Advertisement

Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector a Case of the Brazilian Federal Government

  • Herman Resende SantosEmail author
  • Kawaljeet Kapoor
  • Dany Flávio Tonelli
  • Vishanth Weerakkody
  • Dalton Sousa
  • Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 9265)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to verify the statistical validity of a collaborative public sector innovation model in the Brazilian Federal Government context. This model essentially addresses aspects of co-creation, public sector innovation, and innovation ecosystem. Structural Equation Modeling results show a good model fit. It is concluded that the creative collaborative processes (co-creation) may generate new public values and foster public sector innovation. This stimulates the development of an innovation ecosystem supported by new public values and co-creative dynamics.

Keywords

Co-creation Innovation ecosystem Public sector innovation Public value Public governance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

to Minas Gerais State Foundation for Research Development (FAPEMIG) – Brazil.

References

  1. 1.
    Szkuta, K., Pizzicannella, R., Osimo, D.: Collaborative approaches to public sector innovation: a scoping study. Telecommunications Policy (2014). ISSN 0308-5961Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggers, W.D.: Government 2.0: using technology to improve education, cut red tape, reduce gridlock, and enhance democracy. Rowman & Littlefield (2007). ISBN 0742541762Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huijboom, N., et al.: Public Services 2.0: the impact of social computing on public services. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is web 2.0. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2009). ISBN 1449391079Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Noveck, B.S.S.: Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press (2009). ISBN 0815703465Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldsmith, S., Eggers, W.D.: Governing by network: the new shape of the public sector. Brookings Institution Press (2004). ISBN 0815797524Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janowski, T., Pardo, T.A., Davies, J.: Government information networks-mapping electronic governance cases through public administration concepts. Gov. Inf. Q. 29, S1–S10 (2012). ISSN 0740-624XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gil-Garcia, J.R., Helbig, N., Ojo, A.: Being smart: emerging technologies and innovation in the public sector. Gov. Inf. Q. 31, I1–I8 (2014). ISSN 0740-624XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Europeann Commission, E. Powering European Public Sector Innovation: Towards A New Architecture (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Theories of democratic network governance. Palgrave Macmillan (2007). ISBN 1403995281Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chathoth, P., et al.: Co-production versus co-creation: a process based continuum in the hotel service context. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 32, 11–20 (2013). ISSN 0278-4319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castells, M., Majer, R.V., Gerhardt, K.B.: A sociedade em rede. Paz e Terra, São Paulo (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    White House. Presidential Innovation Fellows. http://www.whitehouse.gov/innovationfellows/
  14. 14.
    Nambisan, S., Nambisan, P.: IBM. Engaging Citizens in Co-Creation in Public Services (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, J.-S., Tsou, H.-T., Ching, R.K.: Co-production and its effects on service innovation. Ind. Mark. Manag. 40(8), 1331–1346 (2011). ISSN 0019-8501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kambil, A., Ginsberg, A., Bloch, M.: Re-inventing value propositions. Information Systems Working Papers Series (1996)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chesbrough, H.W.: Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, (2003). ISBN 1578518377Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation: the evolving phenomenon of user innovation. J. für Betriebswirtschaft 55(1), 63–78 (2005). ISSN 0344-9327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jenkins, H.: Convergence culture: where new and old media collide. New York University Press, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(1), 79–90 (2000). ISSN 0017-8012Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lusch, R.F., et al.: The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate, and Directions. ME Sharpe, Armonk (2006). ISBN 0765614901Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Von Hippel, E.: Horizontal innovation networks—by and for users. Ind. Corporate Change 16(2), 293–315 (2007). ISSN 0960-6491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zwass, V.: Co-creation: Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 15(1), 11–48 (2010). ISSN 1086-4415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J. Interact. Marketing 18(3), 5–14 (2004). ISSN 1520-6653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Santos, H.R., Tonelli, D.F., Bermejo, P.H.: Sociopolitical digital interactions’ maturity: analyzing the brazilian states. Int. J. Electr. Gov. Res. (IJEGR) 10(4), 76–93 (2014). doi: 10.4018/ijegr.2014100104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: The co-creation connection. Strategy and Business, pp. 50–61 (2002). ISSN 1083-706XGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Theunissen, P.: Co-creating corporate identity through dialogue: a pilot study. Public Relations Review (2014). ISSN 0363-8111Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bason, C.: Leading public sector innovation: co-creating for a better society. Policy Press (2010). ISBN 1847426336Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramaswamy, V., Gouillart, F.J.: The power of co-creation: build it with them to boost growth, productivity, and profits. Simon and Schuster (2010). ISBN 1439181063Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roessner, J.D.: Incentives to innovate in public and private organizations. Adm. Soc. 9(3), 341–365 (1977). ISSN 0095-3997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Windrum, P.: Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. In: Windrum, P., Koch, P. (eds.) Innovation in Public Sector Services: Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management, pp. 3–22. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sørensen, E., Torfing, J.: Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, p. 0095399711418768 (2011). ISSN 0095-3997Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mulgan, G.: Ready or Not?: Taking Innovation in the Public Sector Seriously. Nesta (2007). ISBN 184875017XGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Koch, P., Hauknes, J.: On Innovation in the Public Sector. Citeseer (2005)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bozeman, B.: Public Values Concepts and Criteria: The Case for “Progressive Opportunity” as a Criterion. Creating Public Value in a Multi-Sector, Shared-Power World, Minneapolis (2012)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moore, M.H., Benington, J.: Conclusions: looking ahead. In: Benington, J., Moore, M.H. (eds.) Public Value: Theory and Practice, pp. 256–274. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Service-dominant logic: What It Is, What It Is Not, What It Might Be, The Service-Dominant Logic of Marketing: Dialog, Debate and Directions, pp. 43–56. M.E. Sharpe Inc., Armonk (2006)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gault, F.: User innovation and the market. Science and Public Policy 39(1), 118–128 (2012). ISSN 0302-3427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mercan, B., Göktaş, D.: Components of innovation ecosystems: a cross-country study. Int. Res. J. Finan. Econ. Iss. 76, 102–112 (2011)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Estrin, J.: Closing the Innovation Gap: Reigniting the Spark of Creativity in a Global Economy. McGrew Hill, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deeds, D.L., Rothaermel, F.T.: Honeymoons and liabilities: the relationship between age and performance in research and development alliances. J. Prod. Innov. Manage. 20(6), 468–485 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dodgson, M.: Technological Collaboration in Industry: Strategy, Policy, and Internationalization in Innovation. Routledge, London (1993)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Faems, D., Van Looy, B., Debackere, K.: Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: toward a portfolio approach. J. Prod. Innov. Manage 22(3), 238–250 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hagedoorn, J.: Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Res. Policy 31(4), 477–492 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schilling, M.A., Phelps, C.C.: Interfirm collaboration networks: the impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Manage. Sci. 53(7), 1113–1126 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Debata, B.R., et al.: Interrelations of service quality and service loyalty dimensions in medical tourism: a structural equation modelling approach. Benchmarking Int. J. 22(1) (2015). ISSN 1463-5771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Spearman, C.: General intelligence, objectively determined and measured. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 201–293 (1904)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wright, S.: Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 20, 557–585 (1921)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Carlile, P.R., Christensen, C.M.: The cycles of theory building in management research (2004)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., Black, W.: Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1995)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Análise multivariada de dados, 5th edn. Bookman, Porto Alegre (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herman Resende Santos
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kawaljeet Kapoor
    • 2
  • Dany Flávio Tonelli
    • 1
  • Vishanth Weerakkody
    • 2
  • Dalton Sousa
    • 3
  • Paulo Henrique de Souza Bermejo
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal de LavrasLavrasBrasil
  2. 2.Brunel University LondonUxbridgeUK
  3. 3.Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do SulCampo GrandeBrasil

Personalised recommendations