Advertisement

High-Resolution Population Grids for the Entire Conterminous United States

  • Anna Dmowska
  • Tomasz F. StepinskiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

To have a more complete awareness of the global environment and how it changes, remotely sensed data pertaining to the physical aspects of the environment need to be complemented by broad-scale demographic data having high spatial resolution. Although such data are available for many parts of the world, there are none available for the United States. Here we report on our ongoing project to develop high-resolution (30–90 m/cell) population/demographic grids for the entire conterminous United States and to bring them into the public domain. Two different, dasymetric modeling-based approaches to disaggregation of block-level census data into a fine grid are described, and resulting maps are compared to existing resources. We also show how to utilize these methods to obtain racial diversity grids for the entire conterminous United States. Our nationwide grids of population and racial diversity can be explored using the online application SocScape at http://sil.uc.edu.

Keywords

Population grids Dasymetric modeling Demographic data 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Cincinnati Space Exploration Institute.

References

  1. Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Tech rep, Geological Survey Professional Paper 964Google Scholar
  2. Bhaduri B, Bright E, Coleman P, Dobson J (2002) LandScan: locating people is what matters. Geoinformatics 5(2):34–37Google Scholar
  3. Bhaduri B, Bright E, Coleman P, Urban ML (2007) LandScan USA: a high-resolution geospatial and temporal modeling approach for population distribution and dynamics. GeoJournal 69(1–2):103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen K, McAneney J, Blong R, Leigh R, Hunter L, Magill C (2004) Defining area at risk and its effect in catastrophe loss estimation: a dasymetric mapping approach. Appl Geogr 24(2):97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dmowska A, Stepinski TF (2014) High resolution dasymetric model of US demographics with application to spatial distribution of racial diversity. Appl Geogr 53:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobson JE, Bright EA, Coleman PR, Durfee RC, Worley BA (2000) LandScan: a global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 66(7):849–857Google Scholar
  7. Dong P, Sathya R, Nepali A (2010) Evaluation of small-area population estimation using LiDAR, Landsat TM and parcel data. Int J Remote Sens 31(2):5571–5586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eicher CL, Brewer CA (2001) Dasymetric mapping and areal interpolation: implementation and evaluation. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 28:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fry JA, Coan MJ, Homer CG, Meyer DK, Wickham JF (2009) Completion of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992–2001 land cover change retrofit product. Tech rep, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1379Google Scholar
  10. Gallego FJ (2010) A population density grid of the European Union. Popul Environ 31(6):460–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gallego FJ, Batista F, Rocha C, Mubareka S (2011) Disaggregating population density of the European Union with CORINE land cover. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(12):2051–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaughan AE, Stevens FR, Linard C, Jia P, Tatem AJ (2013) High resolution population distribution maps for Southeast Asia in 2010 and 2015. PLoS One 8(2):e55,882Google Scholar
  13. Goodchild M, Anselin L, Deichmann U (1993) A framework for the areal interpolation of socioeconomic data. Environ Plann A 25:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jia P, Qiu Y, Gaughan AE (2014) A fine-scale spatial population distribution on the high-resolution gridded population surface and application in Alachua County, Florida. Appl Geogr 50:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Langford M, Unwin D (1994) Generating and mapping population density surfaces within a geographical information system. Cartogr J 31(1):21–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Linard C, Gilbert M, Snow RW, Noor AM, Tatem AJ (2012) Population distribution, settlement patterns and accessibility across Africa in 2010. PLoS One 7(2):e31,743Google Scholar
  17. Mennis J (2003) Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. Prof Geogr 55(1):31–42Google Scholar
  18. Mennis J, Hultgren T (2006) Intelligent dasymetric mapping and its application to areal interpolation. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 33(3):179–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qiu F, Cromley R (2013) Areal interpolation and dasymetric modeling. Geogr Anal 45(3):213–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reibel M, Bufalino ME (2005) Street-weighted interpolation techniques for demographic count estimation in incompatible zone systems. Environ Plann A 37(1):127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tatem AJ, Noor AM, vonHagen C, DiGregorio A, Hay SI (2007) High resolution population maps for low income nations: combining land cover and census in East Africa. PLoS One 2(12):e1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Theobald DM (2014) Development and applications of a comprehensive land use classification and map for the US. PloS One 9(4):e94,628Google Scholar
  23. Weber N, Christophersen T (2002) The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process. For Policy Econ 4(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wright J (1936) A method of mapping densities of population: with Cape Cod as an example. Geogr Rev 26(1):103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Space Informatics Lab, Department of GeographyUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations