Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 132-148 | Cite as

An Empirical Investigation of the Practices and Challenges Specific to International User Studies

  • Sabine Madsen
  • Lene Nielsen
  • Heidi Hautopp
  • Iben Jensen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9298)

Abstract

In today’s globalized world, it is increasingly important for companies to gain knowledge about international markets and to understand the differences and similarities between international users. As a result, international user studies have become more common. However, they still pose a challenge for most companies. In this paper, we present the results of an empirical investigation of how companies conduct international user studies. We describe the empirical findings in detail, with an emphasis on the practices and challenges that are specific to the process of doing international user studies. Key findings concern where, geographically, companies choose to collect data; the scope and scale of the studies; as well as the preferred data collection methods and employed control mechanisms. Our research shows that strategic/pragmatic considerations, perceived differences in national culture, and concerns about data quality shape and delimit the approach that companies take to international user studies.

Keywords

Design International user studies Application Practice-study 

References

  1. 1.
    Boztepe, S.: Toward a framework of product development for global markets: a user-value-based approach. Des. Stud. 28, 513–533 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camara, S.B., Oyugi, C., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Smith, A.: Augmenting usability: cultural elicitation in HCI. In: Katre, D., Orngreen, R., Yammiyavar, P., Clemmensen, T. (eds.) HWID 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 316, pp. 46–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clemmensen, T., Roese, K.: An overview of a decade of journal publications about culture and human-computer interaction (HCI). In: Katre, D., Orngreen, R., Yammiyavar, P., Clemmensen, T. (eds.) HWID 2009. IFIP AICT, vol. 316, pp. 98–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gabriel, Y.: Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions And Fantasies. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gertsen, M.C., Søderberg, A.M.: Intercultural collaboration stories: on narrative inquiry and analysis as tools for research in international business. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 42, 787–804 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kvale, S.: InterView. Hans Reitzel (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jensen, I.: Introduction to Cultural Understanding. Roskilde University Press, Frederiksberg (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jensen, I.: If culture is practice …? a practice theoretical perspective on intercultural communication and mediation. In: Finch, J., Nynäs, P. (eds.) Transforming Otherness, pp. 9–34. Transaction publishers, New Jersey (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marcus, A., Gould, E.: Cultural dimensions and global user-interface design: What? So What? Now What? In: 6th Conference on Human Factors and the Web (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, L., Hansen, K.S: Personas is applicable: a study on the use of personas in denmark. In: Proceedings of CHI2014, pp. 1665–1674. ACM, Toronto (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Risberg, A., Søderberg, A.M., Tienari, J., Vaara, E.: National talk: the construction of national stereotypes in a merging multinational. In: Søderberg, A.M., Vaara, E. (eds.) Merging Across Borders: People, cultures and politics, pp. 61–86. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Putnam, C., Rose, E., Johnson, E.J., Kolko, B.: Adapting user-centered design methods to design for diverse populations. Inf. Technol. Int. Dev. 5(4), 51–73 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schumacher, R.: The Handbook of Global User Research. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siegel, D.A., Dray, S.M.: International contextual field research. In: Douglas, I., Liu, Z. (eds.) Global Usability, pp. 57–88. Springer, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walsh, T., Vainio, T., Varsaluoma, J.: Cross-cultural design of mobile mathematics learning service for South African schools. In: Proceedings of Mobile Learning, 2014 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Young, P.A.: Integrating culture in the design of ICTs. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 39(1), 6–17 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Madsen
    • 1
  • Lene Nielsen
    • 1
  • Heidi Hautopp
    • 2
  • Iben Jensen
    • 2
  1. 1.IT University of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark
  2. 2.Aalborg UniversityCopenhagen SVDenmark

Personalised recommendations