Abstract

Ignorance is an extreme form of uncertainty. In most narrow and technical sense, it means inability to assign a meaningful probability to the phenomena of interest. In more general sense, the state of ignorance is the result of the absence of knowledge about structural factors that influence the issues, the lack of reliable information or inability to completely determine the space of alternatives and consequences. We argue that the practice of casually papering over the ignorance with subjective judgments and analytic assumptions can have serious consequences. This chapter provides a structured survey (and necessarily selective) of significant ideas and proposals for decision making under ignorance, from the ground breaking work by Hurwicz and Arrow to the latest result of τ-anchor utility theory. A careful analysis and isolation of ignorance in the system of knowledge about a subject or a problem is of particular importance in the context of risk assessment and risk management.

References

  1. Arrow KJ, Hurwicz L (1977) An optimality criterion for decision making under ignorance. In: Arrow KJ, Hurwicz L (eds) Studies in resource allocation processes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aven T, Steen R (2010) The concept of ignorance in a risk assessment and risk management context. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:1117–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbera S, Bossert W, Pattanaik PK (2004) Ranking sets of objects. In: Barbera S, Hammond P, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory: extensions, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 893–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen M, Jaffray J-Y (1980) Rational behavior under complete ignorance. Econometrica 48(5):1281–1299CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Congar R, Maniquet F (2010) A trichotomy of attitudes for decision-making under complete ignorance. Math Soc Sci 59:15–25CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellsberg D (1961) Risk, ambiguity and the Savage’s axioms. Q J Econ 75(4):643–669CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Epstein LG (1999) A definition of uncertainty aversion. Rev Econ Stud 66:579–608CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Giang PH (2011) Dynamic consistency and decision making under vacuous belief. In: Cozman FG, Pfeffer A (eds) Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: proceedings of the 27nd conference (UAI–2011). AUAI Press, pp 230–237Google Scholar
  9. Gilboa I, Postlewaite A, Schmeidler D (2009) Is it always rational to satisfy Savage’s axioms? Econ Philos 25:285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graham DA (2014) Rumsfeld’s knowns and unknowns: the intellectual history of a quip. Atl Mag. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/03/rumsfelds-knowns-and-unknowns-the-intellectual-history-of-a-quip/359719/
  11. Gravel N, Marchant T, Sen A (2012) Uniform expected utility criteria for decision making under ignorance or objective ambiguity. J Math Psychol 56:297–315CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Health and Safety Executive (UK) (2001) Reducing risks, protecting people: HSE’s decision-making process. HSE Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hogarth RM, Kunreuther H (1995) Decision making under ignorance: arguing with yourself. J Risk Uncertain 10:15–36CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Keynes JM (1921) A treatise on probability. Macmillan, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifllin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. Maskin E (1979) Decision-making under ignorance with implications for social choice. Theor Decis 11:319–337CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Nehring K, Puppe C (1996) Continuous extensions of an order on a set to the power set. J Econ Theory 68:456–479CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Nitzan S, Pattanaik PK (1984) Median-based extensions of an ordering over a set to the power set: an axiomatic characterization. J Econ Theory 34:252–261CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Puppe C, Schlag KH (2009) Choice under complete uncertainty when outcome spaces are state dependent. Theor Decis 66:1–16CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Pushkarskaya H, Liu X, Smithson M, Joseph JE (2010) Beyond risk and ambiguity: deciding under ignorance. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10(3):382–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shackle GLS (1949) Expectations in economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Smets P (2005) Decision making in the TBM: the necessity of the pignistic transformation. Int J Approx Reason 38(2):133–147CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior, 3rd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Walley P (1996) Inferences from multinomial data: learning about a bag of marbles. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58(1):3–57MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations