Italy’s One-Stop Shop: A Case of the Emperor’s New Clothes?

  • Walter Castelnovo
  • Maddalena Sorrentino
  • Marco De Marco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 13)

Abstract

The setting up of municipal One-Stop Business Shops (SUAPs) plays a vital role in the Italian legislator’s work to simplify government relations with business and industry. The paper analyzes the outcome of the SUAP simplification programme launched in 1998 and, using secondary data sources, shows that not all the targets have been achieved. The paper’s findings indicate that the shortfall clearly can be attributed to the fact that the entire SUAP-centred simplification process has suffered from legislative overkill while neglecting to address the all-important practical side of implementation, and the impact of the new laws on the behaviour of the actors and the decision makers that populate the different levels of the country’s PA.

Keywords

Simplification e-Government One-stop government Administrative reform 

References

  1. 1.
    Bekkers, V.: The governance of back-office integration. Public Manag. Rev. 9, 377–400 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United Nations: E-Government Survey 2010. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    OECD: Italy: Reviving Growth and Productivity. OECD, Paris (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howard, C.: Rethinking Post-NPM Governance: The Bureaucratic struggle to implement one-stop-shopping for government services in Alberta. Public Organ. Rev. 1–18 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Irani, Z., Love, P.E.D., Elliman, T., Jones, S., Themistocleous, M.: Evaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities. Inf. Syst. J. 15, 61–82 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suppa, A., Zardini, A.: The Implementation of a performance management system in the Italian army. In: Zhou, M. (ed.) Education and Management, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 210, pp. 139–146. Springer, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wimmer, M.A.: A European perspective towards online one-stop government: the eGOV project. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 1, 92–103 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glassey, O.: Developing a one-stop government data model. Gov. Inf. Q. 21, 156–169 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bannister, F.: E-government and administrative power: the one-stop-shop meets the turf war. Electron. Gov., Int. J. 2, 160–176 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gouscos, D., Kalikakis, M., Legal, M., Papadopoulou, S.: A general model of performance and quality for one-stop e-Government service offerings. Gov. Inf. Q. 24, 860–885 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hogrebe, F., Kruse, W., Nüttgens, M.: One-stop e-Government for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME): A strategic approach and case study to implement the EU services directive. Bled 2008 Conference. Bled, Slovenia (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dameri, R.P.: Defining an evaluation framework for digital city implementation. In: The International Conference on Information Society (i-Society). London (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Charih, M., Robert, J.: Government on-line in the federal government of Canada: The organizational issues. Int. Rev. Admin. Sci. 70, 373–384 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    West, D.M.: e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Publ. Adm. Rev. 64, 15–27 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 24, 89–101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Colarullo, F., Di Mascio, R., Virili, F.: Meccanismi di coordinamento nei SUAP (Sportelli Unici per le Attività Produttive): il caso Enterprise. VII Workshop dei Docenti e dei Ricercatori di Organizzazione Aziendale, Salerno (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vaast, E., Binz-Scharf, M.C.: Bringing change in government organizations: evolution towards post-bureaucracy with web-based IT projects. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Paris (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spagnoletti, P., Za, S.: A design theory for e-Service Environments: The interoperability challenge. In: Snene, M. (ed.) IESS 2012. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ongaro, E.: Process management in the public sector: The experience of one-stop shops in Italy. Int. J. Publ. Sect. Manag. 17, 81–107 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kraemer, K., King, J.L.: Information technology and administrative reform: will e-government be different? Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 2, 1–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mele, V.: Explaining programmes for change: Electronic government policy in Italy (1993-2003). Publ. Manag. Rev. 10, 21–49 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leeuw, F.L., Leeuw, B.: Cyber society and digital policies: Challenges to evaluation? Evaluation 18, 111–127 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hansson, F., Norn, M.T., Vad, T.B.: Modernize the public sector through innovation? A challenge for the role of applied social science and evaluation. Evaluation 20, 244–260 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ricciardi, F., Rossignoli, C., De Marco, M.: Participatory networks for place safety and livability: organisational success factors. Int. J. Networking Virtual Organ 13, 42–65 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spagnoletti, P., Federici, T.: Exploring the Interplay between FLOSS adoption and organizational innovation. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 29, 279–298 (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janssen, M., Kuk, G., Wagenaar, R.W.: A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands. Gov. Inf. Q. 25, 202–220 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kohlborn, T., Weiss, S., Poeppelbuss, J., Korthaus, A., Fielt, E.: Online service delivery models—an international comparison in the public sector. In: Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). Brisbane, Australia (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Peters, C., Kohlborn, T., Korthaus, A., Fielt, E., Ramsden, A.: Service delivery in one-stop government portals–observations based on a market research study in Queensland. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS). Brisbane, Australia (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Braccini, A.M., Spagnoletti, P.: Defining cooperative business models for inter-organizational cooperation. Int. J. Electron. Commer. Stud. 3, 229–249 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Agranoff, R.: Human services integration: Past and present challenges in public administration. Publ. Adm. Rev. 51, 533–542 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Milward, H.B., Provan, K.G.: Governing the hollow state. J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor. 10, 359–379 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ho, A.T.K.: Reinventing local governments and the e-Government initiative. Publ. Adm. Rev. 62, 434–444 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bellamy, C.: Transforming social security benefits administration for the twenty-first century: Towards one-stop services and the client group principle? Publ. Adm. 74, 159–179 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Peters, B.G.: Managing horizontal government: The politics of co-ordination. Publ. Adm. 76, 295–311 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wilkins, P.: Accountability and Joined-up government. Aust. J. Publ. Adm. 61, 114–119 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pollitt, C.: Joined-up government: A survey. Polit. Stud. Rev. 1, 34–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pollitt, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public management reform. In: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, 3 ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J.: New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governance. J. Publ. Adm. Res. Theor. 16, 467–494 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Christensen, T., Lægreid, P.: Complexity and hybrid public administration -theoretical and empirical challenges. Publ. Organ. Rev. 11, 1–17 (2010)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Christensen, T., Lægreid, P.: The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Publ. Adm. Rev. 67, 1059–1066 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Howard, C., Langford, J.: The service state: Rhetoric, reality and promise, vol. 25. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bouckaert, G., Peters, B.G., Verhoest, K.: The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Christensen, T.: Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji J. Polit. Sci. Econ. 1, 1–11 (2012)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    McNulty, T., Ferlie, E.: Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organ. Stud. 25, 1389–1412 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuhlmann, S., Wollmann, H.: Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2014)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yin, R.K., Davis, D.: Adding new dimensions to case study evaluations: The case of evaluating comprehensive reforms. New Dir. Eval. 113, 75–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zardini, A., Rossignoli, C., Mola, L., De Marco, M.: Developing municipal e-Government in Italy: The city alfa case. In: Fifth International Conference on Exploring Services Science (IESS 2014). Geneva (2014)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Caporarello, L., Viachka, A.: Individual readiness for change in the context of enterprise resource planning system implementation. In: D’Atri, A., De Marco, M., Braccini, A.M., Cabiddu, F. (eds.) Management of the Interconnected World, pp. 89–96. Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mattarella, B.G., Natalini, A. (eds.): La regolazione intelligente. Un bilancio critico delle liberalizzazioni italiane. Passigli Editore, Bagno a Ripoli (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Capgemini IDC, Europe, R., Sogeti, DTi: Digitizing public services in Europe: Putting ambition into action: 9th benchmark measurement. Technical Report by European Commission (2010)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Castelnovo, W.: A country level evaluation of the impact of the e-government: the case of Italy. In: Gil-Garcia, J.R. (ed.) E-Government success factors and measures: concepts, theories, esperiences, and practical recommendations. IGI Global, Hershey (2013)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    PromoPA: Imprese e burocrazia. Come le piccole e micro imprese giudicano la Pubblica amministrazione. Franco Angeli, Milano (2013)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mola, L., Carugati, A.: Escaping ‘localisms’ in IT sourcing: tracing changes in institutional logics in an Italian firm. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 21, 388–403 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sorrentino, M., De Marco, M.: Implementing e-government in hard times: When the past is wildly at variance with the future. Inf. Polity 18, 331–342 (2013)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Battistelli, F.: Managerializzazione e retorica. In: Battistelli, F. (ed.): La cultura delle amministrazioni pubbliche fra retorica e innovazione, pp. 23–45. Franco Angeli, Milano (2002)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Luna-Reyes, L.F., Melloulib, S., Bertot, J.C.: Key factors and processes for digital government success. Inf. Polity 18, 101–105 (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pennarola, F., Caporarello, L.: Enhanced class replay: Will this turn into better learning? In: Wankel, C., Blessinger, P. (eds.) Increasing Student Engagement and Retention Using Classroom Technologies: Classroom Response Systems and Mediated Discourse Technologies, pp. 143–162. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley (2013)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sorrentino, M., Passerini, K.: Evaluating e–government initiatives: the role of formative assessment during implementation. Electron. Gov. 9, 28–141 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Castelnovo
    • 1
  • Maddalena Sorrentino
    • 2
  • Marco De Marco
    • 3
  1. 1.University of InsubriaVareseItaly
  2. 2.University of MilanMilanoItaly
  3. 3.International Telematic University UNINETTUNORomeItaly

Personalised recommendations