Crisis Management and Context

Abstract

Successful management of critical situations created by major natural and man-made activities requires monitoring, recognizing, fusing, and making sense of these activities in order to support decision makers in either preventing a crisis or acting effectively to mitigate its adverse impact. Context plays an important role in crisis management since it provides decision makers with important knowledge about current situations and situation dynamics in relation to their goals, functions, and information needs, to enable them to appropriately adapt their decisions and actions. Efficient context exploitation for crisis management requires a clear understanding of what context is, how to represent it and use it. The chapter provides a brief discussion of the key issues of the problem of context definition, representation, discovery, and utilization in crisis management.

References

  1. Akman V, Surav M (1997) The use of situation theory in context modeling. Comp Intell 13:3Google Scholar
  2. Bettini C, Brdiczka O, Henricksen K, Indulska J, Nicklas D, Ranganathan A, Riboni D (2010) Asurvey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Perv Mob Comput 6(2):161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brézillon P (2003) Context dynamic and explanation in contextual graphs. In: Blackburn P et al (eds) CONTEXT 2003, vol LNAI 2680. Springer, New York, NY, pp 94–106Google Scholar
  4. Brézillon P, Pomerol J-C (1999) Contextual knowledge sharing and cooperation in intelligent assistant systems. Le Travail Humain 62(3):223–246Google Scholar
  5. Brezzilon P (1999) Context in problem solving: a survey. Knowl Eng Rev 14(1):47–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Devlin K (1991) Logic and information. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, CambridgeMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Dey A (2001) Understanding and using context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 5(1):4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gong L (2005) Contextual modeling and applications. In: Proc IEEE International Conference on SMC, vol V1. IEEE, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen FV (1996) An introduction to Bayesian networks. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  10. Josephson J (1990) On the logical form of abduction. In: AAAI Spring symposium series: automated abduction. AAAI, Menlo Park, CA, pp 140–144Google Scholar
  11. Kalyan A, Gopalan S, Sridhar V (2005) Hybrid context model based on multilevel situation theory and ontology for contact centers. In: Proc of the 3rd Int’l Conf on Pervasive computing and communications workshops (PerCom 2005 Workshops). IEEE, Washington, DC, pp 3–7Google Scholar
  12. Kokar M, Matheus CJ, Baclawski K (2009) Ontology-based situation awareness. Inf Fusion 10:83–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leech G (1981) Semantics: the study of meaning, 2nd edn. Penguin books, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  14. Liggins ME, Hall DL, Llinas J (eds) (2009) Handbook of multisensor data fusion. CRC Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Little EG, Rogova G (2009) Designing ontologies for higher level fusion. Inf Fusion 10:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCarthy J (1993) Notes on formalizing context. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference in Artificial intelligence, Chambery, France, pp 555–560Google Scholar
  17. Rogova G (2009) Context awareness in crisis management. In: Proc of the IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM 2009), 18–21 October 2009, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Rogova G, Steinberg A (in press) Formalization of context in information fusion. In: Snidaro L, Garcia J, Llinas J, Blasch E (eds.), Context enhanced information fusion, New York, NY: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogova G, Scott P, Lollett C, Mudiyanur R (2006) Reasoning about situations in the early post-disaster response environment. In: Proc 9th International Conference on Information fusion, FUSION 2006, July 10–13, 2006Google Scholar
  20. Smets P, Kennes R (1994) The transferable belief model. Artif Intell 66:191–243CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Stang T, Linnhoff-Popien C (2004) A context modeling survey. In: First International Workshop on Advanced context modelling, reasoning and management, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Steinberg A (2008) Foundations of situation and threat assessment, Chapter 26. In: Liggins M, Hall D, Llinas J (eds) Handbook of multisensor data fusion. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  23. Steinberg AN, Rogova GL (2008) Situation and context in data fusion and natural language understanding. In: Proc Eleventh International Conference on Information fusion, CologneGoogle Scholar
  24. Thagard P, Shelley CP (1997) Abductive reasoning: logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In: Dalla Chiara M-L et al (eds) Logic and scientific methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations