Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 123-139 | Cite as

Worth-Centered Design in Practice: Lessons from Experience and Research Agenda

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9299)

Abstract

Worth-Centered Design (WCD) provides designers with six principles, five “D”s, a framework, and a set of tools, techniques, and methods for designing interactive systems that deliver worth. Despite its potential, WCD has not received much attention: the related literature is not intensive and the design methodology has not been investigated in many actual design settings. The community lacks of experience with WCD.

This paper first compiles the state-of-the-art on WCD and then relates the worth-centered design of Cocoon, a mobile and context-aware application. It presents further insights about the notion of worth and provides the community with nine lessons from experience for informing future worth-centered designs. Worth maps appear as a treasure also for worth assessment over time, giving rise to the ARROW (Appreciations, Requirements and Rationale Of Worth) framework and research perspectives.

References

  1. 1.
    Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Weerdmeester, B., Thomas, A., Mclelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor and Francis, London (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camara, F., Calvary, G., Demumieux, R.: The PEW framework for worth mapping. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 667–674. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cockton, G.: Value-centred HCI. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2004, pp. 149–160. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cockton, G.: A development framework for value-centred design. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2005, pp. 1292–1295. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cockton, G.: Designing worth is worth designing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles, NordiCHI 2006, pp. 165–174. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cockton, G.: Designing worth – connecting preferred means to desired ends. Interactions 15(4), 54–57 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cockton, G.: Putting value into evaluation. In: Law, E., et al. (eds.) Maturing Usability. Human Computer Interaction Series, pp. 287–317. Springer, London (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cockton, G.: Sketch worth, catch dreams, be fruity. In: CHI 2008, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2008, pp. 2579–2582. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cockton, G.: Getting there: six meta-principles and interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, pp. 2223–2232. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cockton, G., Kirk, D., Sellen, A., Banks, R.: Evolving and augmenting worth mapping for family archives. In: Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology, BCS-HCI 2009, pp. 329–338. British Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cockton, G., Kujala, S., Nurkka, P., Hölttä, T.: Supporting worth mapping with sentence completion. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 566–581. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, B.: Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3(6), 16–23 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H.: Human values, ethics, and design. In: The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, pp 1177–1201. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Friedman, B., Kahn Jr., P.H., Borning, A., Huldtgren, A.: Value sensitive design and information systems. In: Doorn, N., et al. (eds.) Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory, pp. 55–95. Springer, Netherlands (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gutman, J.: A means-end chain model based on consumer categorization processes. J. Mark. 46, 60–72 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Otero, N., José, R.: Considering worth and human values in the design of digital public displays. In: Symonds, J. (ed.) Emerging Pervasive and Ubiquitous Aspects of Information Systems: Cross-Disciplinary Advancements, pp. 248–260 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reynolds, T.J., Gutman, J.: Laddering theory, method, analysis and interpretation. J. Advertising Res. 28, 11–31 (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roto, V.: User Experience from Product Creation Perspective. Towards a UX Manifesto Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vu, P.: A worth centered development approach to information management system design. Master thesis, Aalto University, p. 107 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LIGGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LIGGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations