Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 45-52 | Cite as

Breathe with Touch: A Tactile Interface for Breathing Assistance System

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9298)

Abstract

Breathing techniques have been widely used as an aid in stress-reduction and relaxation exercises. Most breathing assistance systems present breathing guidance in visual or auditory forms. In this study, we explored a tactile interface of a breathing assistance system by using a shape-changing airbag. We hypothesized that it would help users perform the breathing exercise more effectively and enhance their relaxing experience. The feasibility of the tactile interface was evaluated from three aspects: stress reduction, breathing training and interface usability. The results showed that for most participants, the overall heart rate variability were improved after breathing training. Moreover, “Breathe with Touch” brought users better satisfaction during the exercise. We discuss these results and future design implications for designing tactile interfaces for breathing guidance.

Keywords

Tactile interface Biofeedback Breathing assistance Relaxation 

References

  1. 1.
    Gilbert, C.: Clinical applications of breathing regulation. beyond anxiety management. J. Behav. Modif. 27(5), 692–709 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gevirtz, R.: Resonant frequency training to restore homeostasis for treatment of psychophysiological disorders. J. Biofeedback 27, 7–9 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qin, Y., Vincent, C.J., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., Shi, Y.: AirFlow: designing immersive breathing training games for COPD. In: CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2419−2424. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris, J., Vance, S., Fernandes, O., Parnandi, A., Gutierrez-Osuna, R.: Sonic respiration: controlling respiration rate through auditory biofeedback. In: CHI 2014 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2383–2388. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hale, K.S., Stanney, K.M.: Deriving haptic design guidelines from human physiological, psychophysical, and neurological foundations. J. Comput. Graph. Appl. IEEE 24(2), 33–39 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gallace, A., Spence, C.: The science of interpersonal touch: an overview. J. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(2), 246–259 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dijk, E.O., Weffers, A.: Breathe with the ocean: a system for relaxation using audio, haptic and visual stimuli. Spec. Symp. EuroHaptics 2010, 50–60 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaschillo, E.G., Vaschillo, B., Lehrer, P.M.: Characteristics of resonance in heart rate variability stimulated by biofeedback. J. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 31(2), 129–142 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marteau, T.M., Hilary, B.: The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the spielberger state—trait anxiety inventory (STAI). J. Brit. J. Clin. Psychol. 31(3), 301–306 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. J. Usability Interface 8(2), 3–6 (2001)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muench, F.: The portable stresseraser heart rate variability biofeedback device: background and research. J. Biofeedback 36(1), 35–39 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial Design DepartmentTechnology University of EindhovenEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations