Placing a New Science: Exploring Spatial and Temporal Configurations of Synthetic Biology
Synthetic biology is a field that can be and often is described as “emerging”. The field-in-emergence is creating futures, problems and new objects that remain elusive. By turning an ethnographic gaze on the nascent stages of a new research field, we can pose interesting questions about the formation of local configurations and their relations to wider policies and actions in ways that the analysis of established fields would struggle to illuminate. In this paper we explore how a new field such as synthetic biology is actively ‘placed’, tracing the development of the field in the UK and in France. The concept of ‘placing’ allows us to interrogate the local configurations of an emerging field and tie these into non-local manoeuvres. The concept permits us to comprehend and link entities that are commonly differentiated as “local” (universities, research teams), “national” (funding, policy-streams, public debates, platforms), and “non-local” (international competitions, international conferences and publications). Placing a science means that the practices and discourses of the science co-emerge with its modes of organisation and geographies and with its histories and futures.
KeywordsSynthetic biology Placing Emergence Policy France United Kingdom Public dialogues iGEM
- Balmer, A., and P. Martin. 2008. Synthetic biology: Social and ethical challenges. An independent review commissioned by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Swindon: BBSRC.Google Scholar
- Groupe de travail “Biologie de synthèse”. 2011. Biologie de synthèse: développements, potentialités et défis. Paris: Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche.Google Scholar
- IFRIS. 2011. Biologie de synthèse: conditions d’un dialogue avec la société. Report for the Science and Society section of the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research, November 2011.Google Scholar
- Jensen, C.B. 2010. Ontologies for developing things: Making health care futures through technology. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Képès, F. 2012. Biologie de synthèse: la science de toutes les ruptures. Biotech Finances 539: 6–7.Google Scholar
- Marcus, G.E. 1998. Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Meyer, M. 2013. Debating synthetic biology: A necessity or a masquerade? CSI Research Blog, July 2013. http://www.csi.mines-paristech.fr/blog/en/?p=36. Accessed 15 July 2013.
- OPECST [Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques]. 2012. Les enjeux de la biologie de synthèse. Paris: OPECST.Google Scholar
- Ophir, A., and S. Shapin. 1991. The place of knowledge: A methodological survey. Science in Context 4: 3–21.Google Scholar
- Powell, A., M. O’Malley, S. Müller-Wille, J. Calvert, and J. Dupré. 2007. Disciplinary baptisms: A comparison of the naming stories of genetics, molecular biology, genomics and systems biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29: 5–32.Google Scholar
- Robbins, P. 2009. The genesis of synthetic biology: Innovation, interdisciplinarity and the IGEM student competition. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 8–11 Aug 2009.Google Scholar
- Royal Academy of Engineering. 2009. Synthetic biology: Scope, applications and implications. http://www.raeng.org.uk/societygov/policy/current_issues/synthetic_biology/default.htm. Accessed 7 June 2013.
- SNRI. 2009. Stratégie Nationale de Recherche et d’Innovation: Rapport Général. Paris: French Ministry of Higher Education and Research.Google Scholar
- SNRI. 2011. Stratégie Nationale de Recherche et d’Innovation. Biologie de Synthèse: Développements, Potentialités et Défis. Paris: French Ministry of Higher Education and Research.Google Scholar
- Synthetic Biology Dialogue. 2010. Report published by BBSRC, EPSRC and Sciencewise. http://bbsrc.ac.uk/society/dialogue/activities/synthetic-biology/findings-recommendations.aspx. Accessed 7 June 2013.
- Willetts, D. 2013. Eight great technologies. Pamphlet produced by Policy Exchange. http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/publications/category/item/eight-great-technologies. Accessed 7 June 2013.
- Zhang, J., C. Marris, and N. Rose. 2011. The international governance of synthetic biology: Scientific uncertainty, cross-borderness and the ‘art’ of governance. Working paper prepared for the Royal Society Science Policy Centre, May 2011.Google Scholar