Abductive Inferencing for Integrating Information from Human and Robotic Sources


Abductive inference (best-explanation reasoning) is a useful conceptual framework for analyzing and implementing the inferencing needed to integrate information from human and robotic sources. Inferencing proceeds from reports, to explanations for these reports, given in terms of hypothesized real-world entities and the processes by which the entities lead to the reports. Reports from humans and robotic sources are subject to different kinds of corruption, so they require different treatment as sources of evidence. The best explanation for a certain report might be that it presents a reliable statement that results from a chain of causality from the events reported, to their effects on human or robotic senses, and from there through transduction, processing, and reporting. Confidence in this explanation will be undercut by evidence supporting a rival explanation, such as one involving error or intended deception.


  1. Bharathan V, Josephson J (2006) An abductive framework for level one information fusion. In:Fusion 2006: The 9th International Conference on Information Fusion, Florence, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  2. Hanson NR (1958) Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Harman G (1965) The inference to the best explanation. Philos Rev 74:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobbs JR, Stickel M, Appelt D, Martin P (1993) Interpretation as abduction. Artif Intell J 63:69–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Josephson JR, Josephson SG (eds) (1996) Abductive inference: computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Lipton P (2004) Inference to the best explanation, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  7. Pantaleev A, Josephson J (2006) Higher-level fusion for military operations based on abductive inference: proof of principle. In: Conference on Multisensor, multisource information fusion: architectures, algorithms, and applications, part of The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE) Defense and Security Symposium, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  8. Peirce CS (1955) Abduction and induction. In: Buchler J (ed) Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  9. Peng Y, Reggia JA (1990) Abductive inference models for diagnostic problem solving. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Plato. Theaetetus.Google Scholar
  11. Schum D, Morris J (2007) Assessing the competence and credibility of human sources of intelligence evidence: contributions from law and probability. Law Probabil Risk 6:247–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Walton D (2004) Abductive reasoning. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, ALGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering DepartmentThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations