Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 248-255 | Cite as

Augmented Happiness: Simple Color Changes Influence Users’ Conceptual Choices

  • Diana Löffler
  • Wolfgang Paier
  • Takashi Toriizuka
  • Mio Ikeda
  • Jörn Hurtienne
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9299)

Abstract

Color is a powerful visual property and is used to make interferences about the world. However, no theoretical framework is available that explains precisely where color associations come from and how they affect psychological functioning, making it difficult to predict how color affects human-computer interaction. This paper aims at closing this gap by suggesting an Embodied Cognition view on color, which assumes that the aggregate of our perceptual color experiences is part of the mental representation of tactile object attributes and thus systematically influences our abstract thinking via the process of metaphorical mapping. An empirical study is presented in which hues and saturation of objects were manipulated via Augmented Reality. Participants matched objects to abstract concepts, e.g., happiness. 83 % of the participants’ choices were correctly predicted, suggesting that color information is considered during the processing of abstract information. Eight color-to-abstract-concept mappings are recommended and possible areas of application are discussed.

Keywords

Augmented reality Color Embodied cognition Conceptual metaphor 

References

  1. 1.
    Alexander, K.R., Shansky, M.S.: Influence of hue, value, and chroma on the perceived heaviness of colors. Percept. Psychophys. 19(1), 72–74 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ban, Y., Narumi, T., Fujii, T., Sakurai, S., Imura, J., Tanikawa, T., and Hirose, M. Augmented Endurance: Controlling Fatigue while Handling Objects by Affecting Weight Perception using Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 69–77. ACM Press (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonnardel, N., Piolat, A., Le Bigot, L.: The impact of colour on Website appeal and users’ cognitive processes. Displays 32(2), 69–80 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cant, J.S., Large, M.E., McCall, L., Goodale, M.A.: Independent processing of form, color and texture in object perception. Perception 37, 57–78 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng, K.M.: Quantitative evaluation of colour emotions (Doctoral dissertation, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, A.: Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elliot, A.J., Maier, M.A.: Color and psychological functioning. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16(5), 250–254 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glenberg, A.M.: Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 1(4), 586–596 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ho, H.N., Iwai, D., Yoshikawa, Y., Watanabe, J., Nishida, S.Y.: Combining colour and temperature: a blue object is more likely to be judged as warm than a red object. Scientific reports, 4 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho, H.N., Van Doorn, G.H., Kawabe, T., Watanabe, J., Spence, C.: Colour-temperature correspondences: when reactions to thermal stimuli are influenced by colour. PLoS ONE 9(3), e91854 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hurtienne, J., Horn, A.-M., Langdon, P.M., Clarkson, P.J.: Facets of prior experience and the effectiveness of inclusive design. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 12, 3 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurtienne, J., Stößel, C. and Weber, K. Sad is Heavy and Happy is Light – Population Stereotypes of Tangible Object Attributes. In: Proceedings of TEI 2009, pp. 61–68. ACM Press (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jalil, N.A., Yunus, R.M., Said, N.S.: Environmental colour impact upon human behaviour: a review. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 35, 54–62 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jostmann, N.B., Lakens, D., Schubert, T.W.: Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychol. Sci. 20(9), 1169–1174 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Löffler, D.: Population stereotypes of color attributes for tangible interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pp. 285–288. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rother, C., Kolmogorov, V., Blake, A.: “GrabCut”: interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. In: SIGGRAPH 2004, pp. 309–314. ACM Press (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shankar, M.U., Levitan, C.A., Spence, C.: Grape expectations the role of cognitive influences in color-flavor interactions. Conscious Cogn. 19(1), 380–390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valdez, P., Mehrabian, A.: Effects of color on emotions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123(4), 394–409 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Walker, P., Francis, B.J., Walker, L.: The brightness-weight illusion: darker objects look heavier but feel lighter. Exp. Psychol. 57(6), 462 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whitfield, T.W., Whiltshire, T.J.: Color psychology: a critical review. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 116(4), 385–411 (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xiao, K., Li, C.J., Luo, M.R., Taylor, C.: Colour appearance for dissimilar sizes. Conf. Colour Graph. Imaging Vis. 20(1), 12–16 (2004). Society for Imaging Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xiao, K., Luo, M.R., Li, C., Cui, G., Park, D.: Investigation of colour size effect for colour appearance assessment. Color Res. Appl. 36(3), 201–209 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Löffler
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Paier
    • 2
  • Takashi Toriizuka
    • 3
  • Mio Ikeda
    • 3
  • Jörn Hurtienne
    • 1
  1. 1.Chair of Psychological ErgonomicsUniversity of WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer HHIComputer Vision and GraphicsBerlinGermany
  3. 3.College of Industrial TechnologyNihon UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations