Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering

  • Chapter

Abstract

Multidisciplinary Engineering will be a requirement for designers of modern systems in the near future. Much of the undergraduate Systems Engineering education is not effective in preparing engineers for the multidisciplinary approaches that will be required for system-of-systems integration and system optimization in the future. Commercial companies are becoming increasingly aware of the need for systems engineers, particularly systems engineers that understand a host of disciplines required to design, implement, and manage complex Information Technology systems. Engineering students must learn and adopt a breadth of disciplines to be ready for the systems engineering challenges of the future. Not only will Systems Engineering skills be required, but a host of other skills like Business Intelligence, Human Factors, Technology Integration, along with a working knowledge of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) skills. Systems Engineers can no longer become a stovepipe of systems engineering knowledge, and assume someone else will handle making sure their designs conform to the needs of other disciplines. Figure 2.1 below illustrates the confluence of these skills into the field of Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering [25].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Metadata is information used to identify and manage data/information. Metadata is used to organize data/information and resources across the system.

  2. 2.

    Depicts a representation of processing environment from the University of Alabama, Birmingham Hartman Genetics Lab (circa 2007).

References

  1. Camarinha-Matos, L. and Afsarmanesh, H. 2008. Collaborative Networks: Reference Modeling. Springer Publishing, New York NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Egyed, A., Grunbacher, P., and Medvidovic, N. 2001. Refinement and Evolution Issues in Bridging Requirements and Architecture-the CBSP Approach. In International Software Requirements to Architecture Workshop, Toronto, CAN.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bahrami, A. 1999. Object-Oriented Systems Development: Using the Unified Modeling Language. McGraw Hill, New York, NY, ISBN 0-07-234966-2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Crowder, J. and Carbone, J. 2012. Reasoning Frameworks for Autonomous Systems. Proceedings of the AIAA Infotech@Aerospace 2012 Conference, Garden Grove, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, B. and Atlee, J. 2009. Current and Future Research Directions in Requirements Engineering. In Design Requirements Engineering: A Ten-Year Perspective Workshop, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tolk, A. and Lakhmi, J. (Eds.). 2011. Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering. Springer Publishing, New York, NY. ISBN 978-3-642-17930-3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manthorpe, W. 1996. The Emerging Joint System-of-Systems: A Systems Engineering Challenge and Opportunity for APL. Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ertas, A. and Tanik, M. 2000. Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Research Model. Transactions of the SDPS, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 1-11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morris, P., Hough, G., and Morris, W. 1987. The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feathers, M. 2004. Working Effectively with Legacy Code, Prentice Hall, New York, NY.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Yaneer, B. 2004. The Characteristics and Emerging Behaviors of System-of-Systems. In: NECSI: Complex Physical, Biological and Social Systems Project.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Medvidovic, N., Grunbacher, P., Egyed, A., and Boehm, B. 2003. Bridging Models across the Software Lifecycle. Journal on Systems and Software, 68:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mittal, S. and Martin, J. 2013. Netcentric System of Systems Engineering with DEVS Unified Process. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Curry, E. 2012. System of Systems Information Interoperability Using a Linked Dataspace. In IEEE 7th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE 2012), 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lucena, J. 2013. Engineering Education for Social Justice. Springer Publishing, New York, NY, ISBN 978-94-007-6350-0.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. McHugh, O. Conboy, K., and Lang, M. 2012. Agile Practices: The Impact on Trust in Software Project Teams. IEEE Software May/June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford, B., Leon de la Barra, C., Soto, R., and Monfroy, E. 2012. Agile Software Engineering as Creative Work. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Co-operative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering, ICSE, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Azim, S., Gale, A., Lawlor-Wright, T., Kirkham, R., Khan, A., and Mehmood, A. 2010. The Importance of Soft Skills in Complex Projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3, 387-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meier, B., Wilkowski, B., and Robinson, M. 2007. Bringing out the Agreeableness in Everyone: Using a Cognitive Self-Regulation Model to Reduce Aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2008), 1383-1387.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wingreen, N. and Botstein, D. 2006. Back to the Future: Education for Systems-Level Biologists. Nature Reviews Molecular Biology, 7, 829-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antonsson, E. 1987. Development and Testing of Hypotheses in Engineering Design Research. ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design. Vol. 109(2), 153-154.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Medvidovic, N. and Taylor, R. 2000. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26.1: 70-93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schenk, T. 2005. Introduction to Photogrammetry. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hartman, J. 2006. A Systems Approach to Understanding Gene Interaction Networks using the Yeast Model System. SDPS Systems Biology Workshop, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Landis, R., Carbone, J, and Tosetta, C. 2007. Transdisciplinary Approaches to Systems Biology. Curriculum for Texas Tech ME6331, Systems Biology for Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Willson, R. 1994. Modeling and Calibration of Automated Zoom Lenses. In SPIE 2350:Videometrics III, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shan, T. and Hua, W. 2006. Solution Architecting Mechanism. Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International EDOC Enterprise Computing Conference (EDOC 200), pp. 23-32.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Ostermann, and Zhang. 2001. Video Processing and Communications. Prentice Hall Publishing, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Willson, R. and Schafer, S. 1993. A Perspective Projection Camera Model for Zoom Lenses. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Optical 3-D Measurement Techniques, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kjokic, S. 2003. The Moving Optical Center in Lighting Calculations. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, Vol. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weghorst, H., Hooper, G., and Greenberg, D. 1984. Improved Computational Methods for Ray Tracing. ACM Transaction of Graphics, Vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Curcin, V., Ghanem, M., Guo, Y., and Rowe, A. 2004. IT Service Infrastructure for Integrative Systems Biology. In IEEE International Conference on Services Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fiadeiro, J., Lopes, A., and Bocchi, L. 2006. A Formal Approach to Service Component Architecture. Web Services and Formal Methods, 4148:193-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng, J., Scharenbroich, L., Baldi, P., and Mjolsness, E. 2005. Sigmoid: A Software Infrastructure for Pathway Bioinformatics and Systems Biology. IEEE Intelligent Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shah, N., Laws, J., Wardman, B., Zhao, P., and Hartman, L. 2007. Accurate, Precise Modeling of Cell Proliferation Kinetics from Time-Lapse Imaging and Automated Image Analysis of Agar Yeast Culture Arrays. BMC Systems Biology, Vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crowder, J.A., Carbone, J.N., Demijohn, R. (2016). Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering. In: Multidisciplinary Systems Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22398-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22398-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22397-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22398-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics