Worth-Centered Design in Practice: Lessons from Experience and Research Agenda
Worth-Centered Design (WCD) provides designers with six principles, five “D”s, a framework, and a set of tools, techniques, and methods for designing interactive systems that deliver worth. Despite its potential, WCD has not received much attention: the related literature is not intensive and the design methodology has not been investigated in many actual design settings. The community lacks of experience with WCD.
This paper first compiles the state-of-the-art on WCD and then relates the worth-centered design of Cocoon, a mobile and context-aware application. It presents further insights about the notion of worth and provides the community with nine lessons from experience for informing future worth-centered designs. Worth maps appear as a treasure also for worth assessment over time, giving rise to the ARROW (Appreciations, Requirements and Rationale Of Worth) framework and research perspectives.
We warmly thank Orange Labs (Lannion) for its support to this work.
- 1.Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Weerdmeester, B., Thomas, A., Mclelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
- 3.Cockton, G.: Value-centred HCI. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2004, pp. 149–160. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
- 4.Cockton, G.: A development framework for value-centred design. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2005, pp. 1292–1295. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Cockton, G.: Designing worth is worth designing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, NordiCHI 2006, pp. 165–174. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Cockton, G.: Sketch worth, catch dreams, be fruity. In: CHI 2008, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2008, pp. 2579–2582. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Cockton, G.: Getting there: six meta-principles and interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, pp. 2223–2232. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
- 10.Cockton, G., Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Banks, R.: Evolving and augmenting worth mapping for family archives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology, BCS-HCI 2009, pp. 329–338. British Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Cockton, G., Kujala, S., Nurkka, P., Hölttä, T.: Supporting worth mapping with sentence completion. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 566–581. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp 1177–1201. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (2003)Google Scholar
- 16.Otero, N., José, R.: Considering worth and human values in the design of digital public displays. In: Symonds, J. (ed.) Emerging Pervasive and Ubiquitous Aspects of Information Systems: Cross-Disciplinary Advancements, pp. 248–260 (2011)Google Scholar
- 17.Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretation. J. Advertising Res. 28, 11–31 (1988)Google Scholar
- 18.Roto, V.: User Experience from Product Creation Perspective. Towards a UX Manifesto Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
- 19.Vu, P.: A worth centered development approach to information management system design. Master thesis, Aalto University, p. 107 (2013)Google Scholar