Eery Space: Facilitating Virtual Meetings Through Remote Proxemics
Virtual meetings have become increasingly common with modern video-conference and collaborative software. While they allow obvious savings in time and resources, current technologies add unproductive layers of protocol to the flow of communication between participants, rendering the interactions far from seamless. In this work we introduce Remote Proxemics, an extension of proxemics aimed at bringing the syntax of co-located proximal interactions to virtual meetings. We propose Eery Space, a shared virtual locus that results from merging multiple remote areas, where meeting participants’ are located side-by-side as if they shared the same physical location. Eery Space promotes collaborative content creation and seamless mediation of communication channels based on virtual proximity. Results from user evaluation suggest that our approach is sufficient to initiate proximal exchanges regardless of their geolocation, while promoting smooth interactions between local and remote people alike.
KeywordsRemote Proxemics Virtual meetings Collaboration
This work was partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the projects TECTON-3D (PTDC/EEI-SII/3154/2012), CEDAR (PTDC/EIA-EIA/116070/2009), doctoral grant SFRH/BD/91372/2012 and by national funds through FCT with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013.
- 1.Apperley, M., McLeod, L., Masoodian, M., Paine, L., Phillips, M., Rogers, B., Thomson, K.: Use of video shadow for small group interaction awareness on a large interactive display surface. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Australasian User Interface Conference on User Interfaces 2003, vol. 18, pp. 81–90. Australian Computer Society, Inc., February 2003Google Scholar
- 3.Benko, H., Jota, R., Wilson, A.: MirageTable: freehand interaction on a projected augmented reality tabletop. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 199–208. ACM, May 2012Google Scholar
- 4.Cohen, M., Dillman, K.R., MacLeod, H., Hunter, S., Tang, A.: Onespace: shared visual scenes for active freeplay. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2177–2180. ACM, April 2014Google Scholar
- 5.Hall, E.T.: The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday, New York (1966)Google Scholar
- 6.Marquardt, N., Ballendat, T., Boring, S., Greenberg, S., Hinckley, K.: Gradual engagement: facilitating information exchange between digital devices as a function of proximity. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 31–40. ACM, November 2012Google Scholar
- 7.Marquardt, N., Hinckley, K., Greenberg, S.: Cross-device interaction via micro-mobility and f-formations. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 13–22. ACM, October 2012Google Scholar
- 8.Neyfakh L.: My day as a robot, May 2014. http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2014/05/10/day-robot/6UAMgmUFn0mZhoMS8vy0GK/story.html
- 9.Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Tele-vision, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
- 10.Sommer, R.: Personal space in a digital age. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, pp. 647–660. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar