The IS Heritage and the Legacy of Ciborra

  • Paolo Depaoli
  • Andrea Resca
  • Marco De Marco
  • Cecilia Rossignoli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 13)

Abstract

Ten years is a good distance at which to assess Claudio Ciborra’s legacy to Information Systems Studies and Organizational Studies. The paper compares the scholar’s seminal work, The Labyrinths of Information, with the thematic papers published in 30 special issues/sections of four top IS journals. The results show clearly that Ciborra’s concepts have now gained much wider currency, especially in the study of phenomena such as local meaningful practices (e.g. bricolage, improvisation, cultivation). They contribute to the swing toward a more praxis-oriented attitude in the IS discipline.

Keywords

Information infrastructure Strategizing Platform organization Ontology Epistemology 

References

  1. 1.
    Thompson, M.: Ontological shift or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks, and theory generation in organization studies. Acad. Manag. Rev. 36, 753–773 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ciborra, C.: The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Baroudi, J.J.: Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(1), 1–28 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, W., Hirschheim, R.: A paradigmatic and methodological examination of information systems research from 1991 to 2001. Inf. Syst. J. 14(3), 197–235 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paucar-Caceres, A., Wright, G.: Contemporary discourses in Information Systems Research: Methodological inclusiveness in a sample of Information Systems Journals. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 31(6), 593–598 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bryant, A., Black, A., Land, F., Porra, J.: Information Systems history: What is history? What is IS history? What IS history? and why even bother with history? J. Inf. Technol. 28(1), 1–17 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crotty, M.: The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process, p. 176. Sage, London (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, p. 327. Free Press, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williamson, O.E.: The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, vol. 54, no. 171, pp. xiv, 450. Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Argyris, C.: Reasoning, Learning, and Action: Individual and Organizational, vol. 4, no. 16. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (1982)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ciborra, C.: The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organ. Sci. 7(2), 103–118 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Latour, B.: Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heidegger, M.: The question concerning technology. In: Farrell Krell, D. (ed.) Martin Hidegger Basic Writings, pp. 311–341. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sawyer, S., Winter, S.J.: Special issue on futures for research on information systems: Prometheus un-bound? J. Inf. Technol. 26(2), 95–98 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Orlikowski, W.J.: The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research. Cambridge J. Econ. 34(1), 125–141 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schultze, U.: Performing embodied identity in virtual worlds. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(1), 84–95 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schultze, U., Orlikowski, W.J.: Research commentary—virtual worlds: a performative perspective on globally distributed, immersive work. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 810–821 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dreyfus, H.L.: Being and power revisited. In: Milchman, A., Rosenberg, A., (eds.) Foucault and Heidegger–Critical Encounters, pp. 30–54. University of Minnesota Press (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nandhakumar, J., Rossi, M., Talvinen, J.: The dynamics of contextual forces of ERP implementation. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 14(2), 221–242 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Galliers, R.D., Jarvenpaa, S.L., Chan, Y.E., Lyytinen, K.: Strategic information systems: reflections and prospectives. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 85–90 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nolan, R.L.: Ubiquitous IT: the case of the boeing 787 and implications for strategic IT research. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 21(2), 91–102 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peppard J., Galliers R.D., Thorogood A.: Information systems strategy as practice: Micro strategy and strategizing for IS. J. Strategic Inf. Sys. 23(1), 1–10 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., Seidl, D.: Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective. Hum. relations 60(1), 5–27 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 18(7), 509–533 (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Henfridsson, O., Lind, M.: Information systems strategizing, organizational sub-communities, and the emergence of a sustainability strategy. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(1), 11–28 (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Walsham, G., Robey, D., Sahay, S.: Foreword: Special issue on information systems in developing countries. MIS Q. 31(2), 317–326 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Puri, S.K.: Integrating scientific with indigenous knowledge: constructing knowledge alliances for land management in india. MIS Q. 31(2), 355–379 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silva, L., Hirschheim, R.: Fighting against windmills: strategic information systems and organizational deep structures. MIS Q. 31(2), 327–354 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malhotra, A., Melville, N.P., Watson, R.T.: Spurring impactful research on information systems for environmental sustainability. MIS Q. 37(4), 1265–1274 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Depaoli
    • 1
  • Andrea Resca
    • 1
  • Marco De Marco
    • 2
  • Cecilia Rossignoli
    • 3
  1. 1.CeRSI-LUISS Guido Carli UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.UninettunoRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationUniversità degli Studi di VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations