, T.-Y., & Yorke, J. A. (1975). Period three implies chaos. The American Mathematical Monthly, 82, 985–992.
Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 20, 130–141.
Lorenz, E. (1993). The essence of chaos. London: UCL Press.
May, R. M. (1974). Biological populations with non-overlapping generations: Stable points, stable cycles, and chaos. Science, 15, 645–647.
May, R. M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261, 459–467.
May, R. M. (1986). The Croonian lecture, 1985: When two and two does not make four: Non-linear phenomena in ecologys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 228, 241–266.
May, R. M., & Osler, G. F. (1976). Bifurcations and dynamic complexity in simple ecological models. The American Naturalist, 110, 573–599.
Ruelle, D. (1991). Chance and chaos. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smale, S. (1967). Differentially dynamical systems. I. diffeomorphisms. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 73, 747–816.
Smale, S. (1998). Mathematical problems for the new century. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 20, 7–15.
Tucker, W. (2002). A rigorous ODE solver and Smale’s 14th problem. Foundations of Computational Mathematics, 2, 53–117.
Werndl, C. (2009). Justifying definitions in mathematics: Going beyond Lakatos. Philosophia Mathematica, 17, 313–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zuchowski, L.C. (2015). Revisiting Smale’s Fourteenth Problem to Discover Two Definitions of Chaos. In: Mäki, U., Votsis, I., Ruphy, S., Schurz, G. (eds) Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. European Studies in Philosophy of Science, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23014-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23015-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)