Damasio’s Somatic Marker for Social Robotics: Preliminary Implementation and Test

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9222)


How experienced emotional states, induced by the events that emerge in our context, influence our behaviour? Are they an obstacle or a helpful assistant for our reasoning process? Antonio Damasio gave exhaustive answers to these questions through his studies on patients with brain injuries. He demonstrated how the emotions guide decision-making and he has identified a region of the brain which has a fundamental role in this process. Antoine Bechara devised a test to validate the proper functioning of that cortical region of the brain. Inspired from Damasio’s theories we developed a mechanism in an artificial agent that enables it to represent emotional states and to exploit them for biasing its decisions. We also implement the card gambling task that Bechara used on his patients as a validating test. Finally we put our artificial agent through this test for 100 trials. The results of this experiment are analysed and discussed highlighting the demonstrated efficiency of the implemented somatic marker mechanism and the potential impact of this system in the field of social robotics.


Somatic marker hypothesis Human-inspired Cognitive systems Artificial intelligence Emotion Decision-making Reinforcement learning 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.: Deciding conservatively before knowing the conservative strategy. Science 275, 1293–1294 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., Anderson, S.W.: Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition 50(1), 7–15 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A.R., Lee, G.P.: Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. The Journal of Neuroscience 19(13), 5473–5481 (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.: Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science 275(5304), 1293–1295 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., Damasio, A.R.: Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral cortex 6(2), 215–225 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borst, C.V.: The Mind-Brain Identity Theory: A Collection of Papers. St Martin’s P., New York (1970)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Breazeal, C., Velasquez, J.: Robot in society: friend or appliance. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Autonomous Agents Workshop on Emotion-Based Agent Architectures, pp. 18–26 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Damasio, A.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Grosset/Putnam, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damasio, A.R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H.: Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing. Frontal Lobe Function and Dysfunction, 217–229 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gadanho, S., Hallam, J.: Emotion triggered learning for autonomous robots. DAI Research Paper (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giarratano, J.C., Riley, G.D.: Expert Systems: Principles and Programming. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gray, E.K., Watson, D., Payne, R., Cooper, C.: Emotion, mood, and temperament: Similarities, differences, and a synthesis. Emotions at work: Theory, research and applications for management, 21–43 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kiverstein, J., Miller, M.: The embodied brain: towards a radical embodied cognitive neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9, 237 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mazzei, D., Billeci, L., Armato, A., Lazzeri, N., Cisternino, A., Pioggia, G., Igliozzi, R., Muratori, F., Ahluwalia, A., De Rossi, D.: The face of autism. In: The 19th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2010, pp. 791–796. IEEE Computer Society publisher (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mazzei, D., Cominelli, L., Lazzeri, N., Zaraki, A., De Rossi, D.: I-CLIPS brain: a hybrid cognitive system for social robots. In: Duff, A., Lepora, N.F., Mura, A., Prescott, T.J., Verschure, P.F.M.J. (eds.) Living Machines 2014. LNCS, vol. 8608, pp. 213–224. Springer, Heidelberg (2014) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pally, R.: Emotional processing: The mind-body connection. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Russell, J.A.: The circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suzuki, A., Hirota, A., Takasawa, N., Shigemasu, K.: Application of the somatic marker hypothesis to individual differences in decision making. Biological Psychology 65(1), 81–88 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Velasquez, J.: Modeling emotion-based decision-making. Emotional and intelligent: The tangled knot of cognition, 164–169 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center “E. Piaggio”University of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations