Influence of the Management Protocols on the LTE Self-configuration Procedures’ Performance

  • Mariusz Slabicki
  • Krzysztof Grochla
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 363)


The performance of SNMP, NETCONF and CWMP in LTE self-configuration scenario is investigated. The time required to perform the autoconfiguration of the LTE eNodeB is evaluated and a part of the LTE SON procedures. The influence of the size of the firmware file and the number of nodes being configured by a singe network management server is verified. The results show that the SNMP significantly outperforms NETCONF and CWMP in terms of time required to finish the self-configuration, especially for base stations with small firmware size.



This work was funded by the Polish National Centre for Research and Development, under research grant nr LIDER/10/194/L-3/11/: project “Optimization and load balancing in next generation wireless networks”,


  1. 1.
    3GPP: Telecommunication management; self-configuration of network elements; concepts and requirements. TS 32.501, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) (2013).
  2. 2.
    3GPP: Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; Stage 2. TS 36.300, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) (2014).
  3. 3.
    Barbieri, A., Damnjanovic, A., Ji, T., Montojo, J., Wei, Y., Malladi, D., Song, O., Horn, G.: Lte femtocells: system design and performance analysis. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 30(3), 586–594 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brik, V., Stroik, J., Banerjee, S.: Debugging dhcp performance. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, pp. 257–262. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eisenblatter, A., Gonzalez Rodriguez, B., Gunnarsson, F., Kurner, T., Litjens, R., Sas, B., Sayrac, B., Schmelz, L.C., Willcock, C.: Integrated self-management for future radio access networks: vision and key challenges. In: Future Network and Mobile Summit (Future Network Summit), 2013, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Enns, R., Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J.: Netconf configuration protocol. Network (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Foremski, P., Gorawski, M., Grochla, K.: Source model of tcp traffic in lte networks. In: Information Sciences and Systems 2014, pp. 125–135. Springer International Publishing (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grochla, K., Buga, W., Dzierzega, J., Pacyna, P., Seman, A.: Autoconfiguration procedures for multiradio wireless mesh networks based on dhcp protocol. In: IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks & Workshops, 2009, WoWMoM 2009, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Group, D.W., et al.: TR-069 CPE WAN Mangement Protocol Issue: 1 Amendment 5 version 1.4 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hedstrom, B., Watwe, A., Sakthidharan, S.: Protocol Efficiencies of NETCONF versus SNMP for Configuration Management Functions. Ph.D. thesis, Masters thesis, University of Colorado (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, H., Zhang, J., Zheng, X., Yang, Y., Wu, P.: Self-configuration and self-optimization for lte networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 48(2), 94–100 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, R.B.: Evaluating the use of SNMP as a wireless network monitoring tool for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. ProQuest (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jorguseski, L., Pais, A., Gunnarsson, F., Centonza, A., Willcock, C.: Self-organizing networks in 3g pp: standardization and future trends. IEEE Commun. Mag. 52(12), 28–34 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kantorovitch, J., Mahonen, P.: Case studies and experiments of SNMP in wireless networks. In: 2002 IEEE Workshop on IP Operations and Management, pp. 179–183. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paper, C.W.: Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2010–2015 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Połys, K., Grochla, K.: Mobility robustness in lte based on automatic neighbor relation table. In: Computer Networks, pp. 232–241. Springer International Publishing (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramiro, J., Hamied, K.: Self-Organizing Networks (SON): Self-Planning, Self-Optimization and Self-Healing for GSM, UMTS and LTE. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sehgal, A., Perelman, V., Kuryla, S., Schonwalder, J.: Management of resource constrained devices in the Internet of Things. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50(12), 144–149 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Słabicki, M., Grochla, K.: Performance evaluation of snmp, netconf and cwmp management protocols in wireless network. In: Amir Hussain, M.I. (ed.) Electronics, Communications and Networks IV: Proceedings of the 4th Internationa Conference on Electronics, Communications and Networks, 12–15 December 2014, Beijing, China. CRC Press (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stallings, W.: SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3, and RMON 1 and 2. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Varga, A., et al.: The OMNeT++ discrete event simulation system. In: Proceedings of the European Simulation Multiconference (ESM2001), vol. 9, p. 185. sn (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical and Applied InformaticsPolish Academy of SciencesGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations