Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 340-348 | Cite as

ReservoirBench: An Interactive Educational Reservoir Engineering Workbench

  • Sowmya Somanath
  • Allan Rocha
  • Hamidreza Hamdi
  • Ehud Sharlin
  • Mario Costa Sousa
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9296)

Abstract

ReservoirBench is an interactive workbench for educational geological science and engineering tasks. It is designed to facilitate education of novice audiences to teach them basic concepts of reservoir modeling and simulation workflow. Traditional training using lectures and software practice can lead to information overload, and retainability is questionable. As an alternative, we propose a physical workbench that is coupled with digital augmentation for the purpose of learning. We take advantage of the crucial role that spatiality and 3D representations play in petroleum reservoir modeling and allow basic domain concepts to be introduced and explored in a tangible and experiential manner. We describe the design of our prototype and reflect on the findings from our preliminary design critique.

Keywords

Physical user interface Education Design Reservoir engineering 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Boxcut – Phil and Tyson Skit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_EYUtEp-oo/
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Allen, G., Chakraborty, P., Huang, D., Lei, Z., Lewis, J., Li, X., White, C. D., Xu, X., Zhang, C.: A workflow approach to designed reservoir study. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science, pp. 75–79 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barsalou, L.W.: Grounded Cognition. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617–645 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bransford, J.D., Schwartz, D.L.: Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education 24, 61–100 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Couture, N., Rivière, G., Reuter, P.: GeoTUI: a tangible user interface for geoscience. In: Proceedings of TEI 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dake, L.P.: Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fjeld, M., Voegtli, B.M.: Augmented chemistry: an interactive educational workbench. In: Proceedings of ISMAR 2002, pp. 259–321 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris, J., Young, J., Sultanum, N., Lapides, P., Sharlin, E., Sousa, M.C.: Designing Snakey: a tangible user interface supporting well path planning. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part III. LNCS, vol. 6948, pp. 45–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI 1997, pp. 232–241 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., Takayama, L.: How bodies matter: fives themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of DIS 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marshall, P.: Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In: Proceedings of TEI 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    O’Malley, C., Fraser, D.S., et al.: Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. NESTA Futurelab, Bristol (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Piper, B., Ratti, C., Ishii, H.: Illuminating clay: a 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pugsley, K.E., Clayton, L.H.: Traditional lecture or experiential learning: changing student attitudes. J. Nurs. Educ. 42(11), 520–523 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Specht, L.B., Sandlin, P.K.: The different effects of experiential learning activities and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simul. Gaming 22(2), 196–210 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Soc. Stud. Sci. 19(3), 387–420 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sultanum, N., Sharlin, E., Sousa M.C., Miranda-Filho, D.N., Eastick, R.: Touching the depths: introducing tabletop interaction to reservoir engineering. In: Proceedings of ITS 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tateosian, L., Mitasova, H., et al.: TanGeoMS: tangible geospatial modeling system. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 16, 1605–1612 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ullmer, B., Ishii, H.: Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Syst. J. 39(3–4), 915–931 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, T., Suen, C.Y.: A fast parallel algorithm for thinning digital patterns. ACM Commun. 27(3), 236–239 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sowmya Somanath
    • 1
  • Allan Rocha
    • 1
  • Hamidreza Hamdi
    • 1
  • Ehud Sharlin
    • 1
  • Mario Costa Sousa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations