Brazil’s Leadership Through Global Channels: Autonomy, Diversification and Acceptance

Part of the United Nations University Series on Regionalism book series (UNSR, volume 11)

Abstract

This chapter will focus on how the Lula administration strengthened its position as a regional leader through global governance channels. The author argues that international forums have become useful spaces for emerging powers to gain acceptance of their regional leadership from their neighbours. Brazil’s intent to lead in South America has been accompanied by strong activism in multilateral organizations. However, despite the fact that Brazil’s neighbours have timidly consented to its leadership of the region on particular issues of common interest, gaining this acceptance has been the hardest part of Brazil’s consolidation as a regional leader. Despite a general perception of acceptance there has been resistance from the other big regional players—like Argentina and Venezuela—towards key components of the Brazilian agenda abroad. Some of these trends have changed under Rousseff administration.

Keywords

Autonomy Diversification Acceptance Leadership G20 

References

  1. Almeida, P. R. D. (2002). O Brasil e o sistema de Bretton Woods: Instituições e políticas em perspectiva histórica, 1944–2002. En: O Brasil e os acordos econômicos internacionais: perspectivas jurídicas e econômicas. Sao Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, P. R. D. (2004). Uma política externa angajada: A diplomacia do governo Lula. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional, 47(1), 162–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, P. R. D. (2007). Brazil as a regional player and an emerging global power. FES Briefing Paper, Issue 8.Google Scholar
  4. Álvarez, R. (2010). La ONU y Lula Da Silva: ¿modernización o crisis?. América Economía, 31 Mayo.Google Scholar
  5. Anon (2009). Europapress. Cristina Fernández acuerda con Calderón y Zapatero respaldar la sesión del Consejo de Seguridad sobre Honduras, 25 Septiembre.Google Scholar
  6. Brazilian Ministry of Finance (2008). G-20 leaders’ meeting on financial markets and global economy. Brazilian Proposal. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
  7. Caixeta Arraes, V. (2005). O Brasil e o Conselho de Segurança da Organização das Nações Unidas: dos anos 90 a 2002. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 48(2), 152–168.Google Scholar
  8. Campos de Mello, F. (2000). Gionalismo e Insercao Internacional: Continuidade e Transformacao da Politica Exterior Brasileira dos Anos. Sao Paulo: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Cervo, A., & Lessa, C. (2014). Declínio: Inserção internacional do Brasil (2011–2014). Revista Brasilera de Política Internacional, 57(2), 133–151. doi:10.1590/0034-7329201400308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, A. F. (1997a). Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the cold war. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, A. F. (Ed.). (1997b). Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the cold war. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, A. (2009). Middle powers: Squeezed out or adaptive into new roles? Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 29.Google Scholar
  13. Da Silva, L. I. (2009). Speech at the 64th UN general assembly. New York: s.n. http://www.un.org/ga/64/generaldebate/pdf/BR_en.pdf
  14. dos Santos, F. P. (2005). Brazil’s remarkable journey. Finance and Development, 42(2), 429–430.Google Scholar
  15. Duarte Vila, R., & Trindade Viana, M. (2008). Política exterior brasileña: Nuevos y viejos caminos en los aspectos institucionales, en la práctica del multilateralismo y en la política para el sur. Revista de Ciencia Política, 28(2), 77–106.Google Scholar
  16. EFE World News Service (2009). Brazil, Argentina plan joint proposal at G-20 summit. 20th Mar.Google Scholar
  17. Fagundes Visentini, P. G., & Reis da Silva, A. L. (2010). Brazil and the economic, political, and environmental multilateralism: The Lula years (2003–2010). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53, 54–72.Google Scholar
  18. Forman, S., & Segaar, D. (2006). New coalitions for global governance: The changing dynamics of multilateralism. Global Governance, 12, 205–225.Google Scholar
  19. Gratius, S. (2007). Brasil en las Américas: ¿Una potencia regional pacificadora?. Documento de trabajo FRIDE, Issue 35.Google Scholar
  20. Grieco, J. (1995). State interests and institutional rule trajectories: A neorealist interpretation of the Maastricht treaty and European economic and monetary union. Review of International Studies, 21, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurria, A. (2004). The G20 at the leaders’ level?. IDRC Ottawa. February 29Google Scholar
  22. Hayes, G. (1994, Jan). Middle powers in the new world order. Behind the Headlines, 51(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  23. Hermann, M.G. & Hagan, J.D. (1998, Spring). ‘International decision making: Leadership matters’, Foreign policy, no. 110, Special edn.: Frontiers of knowledge, (pp. 124–137).Google Scholar
  24. Higgott, R. (1997). Issues, institutions and middle-power diplomacy: action and agendas in the post-cold war era. In Andrew F. Cooper (Ed.), Niche diplomacy: middle powers after the cold war. London: Macmillan. Google Scholar
  25. Hurrell, A. (2010). Brazil and the new global order. Current History, 109, 60–66.Google Scholar
  26. Ikenberry, J. (1998/1999). Strategic restrains, and the persistence of American postwar order. International Security, 23(3), 43–78.Google Scholar
  27. IMF (2011). World economic outlook. Sept. 2011. International Monetary Fund. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/02/weodata/index.aspx
  28. IMF (2014). Quota and voting shares before and after implementation of reforms agreed in 2008 and 2010. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx
  29. Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(1), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Keohane, R. (1969). Lilliputians’ dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Westview Press.Google Scholar
  32. Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1985). Two cheers for multilateralism. Foreign Policy, 60, 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kirton, J. (2005). From G-7 to G-20: Capacity, leadership and normative diffusion in global financial governance. International Studies Association Annual Convention. Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirton, J., & Guebert, J. (2009). A summit of substantial success: The performance of the G20 in Washington in 2008. Toronto: G-20 Research Group.Google Scholar
  35. Lafer, C. (2002). La identidad internacional del Brasil. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  36. Lechini, G. (2007). IBSA: Una opción de cooperación Sur-Sur. In Giron, Alicia; Correa, Eugenia (ed.): Del Sur hacia el Norte: Economía política del orden económico internacional emergente. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.Google Scholar
  37. Morgenthau, H. J. (1993) Politics among nations. The struggle for power and peace (Brief Edition). Revised by Thompson KW. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Mosser, M. (2000). Engineering influence: The subtle power of smaller states in international relations. UNC Graduate Conference. Google Scholar
  39. Narlikar, A., & Tussie, D. (2004). Developing countries and their evolving coalitions in the WTO. World Economy, 27(7), 947–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nolte, D. (2007, May). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research topics. In ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, Helsinki (vol. 7, p. 12).Google Scholar
  41. Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: Analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, 36, 881–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nye, J. S., Jr. (2005). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  43. Nye, J. (2006). Soft power, hard power and leadership. Harvard Seminar, 27th Octubre.Google Scholar
  44. Nye, J. (2008). Powers to lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Quiliconi, C. (2014). Competitive diffusion of trade agreements in Latin America. International Studies Review, 16(2), 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sachs, G. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050. Global Economics Paper, Issue 99.Google Scholar
  47. Schirm, S. (2007). Emerging power leadership in global governance: Assessing the leader-follower nexus for Brazil and Germany. Paper prepared for the ECPR joint session workshop on ‘The Rise of (New) Regional Powers in Global and Regional Politics’, European consortium for political research, 7–12 May.Google Scholar
  48. Schoeman, M. (2007). Sudafrica. En: India, Brasil y Sudáfrica: el impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales (pp. 55–96). Buenos Aires: Editorial Libros Del Zorza.Google Scholar
  49. Soares de Lima, M. R., & Hirst, M. (2006). Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: Action, choice and responsibilities. International Affairs, 82(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Teslik, L. H. (2009). Twenty agendas at G-20. Council on foreign relations, 1st Apr, Available at: http://www.cfr.org/economics/twenty-agendas-g-20/p18997#p3.
  51. The Economist (2005). Argentina, Brazil and the IMF. Kirchner and Lula: Different ways to give the Fund the kiss off. The Economist, 20th Dec.Google Scholar
  52. Tokatlian, J. (2007). India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal.Google Scholar
  53. Turzi, M. (2011). Que importancia tiene el BRIC? Estudios Internacionales, 168, 87–111.Google Scholar
  54. Riggirozzi, P., & Tussie, D. (2012). The rise of post-hegemonic regionalism: The case of Latin America. London/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Uchôa, P. (2010). Lula: Crise deixou FMI em ‘silêncio profundo’ e Banco Mundial ‘mudo’. BBC Brasil, 8 Jul.Google Scholar
  56. Vadell, J. & Lamas, B. (2010). The Brazilian leadership and the concentric circles of integration process: From South America to Latin America.Google Scholar
  57. Valladao, A. (2006). Brazil: An ambiguos leader. Paper prepared for the GIGA Conference on ‘Regional Powers in Asia, Latina America and the Middle East2, 11th–12th Dec.Google Scholar
  58. Vigevani, T., & Ramanzini (Jr), H. (2010). The changing nature of multilateralism and Brazilian foreign policy. The International Spectator, 45(4), 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walt, S. M. (1998). International relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weber, M. (1997). The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  61. Wood, B. (1987). Middle powers in the international system: A preliminary assessment of potential. WIDER.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsFLACSO-ArgentinaBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations