Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 110-128 | Cite as

Prototyping TV and Tablet Facebook Interfaces for Older Adults

  • José Coelho
  • Fábio Rito
  • Nuno Luz
  • Carlos Duarte
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9296)

Abstract

With the daily problem of social isolation comes an aggravation of older adults’ general health. Social Network Services like Facebook have the potential to ameliorate the social connectivity of this segment of the population. However, they are still not fully adopted by them, whether because of age-related limitations or the lack of appropriate technological skills. In this paper we argue that the development of SNSs based on technology already used by older adults, like Television, or technology which has proven to be more accessible to them, like Tablets, can improve the ability of older adults to use these systems. We report findings from a study composed of semi-structured interviews and focus groups which aimed at the development of two Facebook-based prototypes for TV and Tablet. Results show good receptiveness from older adults to perform social tasks on TV and Tablet-based applications, for interacting using alternative modalities like speech, or back-of-device tapping, and for the use of adaptation mechanisms. Informed by the study results the main contributions are the two prototypes, and a collection of recommendations regarding the design of TV and tablet based interfaces for this population.

Keywords

Facebook Older adults Social isolation Tablet Television Semi-structured interviews Focus groups Participatory design Prototyping 

References

  1. 1.
    Top 15 Most Popular Social Networking Sites — January 2015 (2015). http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites
  2. 2.
    Alaoui, M., Lewkowicz, M.: A LivingLab approach to involve elderly in the design of smart TV applications offering communication services. In: Ozok, A., Zaphiris, P. (eds.) OCSC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8029, pp. 325–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bobeth, J., Schmehl, S., Kruijff, E., Deutsch, S., Tscheligi, M.: Evaluating performance and acceptance of older adults using freehand gestures for TV menu control. In: EuroiTV 2012, pp. 35–44. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bobeth, J., Schrammel, J., Deutsch, S., Klein, M., Drobics, M., Hochleitner, C., Tscheligi, M.: Tablet, gestures, remote control?: influence of age on performance and user experience with iTV applications. In: TVX 2014, pp. 139–146 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, M., Kraut, R., Marlow, C.: Social capital on facebook: differentiating uses and users. In: CHI 2011, pp. 571–580 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, Y.: Usability analysis on online social networks for the elderly. Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coelho, J., Biswas, P., Duarte, C., Guerreiro, T., Langdon, P., Feiteira, P., Costa, D., Costa, D., Neves, B., Alves, F.: Involving all stakeholders in the development of TV applications for elderly. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Syst. 5(3–4), 427–440 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coelho, J., Duarte, C., Biswas, P., Langdon, P.: Developing accessible TV applications. In: ASSETS 2011, pp. 131–138. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cornejo, R., Tentori, M., Favela, J.: Enriching in-person encounters through social media: a study on family connectedness for the elderly. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 71(9), 889–899 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cornwell, E.Y., Waite, L.J.: Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study. J. Gerontol. 64B(suppl 1), i38–i46 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J.: Personalized input: improving ten-finger touchscreen typing through automatic adaptation. In: Proceedings of CHI 2012. pp. 815–824. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gajos, K.Z., Wobbrock, J.O., Weld, D.S.: Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users’ motor and vision capabilities. In: UIST 2007, pp. 231–240 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garattini, C., Wherton, J., Prendergast, D.: Linking the lonely: an exploration of a communication technology designed to support social interaction among older adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(2), 211–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gaver,W., Boucher, A., Bowers, J., Blythe, M., Jarvis, N., Cameron, D., Kerridge, T., Wilkie, A., Phillips, R., Wright, P.: The photostroller: Supporting diverse care home residents in engaging with the world. In: CHI 2011, pp. 1757–1766. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, L., Moncur, W., Forbes, P., Arnott, J., Martin, C., Bhachu, A.S.: Designing social networking sites for older adults. pp. 186–194. British Computer Society (BCS), UK (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomes, G., Duarte, C., Coelho, J., Matos, E.: Designing a facebook interface for senior users, Sci. World J., Article ID 741567, p. 8 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Grosinger, J., Vetere, F., Fitzpatrick, G.: Agile life: addressing knowledge and social motivations for active aging. In: OzCHI 2012, pp. 162–165 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harrison, B.L., Fishkin, K.P., Gujar, A., Mochon, C., Want, R.: Squeeze me, hold me, tilt me! an exploration of manipulative user interfaces. In: CHI 1998 pp. 17–24 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Judge, T.K., Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Blose, A.: Family portals: Connecting families through a multifamily media space. In: CHI 2011 pp. 1205–1214 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karahasanovi, A., Brandtzg, P.B., Heim, J., Lders, M., Vermeir, L., Pierson, J., Lievens, B., Vanattenhoven, J., Jans, G.: Co-creation and user-generated contentelderly peoples user requirements. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(3), 655–678 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lindley, S.E., Harper, R., Sellen, A.: Desiring to be in touch in a changing communications landscape: attitudes of older adults. In: Proceedings of CHI 2009, pp. 1693–1702 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindley, S.E.: Shades of lightweight: supporting cross-generational communication through home messaging. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 11(1), 31–43 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McLaughlin, A.C., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.: Using direct and indirect input devices: attention demands and age-related differences. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16(1), 2:1–2:15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Norval, C., Arnott, J.L., Hanson, V.L.: What’s on your mind?: Investigating recommendations for inclusive social networking and older adults. In: CHI 2014, pp. 3923–3932. ACM, NY (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rekimoto, J.: Tilting operations for small screen interfaces. In: UIST 1996, pp. 167–168 (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robinson, S., Rajput, N., Jones, M., Jain, A., Sahay, S., Nanavati, A.: Tapback: Towards richer mobile interfaces in impoverished contexts. In: CHI 2011, pp. 2733–2736 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stephanidis, C., Paramythis, A., Sfyrakis, M., Stergiou, A., Maou, N., Leventis, A., Paparoulis, G., Karagiannidis, C.: Adaptable and adaptive user interfaces for disabled users in the avanti project. In: IS&N 1998, pp. 153–166 (1998)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stobel, C., Blessing, L.: Mobile device interaction gestures for older users. In: NordiCHI 2010, pp. 793–796 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., Downs, J.: Older adults as digital content producers. In: Proceedings of CHI 2013, pp. 39–48. ACM (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Coelho
    • 1
  • Fábio Rito
    • 1
  • Nuno Luz
    • 1
  • Carlos Duarte
    • 1
  1. 1.LaSIGEUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations