Modeling for Policy Formulation: Causal Mapping, Scenario Generation, and Decision Evaluation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9249)

Abstract

In this paper we present a work process with associated operational research modeling and analysis tools for the policy formulation stage of the Lindblom policy cycle process model. The approach exploits the use of causal maps for problem structuring and scenario generation of policy options together with decision analysis for evaluating generated scenarios taking preferences of decision makers and stakeholders into account. The benefits of interest when exploiting this integrated modeling approach is to enable for; (i) problem structuring and facilitating understanding and communication of a complex policy problem, (ii) simulation of policy consequences and identification of a smaller set of policy options from a possible very large set of possible options, and (iii) structured decision evaluation of the generated alternative policy options.

Keywords

Policy analysis Impact assessment Policy modelling Problem structuring Dynamic simulation Causal mapping Scenario planning Decision analysis 

References

  1. Acar, W.: Toward a Theory of Problem Formulation and the Planning of Change: Causal Mapping and Dialectical Debate in Situation Formulation. U.M.I, Ann Arbor (1983)Google Scholar
  2. Acar, W., Druckenmiller, D.: Endowing cognitive mapping with computational properties for strategic analysis. Futures 38, 993–1009 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axelrod, R.: The cognitive mapping approach to decision making. In: Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision, pp. 221–250. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)Google Scholar
  4. Bero, L.A., Jadad, A.R.: How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making. Ann. Intern. Med. 727(1), 37–42 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, R.: Rational Choice and Judgment: Decision Analysis for the Decider. Wiley, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant, B.P., Lempert, R.J.: Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer-assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 77, 34–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryson, J.M.: What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Manag. Rev. 6(1), 21–53 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comes, T., Hiete, M., Wijngaards, N., Schultmann, F.: Decision maps: a framework for multi-criteria decision support under severe uncertainty. Decis. Support Syst. 52, 108–118 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L., Idefeldt, J., Larsson, A.: Using a software tool for public decision analysis: the case of Nacka municipality. Decis. Anal. 4(2), 76–90 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Druckenmiller, D.A., Acar, W.: An agent-based collaborative approach to graphing causal maps for situation formulation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(3), 3 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Fasth, T., Kalinina, M., Larsson, A.: Admissibility concepts for group portfolio decision analysis. In: Proceedings of GDN 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. Franco, L.A., Montibeller, G.: Problem structuring for multicriteria decision analysis interventions. In: Cochran, et al. (eds.) Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Hansson, K., Larsson, A., Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: Coping with complex environmental and societal flood risk management strategies: an integrated multi-criteria framework. Sustainability 3(9), 1357–1380 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hamilton, A.: Policy formulation – critique, analysis and strategic implications, in new voices: essays on the policy process. JSGS Student Working Paper Series, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy (2010)Google Scholar
  15. Franco, L.A., Montibeller, G.: Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 205, 489–500 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., Perl, A.: Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Subsystems. Oxford, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  17. Kilgour, D.M., Chen, Y., Hipel, K.W.: Multiple criteria approaches to group decision and negotiation. In: Ehrgott, et al. (eds.) Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  18. Larsson, A., Johansson, J., Ekenberg, L., Danielson, M.: Decision analysis with multiple objectives in a framework for evaluating imprecision. Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 13, 495–510 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindblom, C.: The Policy-Making Process. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1968)Google Scholar
  20. Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J.: Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited: Problem Structuring Methods for Complexity, Uncertainty and Conflict. Wiley, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  21. Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J.: Problem structuring methods in action. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152(3), 530–554 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Montibeller, G., Belton, V.: Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options – a review. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 779–791 (2006)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsoukiàs, A.: On the concept of decision aiding process: an operational perspective. Ann. Oper. Res. 154(1), 3–27 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsoukiàs, A., Montibeller, G., Lucertini, G., Belton, V.: Policy analytics: an agenda for research and practice. EURO J. Decis. Process. 1, 115–134 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turnpenny, J., Radaelli, C.M., Jordan, A., Jacob, K.: The policy and politics of policy appraisal: emerging trends and new directions. J. Eur. Public Policy 16(4), 640–653 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Kildiene, S.: State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 20(1), 165–179 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Information and Communications SystemsMid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden

Personalised recommendations