Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter focuses on epistemic differences between a range of learning theories, although these differences also reflect the boundary strengths, probative force and values given to those relations and entities that constitute learning. Four examples of learning theory are examined here: behaviourist, phenomenological, constructivist and materialist. In addition, two important elements of a learning theory, representation and emergence, are investigated, as these provide the means to distinguish between the different theories and further extend our understandings of learning.

Keywords

Social Constructivist Phenomenal Quality Knowledge Claim Social Object Ontological Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2010) ‘Three generations of complexity theories: nuances and ambiguities’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 1: 66–82.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backhurst, D. (2009) Reflections on Activity Theory, Education Review, 61(2), 197–210.Google Scholar
  4. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., & Henry, J. (1996). Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Education Research, 31, 445–457.Google Scholar
  5. Bhaskar, R. (1989). Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. (2002). Critical realism and marxism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Bredo, E. (1999) Reconstructing educational psychology, in P. Murphy (ed.) Learners, Learning and Assessment, London, Sage Publications, pp. 23–45.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, R. (2015) The Post-Human and Responsible Experimentation in Learning, in D. Scott and E. Hargreaves (2015) The Sage Handbook of Learning, London: SageGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacking, I. (2000). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M. (2002). The essence of human freedom: An introduction to philosophy (Ted Sadler, trans.). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962 [1945]). Phenomenology of perception. (Colin Smith, trans.). New York/London: Humanities Press/Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of strong emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Scott, D. (2010). Education, epistemology and critical realism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Taylor, C. (1998). Philosophy and the human sciences, philosophical papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviourism. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  25. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wenger, E. (2008). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning … in their own words. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Winogrand, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Scott
    • 1
  1. 1.Curriculum, Pedagogy & AssessmentUniversity College London Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations