Skip to main content

Toxic Skin and Animal Mops: Ticks and Humanimal Vulnerabilities

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW))

Abstract

This chapter draws attention to bodily boundaries between species of bacteria and the bodies of ticks, pets and humans, examining how ‘spot-on’ treatments for protection against ticks and fleas are used to protect human and companion animal bodies, relationships, and spaces from the threats of parasites. Such threats, it is argued, are controlled on the bodies of pets through the creation of ‘toxic skin’ that comes to serve as a protective boundary between human bodies and spaces and the threats of parasites. Suggesting that the parasitic relation can be used as an analytical tool for engaging with the politics of multispecies codependencies, the chapter addresses how parasitic relations challenge notions of human exceptionalism and the integrity of bodily boundaries. It demonstrates how spot-on treatments respond to such challenges by drawing lines through and around relations between human and non-human-animal bodies premised on the priority of particular bodily perspectives and ways of relating. The chapter concludes with the consideration that ticks, in spite of being an unwelcome parasite conceptualised and experienced as a threat, may be seen as the companion species par excellence as they bind together and are bound with a multitude of other species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.Frontline.com/ (USA) http://uk.Frontline.com/Pages/default.aspx (UK) http://Frontline.se.merial.com/html/play/index.asp (SWEDEN). The adverts described have or will probably be replaced. Unfortunately, due to copyright restrictions, the images cannot be reproduced here; however, screen grabs are available for illustrative purposes from the author.

  2. 2.

    http://www.who.int/immunization/topics/tick_encephalitis/en/, accessed 3/5/11.

  3. 3.

    Although I recognise that the term pet is a problematic term, it is used here to avoid confusion between companion animal and companion species, which is dealt with towards the end of the chapter.

  4. 4.

    Mutualism refers to two or more organisms in close association where both organisms benefit directly – a prime example is the union between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and root nodules in leguminous plants. Commensalism is used to refer to organisms in close association where one organism benefits with no direct cost to the other. The mutualism, commensalism, parasitism distinction becomes less significant when considered in relation to longer time frames, and given the more dynamic understandings of parasitism described in this chapter, this distinction becomes less significant.

  5. 5.

    http://Frontline.us.merial.com/prd.asp, accessed 11-11-11.

  6. 6.

    http://uk.Frontline.com/products/spot-on/Pages/How-FRONTLINE-Spot-On-Works.aspx, accessed 11-11-11.

  7. 7.

    9.9 % of reported cases in cats and 3.3 % in dogs with a total reported cases = 316.

  8. 8.

    4.5–9 kg.

  9. 9.

    This is not to attend to the transgressive and usually illegal acts of beastiality, but acknowledge the social-, economic-, personal- and care-filled intimacies of choosing to live with other species (see Rudy 2011 for a discussion of this point).

References

  • Armstrong, P. M., Brunet, L. R., Spielman, A., & Telford, S. R. (2001). Risk of Lyme disease: Perceptions of residents of a lone star tick-infested community. Bulletin of the world Health Organisation, 79, 916–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balogh, Z., Egyedb, L., Ferenczia, E., Bána, E., Szomora, K. N., Takácsa, M., & Berencsia, G. (2012). Experimental infection of goats with tick-borne encephalitis virus and the possibilities to prevent virus transmission by raw goat milk. Intervirology, 55, 194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barret, N. P., Schober-Bendixen, S., & Ehrlich, H. J. (2003). History of TBE vaccines. Vaccine, 21, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1989). The risk society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W. (1996). Metaphoric relationships with pets. Society and Animals, 4(2), 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caini, S., Szomor, K., Ferenczi, E., Székelyné Gáspár, Á., Csohán, Á., Krisztalovics, K., Molnár, Z., & Horváth, J. K. (2012). Tick-borne encephalitis transmitted by unpasteurised cow milk in western Hungary, September to October 2011. Euro Surveillance, 17, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (2005). Insecticide factsheet: Fipronil. Journal of Pesticide Reform, 25, 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drisdelle, R. (2010). Parasites: Tales of humanity’s most unwelcome guests. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, R., Orlingera, K. K., Hofmeistera, Y., Janeckia, K., Trawegera, A., Perez-Burgosa, L., Barretta, P. N., & Kreila, T. R. (2012). Quantitative comparison of the cross-protection induced by tick-borne encephalitis virus vaccines based on European and Far Eastern virus subtypes. Vaccine, 30, 1165–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garret, L. (1994). The coming plague: Newly emerging diseases in a world out of balance. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people and significant otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2012). Awash in urine: DES and Premarin® in multispecies response-ability. WSQ: Women’s Studies Quarterly, 40, 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatley, J. (2011). Blood intimacies and biodicy: Keeping faith with ticks. Australian Humanities Review, 50, 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernstein Smith, B. (2004). Animal relatives, difficult relations. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 13, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S., Allen, J., Lavau, S., Bingham, N., & Carter, S. (2012). Biosecurity and the topologies of infected life: From borderlines to borderlands. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00538.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzman, H., Aberle, S. W., Stiasny, K., Werner, P., Mischak, A., Zainer, B., Netzer, M., Koppi, S., Bechter, E., & Heinz, F. X. (2009). Tick-borne encephalitis from eating goat cheese in a mountain region of Austria. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 15, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, W. R. (2008). Factors that determine sperm precedence in ticks, spiders and insects: A comparative study. In A. S. Bowman & P. Nuttall (Eds.), Ticks: Biology, disease and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, C., & Heinz, F. X. (2003). Editorial tick-borne encephalitis. Vaccine, 21, S1–S2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1981) 1993. Symbiosis in cell evolution: Microbial communities in the archean and proterozoic eons. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, S. (2011). Animal stories: Narrating across species lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, H., Conrad, A., Barker, S., & Daugherty, C. (2007). Distribution and phylogenetic analyses of an endangered tick, Amblyomma spenodonti. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 34, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, M., & Dobler, G. (2011). Tick-borne encephalitis virus in dogs – Is this an issue? Parasites & Vectors, 4, 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzoli, A., Hauffe, H. C., Carpi, G., Vourc’h, G. I., Neteler, M., & Rosa, R. (2011). Lyme Borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveillance, 16(27), 19906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. S., & Janovy, J. (2009). Gerald D. Schmidt and Larry S. Roberts’ foundations of parasitology (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, K. (2011). Loving animals: Towards a new animal advocacy. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, J. (1994). Evolution by association: A history of symbiosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (2007). The parasite (trans: Scher, L. R.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. D., & Gerber, M. A. (2000). Lyme disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 31, 533–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steere, A. C. (1994). Lyme disease: A growing threat in urban populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 91, 2378–2383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theodossopoulos, D. (2005). Care, order and usefulness: The context of the human-animal relationship in a Greek island community. In J. Knight (Ed.), Animals in Person: Cultural perspectives on human-animal intimacies. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tingle, C. D., Rother, J. A., Dewhurst, C. F., Lauer, S., & King, W. J. (2000). Health and environmental effects of fipronil. London: Pesticide Action Network UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (1998). Memorandium: Fipronil – review of incident reports for three products; DP Barcodes: 241621, D241622, D241623 and D245344. USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2000). Memorandum: Fipronil – review of incident reports for three products: DP Barcodes: D261920, D261922 and D261923. USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2010a). Data evaluation record for enhanced spot-on reporting dog product reg no. 65331–3. USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2010b). Data evaluation record for enhanced spot-on reporting dog product reg no. 65331–5. USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (2010c). Memorandium: Review of enhanced reporting of 2008 spot-on incidents. USEPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon, J. (2000). Parasite-politics: On the significance of symbiosis and assemblage in theorising community formations. In C. Pierson & S. Tormey (Eds.), Politics at the edge. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, C. (2000). Parasite Rex: Inside the bizarre world of nature’s most dangerous creatures. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacob Bull .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bull, J. (2016). Toxic Skin and Animal Mops: Ticks and Humanimal Vulnerabilities. In: Käll, L. (eds) Bodies, Boundaries and Vulnerabilities. Crossroads of Knowledge. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22494-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22493-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22494-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics