Engineering Active Learning in 3D Virtual Worlds

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 533)

Abstract

To advance education in the 21st century, experts in neuroscience argue for more ‘active learning’ through experience. A practical implementation for such active, experiential and, we propose, multi-disciplinary learning is for students to consider, analyze, solve and make personal meaning from engaging problems. Collaborative problem-solving promotes communication involving creative and interpretive meaning-making, analysis and reflective judgement. Due to advances in computer technologies, educators can now consider a wider range of collaborative problems and extensive solutions which can be implemented in both real and virtual worlds. This paper will summarise five scenarios of virtual worlds from our research project: Second Life, OpenSim, OpenQwaq, Unity 3D and Unity 3D with Oculus Rift. In each virtual world participants from Japan, UK and USA have been engaged in remote collaborations to solve problem-based tasks requiring the programming and manouvering of virtual robots and real-world LEGO Mindstorms robots. Robot Mediated Interactions are analyzed to determine robot task complexity, student learning and task immersion. We have determined that for effective active learning involving 3D virtual worlds specifically focusing upon the development of beginner programming knowledge, the challenge is for educators to design tasks of zero (or close to zero) Task Fidelity and for students to become fully immersed within the tasks. The paper explains how this has been achieved, summarizes the benefits, obstacles, limitations and challenges of 3D virtual world implementations, and suggests future directions in educational research to engineer active learning in 3D virtual worlds.

Keywords

Computer science education Virtual worlds Robot task complexity Learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R., Airasian, P.W., Cruicshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., Wittrock, M.C.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: a Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloom, B.S. (ed.): Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York (1956)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. Touchstone, New York (1938)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hase, S.: Learner defined curriculum: heutagogy and action learning in vocational training. Southern Institute of Technology J. Appl. Res., Special Edition: Action research and action learning in vocational education and training. http://sitjar.sit.ac.nz/SITJAR/Special. Accessed 16 August 2014
  5. 5.
    Battro, A.M., Fischer, K.W., Lena, P.J.: The Educated Brain: Essays in Neuroscience. Cambridge University Press, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harel, I., Papert, S.: Constructionism. Ablex publishing, USA (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarricone, P.: The Taxonomy of Metacognition. Psychology Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barr, V., Stephenson, C.: Bringing computational thinking to k-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads 2(1), 48–54 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lui, A.K., Ng, S.C., Cheung, H.Y., Gurung, P.: Facilitating independent leaning with LEGO Mindstorms robots. ACM Inroads 1(4), 49–53 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vallance, M., Martin, S.: Assessment and learning in the virtual world: tasks, taxonomies and teaching for real. J. Virtual Worlds Res. 5(2), 1–13 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy, R., Schreckenghost, D.: Survey of metrics for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Tokyo, pp. 197–198 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vallance, M., Yamamoto, T., Goto, Y., Ibayashi, K.: Task fidelity: a new metric for measuring task complexity involving robots. IEEE Comput. Soc. Tech. Com. Learn. Technol. 15(4), 22–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vallance, M., Martin, S., Naamani, C.: A situation that we had never imagined: post-Fukushima virtual collaborations for determining robot task metrics. Int. J. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 30–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pearce, M., Ainley, M., Howard, S.: The ebb and flow of online learning. Comput. Hum. Behav. 21, 745–771 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Controlling Robots 6,000 Miles Away? No Problem! Posted by Laura_Arnold on 15 March 2012 at National Instruments Developer Zone. https://decibel.ni.com/content/groups/sweet-apps/blog/2012/03/15/controlling-robots-6000-miles-away-no-problem. Accessed 24 March 2015
  17. 17.
    Wallace, P., Vallance, M.: Global virtual team collaboration utilizing a 3D virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Technology in the Classroom (actc), Kobe, 30 April 2015–3 May 2015Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vallance, M., Naamani, C., Thomas, M., Thomas, J.: Applied information science research in a virtual world simulation to support robot mediated interaction following the fukushima nuclear disaster. Commun. Inf. Sci. Manage. Eng. (CISME) 3(5), 222–232 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gabriel, C.: personal communication, 9 December 2014. gabriel.campitelli@gmail.comGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F.: The quality of experience in the flow channels. In: Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (eds.) Optimal Experience: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vallance, M., Naamani, C.: Experiential learning, virtual collaboration and robots. In: Jerry, P., Tavares-Jones, N., Gregory, S. (eds.) Riding the Hype Cycle: The Resurgence of Virtual Worlds. Inter-Disciplinary Press (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media ArchitectureFuture University HakodateHakodateJapan

Personalised recommendations