The Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Resources: Visions and Challenges in Spatial Computing

  • Emre Eftelioglu
  • Zhe Jiang
  • Xun Tang
  • Shashi Shekhar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)

Abstract

In the coming decades, the increasing world population is expected to increase the demand for food, energy, and water (FEW) resources. In addition, these resources will be under stress due to climate change and urbanization. Previously, more problems were caused by piecemeal approaches analyzing and planning those resources independent of each other. The goal of the FEW nexus approach is to prevent such problems by understanding, appreciating, and visualizing the interconnections and interdependencies of FEW resources at local, regional, and global levels. The nexus approach seeks to use the FEW resources as an interrelated system of systems, but data and modeling constraints make this a challenging task. Also, the lack of complete knowledge and observability of FEW interactions exacerbates the problem. Related work focuses on physical science solutions (e.g., desalination, biopesticides). No doubt these are necessary and worthwhile for FEW resource security. Spatial computing may help domain scientists achieve their goals for the FEW nexus. In this chapter, we describe our vision of spatial computing’s role in understanding the FEW nexus from a spatial data life cycle perspective. We provide details of each of the spatial computing components. For each component, we list new technical challenges that are likely to drive future spatial computing research.

Keywords

Food Energy and water nexus Spatial computing 

References

  1. Andrews-Speed P, Bleischwitz B, Boersma T, Johnson C, Kemp G, VanDeveer S (2014) Want, waste or war? The global resource nexus and the struggle for land, energy, food, water and minerals. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobenrieth E, Wright B (2009) The food price crisis of 2007/2008: evidence and implications. In: Joint meeting of the intergovernmental group on oilseeds, oils and fats (30th session), the intergovernmental group on grains (32nd session), and the intergovernmental group on rice (43rd session), Santiago, Chile, vol 4, no 11, pp 4–6Google Scholar
  3. Flammini A, Puri M, Pluschke L, Dubois D (2014) Walking the nexus talk: assessing the water-energy-food nexus in the context of the sustainable energy for all initiative. Environment and Natural Resources Management. Working Paper, FAOGoogle Scholar
  4. Geographical Sciences Committee (2014) Advancing land change modeling: opportunities and research requirements. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Group on Earth Observations System of Systems Portal (GEOSS) (2015) http://www.geoportal.org/web/guest/geo_home_stp. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  6. Healy R, Alley W, Engle M, McMahon P, Bales J (2015) The water-energy nexus: an earth science perspective. US Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidemann J, Stojanovic M, Zorzi M (2012) Underwater sensor networks: applications, advances and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A: Math Phys Eng Sci 370(1958):158–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoekstra A, Hung P (2002) Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of water research report series, no 11, IHE DelftGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoff H (2011) Understanding the nexus. Background paper for the Bonn 2011 Nexus Conference. http://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=1977. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  10. Holger H (2011) Understanding the nexus: background paper for the Bonn 2011 nexus conference. http://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=1977. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  11. Housh M, Cai X, Ng T, Mclsaac G, Ouyang Y, Khanna M, Sivapalan M, Jain A, Eckhoff S, Gasteyer S, Al-Qadi I (2014) System of systems model for analysis of biofuel development. J Infrastruct Syst 21(3):9385–9404Google Scholar
  12. Justice C (2013) The GEO Global Agricultural Monitoring Initiative (GEOGLAM): overview. http://lcluc.umd.edu/Documents/ScienceTeamMtg/2013_NOV/presentations/GEOGLAM_OverviewTashkent.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  13. Lautenbacher C (2006) The global earth observation system of systems: science serving society. Space Policy 22(1):8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McBratney A, Whelan B, Ancev T, Bouma J (2005) Future directions of precision agriculture. Precis Agric 6(1):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meadows D (2008) Thinking in systems: a primer. Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, VTGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller W (2012) Introducing geodesign: the concept. https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/introducing-geodesign.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  17. Mohtar R, Daher B (2012) Water, energy, and food: the ultimate nexus. In: Encyclopedia of agricultural, food, and biological engineering. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, NY http://wefnexus.tamu.edu/files/2015/01/Mohtar-Daher_Water-Energy-and-Food-The-Ultimate-Nexus.pdf/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  18. National Intelligence Council (NIC) (2012) Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. National Intelligence Council, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2014) Food, energy, and water: transformative research opportunities in the mathematical and physical sciences http://www.nsf.gov/mps/advisory/mpsac_other_reports/nsf_food_security_report.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  20. National Science Foundation (NSF) (2015) Dear colleague letter: SEES: interactions of food systems with water and energy systems. http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15040/nsf15040.jsp. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  21. NRC (2014) Advancing land change modeling: Opportunities and research. http://nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18385
  22. Plant R, Pettygrove G, Reinert W (2000) Precision agriculture can increase profits and limit environmental impacts. Calif Agric 54(4):66–71. doi:10.3733/ca.v054n04p66 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rabalais N, Turner R, Wiseman W Jr (2002) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia, AKA “the dead zone”. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:235–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R, Hunkeler D, Norris G, Rydberg T, Schmidt W, Suh S, Weidema B, Pennington D (2004) Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30(5):701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott C, Kurian M, Wescoat J Jr (2015) The water-energy-food nexus: enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges. In: Kurian M, Ardakanian R (eds) Governing the nexus. Springer International Publishing, Berlin, Germany, pp 15–38Google Scholar
  26. Shekhar S, Feiner S, Aref W (2016) Spatial computing: accomplishments, opportunities, and research needs. United Nations Environment Programme. https://nexusobservatory.flores.unu.edu. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  27. USGS (2015) U.S. Geological Survey Web Site. http://www.usgs.gov. Accessed 30 Sept 2015
  28. UNU-FLORES (2015) Nexus Observatory platform website. https://nexusobservatory.flores.unu.edu
  29. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2016) Life cycle assessment (2016) http://www.unep.org/resourceefficiency/Consumption/StandardsandLabels/MeasuringSustainability/LifeCycleAssessment/tabid/101348/Default.aspx. Accessed 29 Jan 2016
  30. Webber M (2015) Energy, water and food problems must be solved together. Sci Am 312(2) http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/energy-water-and-food-problems-must-be-solved-together/. Accessed 30 Sept 2015

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emre Eftelioglu
    • 1
  • Zhe Jiang
    • 1
  • Xun Tang
    • 1
  • Shashi Shekhar
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations