Human-Computer Interaction

INTERACT 2015: Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015 pp 55-72 | Cite as

An Artifact Ecology in a Nutshell: A Distributed Cognition Perspective for Collaboration and Coordination

  • Christina Vasiliou
  • Andri Ioannou
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9297)

Abstract

An artifact ecology is an environment where multiple heterogeneous technologies co-exist and are interlinked as a unified system. To construct effective ecologies of artifacts for collaborative activities we need to acquire deep understanding of the complex interactions and interdependencies between users and tools. Researchers have identified Distributed Cognition (DC) as a powerful tool for understanding these interdependencies. In this study, DC, and particularly the DiCoT framework, were considered ideal for constructing this understanding for four student-groups during collaborative activities in an artifact ecology. Using DiCoT we analysed learners’ behaviour and how the artifact ecology supported collaboration and cooperation. The cognitive system was described from three different perspectives - physical layout, information flow and artifacts - which (i) allowed an in-depth understanding of the interactions among learners and tools during collaborative activities and (ii) provided insights on how the affordances of the artifact ecology supported collaboration and coordination.

Keywords

Distributed cognition DiCoT framework Artifact ecology Technology-rich workspace HCI education Collaboration Coordination 

References

  1. 1.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265(3), 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan, W., Thompson, T., Siegel, M.: Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? In: Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges, pp. 201–210 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bødker, S., Klokmose, C.N.: Dynamics in artifact ecologies. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design, pp. 448–457 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loke, S.W., Ling, S.: Analyzing observable behaviours of device ecology workflows. In: ICEIS (4), pp. 78–83 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salomon, G.: Effects with and of computers and the study of computer-based learning environments. In: De Corte, E., Linn, M.C., Mandl, H., Verschaffel, L. (eds.) Computer-Based Learning Environments and Problem Solving, pp. 249–263. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Halverson, C.A.: Activity theory and distributed cognition: Or what does CSCW need to Do with theories? Comput. Support. Coop. Work 11, 243–267 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogers, Y.: Coordinating computer-mediated work. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 1(4), 295–315 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blandford, A., Furniss, D.: DiCoT: a methodology for applying distributed cognition to the design of teamworking systems. In: Gilroy, S.W., Harrison, M.D. (eds.) DSV-IS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3941, pp. 26–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsch, D.: Distributed cognition: Towards a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7(2), 174–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hutchins, E., Klausen, T.: Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In: Engström, Y., Middleton, D. (eds.) Cognition and Communication at Work, pp. 15–34. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nobarany, S., Haraty, M., Fisher, B.: Facilitating the reuse process in distributed collaboration: a distributed cognition approach. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1223–1232. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rogers, Y.: HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics. Morgan and Claypool, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Beyer, H., Holtzblatt, K.: Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Furniss, D., Blandford, A.: DiCoT modeling: from analysis to design. In: Proceedings of CHI 2010 Workshop Bridging the Gap: Moving from Contextual Analysis to Design, pp. 10–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajkomar, A., Blandford, A.: Distributed cognition for evaluating healthcare technology. In: Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 341–350. British Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajkomar, A., Blandford, A.: Understanding infusion administration in the ICU through Distributed Cognition. J. Biomed. Inform. 45(3), 580–590 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharp, H., Robinson, H.: Collaboration and co-ordination in mature eXtreme programming teams. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 66(7), 506–518 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hilliges, O., Terrenghi, L., Boring, S., Kim, D., Richter, H., Butz, A.: Designing for collaborative creative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, pp. 137–146. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rick, J.: Towards a classroom ecology of devices: interfaces for collaborative scripts. In: Workshop Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2009): “Scripted vs. Free CS collaboration: alternatives and paths for adaptable and flexible CS scripted collaboration” (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bardill, A., Griffiths, W., Jones, S., Fields, B.: Design tribes and information spaces for creative conversations. In: The 12th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huang, E.M., Mynatt, E.D., Trimble, J.P.: Displays in the wild: understanding the dynamics and evolution of a display ecology. In: Fishkin, K.P., Schiele, B., Nixon, P., Quigley, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3968, pp. 321–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Looi, C.K., Wong, L.H., Song, Y.: Discovering mobile computer supported collaborative learning. In: Berge, Z.L., Muilenburg, L.Y. (eds.) The International Handbook of Collaborative Learning. Routledge, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martinez-Maldonado, R., Clayphan, A., Ackad, C., Kay, J.: Multi-touch technology in a higher-education classroom: lessons in-the-wild. In: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design, pp. 220–229. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Koschmann, T., Stahl, G.: Learning issues in problem-based learning: Situating collaborative information. In: CSCW Workshop on Technologies for Collaborative Information Seeking. ACM (1998)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hmelo-Silver, C.E.: Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(3), 235–266 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ioannou, A., Vasiliou, C., Zaphiris, P., Arh, T., Klobučar, T., Pipan, M.: Creative multimodal learning environments and blended interaction for problem-based activity in HCI education. TechTrends 59(2), 47–56 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vasiliou, C., Ioannou, A., Zaphiris, P.: Technology enhanced PBL in HCI education: a case study. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 8120, pp. 643–650. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Savery, C., Hurter, C., Lesbordes, R., Cordeil, M., Graham, T.: When paper meets multi-touch: a study of multi-modal interactions in air traffic control. In: Kotzé, P., Marsden, G., Lindgaard, G., Wesson, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8119, pp. 196–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Higgins, S.E., Mercier, E., Burd, E., Hatch, A.: Multi-touch tables and the relationship with collaborative classroom pedagogies: A synthetic review. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collaborative Learn. 6(4), 515–538 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dillenbourg, P., Evans, M.: Interactive tabletops in education. IJCSCL 6(4), 491–514 (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., Rogers, Y.: Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children’s collaborative interactions? In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 1, pp. 335–344 (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ioannou, A., Zaphiris, P., Loizides, F., Vasiliou, C.: Let’S Talk About Technology for Peace: A Systematic Assessment of Problem-Based Group Collaboration Around an Interactive Tabletop. Interacting with Computers, iwt061 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina Vasiliou
    • 1
  • Andri Ioannou
    • 1
  • Panayiotis Zaphiris
    • 1
  1. 1.Cyprus Interaction LabCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations