The Role of Fairness in Governing Supply Chain Collaborations—A Case-Study in the Dutch Floriculture Industry

  • G. Robbert Janssen
  • Ard-Pieter de Man
  • Hans J. Quak
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

Supply chain collaboration, in which two or more autonomous firms work together to plan and execute supply chain operations, is becoming ever more important to remain competitive in business. Yet, through collaboration concerns arise about whether the benefits and risks of collaboration are split in an acceptable and fair manner. This research illustrates the role of fairness (organizational justice theory) in creating and appropriating value from supply chain collaborations. We therefore analyze an extensive case study in the Dutch floricultural industry, in which six companies enter a supply chain collaboration. We conclude that fairness considerations are very important for explaining the outcomes of supply chain collaborations. Asymmetries in perceived value appropriation can be offset if the collaboration is deemed fair on distributive, procedural, interpersonal and informational justice dimensions. Firms may improve the success rate of supply chain collaborations if the fairness perceived is considered to be adequate.

Keywords

Supply chain collaboration Organizational justice theory Value appropriation Case study 

References

  1. Adams J (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–299Google Scholar
  2. Akkermans H, Bogerd P, van Doremalen J (2004) Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics. Eur J Oper Res 153(2):445–456. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00164-4
  3. Ariño A, Ring PS (2010) The role of fairness in alliance formation. Strateg Manag J 31:1054–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao M, Zhang Q (2011) Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. J Oper Manag 29:163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colquitt JA (2001) On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J Appl Psychol 86:386–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cruijssen F, Bräysy O, Dullaert W (2007) Joint route planning under varying market conditions. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37:287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cruijssen F, Borm P, Fleuren H, Hamers H (2010) Supplier-initiated outsourcing: a methodology to exploit synergy in transportation. Eur J Oper Res 207:763–774CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. De Man A-P (2005) Alliance capability: a comparison of the alliance strength of European and american companies. Eur Manag J 23:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dinalog.nl (2014) 4C: cross chain control centers. http://www.dinalog.nl/en/themes/4c__cross_chain_control_center/
  10. Dyer JH, Singh H, Kale P (2008) Splitting the pie: rent distribution in alliances and networks. Manag Decis Econ 29:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frisk M, Göthe-Lundgren M, Jörnsten K, Rönnqvist M (2010) Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. Eur J Oper Res 205:448–458CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg J (1987) A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad Manag Rev 12:9–22Google Scholar
  13. Griffith D, Harvey M, Lusch RF (2006) Social exchange in supply chain relationships: the resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice. J Oper Manag 24:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Homans GC (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol 63:597–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jap SD (2001) “Pie sharing” in complex collaboration contexts. J Mark Res 38:86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jap SD, Anderson E (2007) Testing a life-cycle theory of cooperative interorganizational relationships: Movement across stages and performance. Manage Sci 53:260–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kale P, Singh H (2009) Managing strategic alliances: what do we know now, and where do we go from here? Acad Manag Perspect 23:45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein Woolthuis R, Nooteboom B, de Jong G (2014) Roles of third parties in trust repair: an empirical test in high tech industries. In: Wick A, Harris J, Moriarty B (eds) Public trust in business. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp 290–325 Google Scholar
  19. Lavie D (2007) Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strateg Manag J 28:1187–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Huang Y, Luo Y, Zhao Y (2012) How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance? J Oper Manag 30:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo Y (2005) How important are shared perceptions of procedural justice in cooperative alliances? Acad Manag J 48:695–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo Y (2007) The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Acad Manag J 50:644–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luo Y (2008) Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strateg Manag J 29:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luo Y (2009) From gain-sharing to gain-generation: the quest for distributive justice in international joint ventures. J Int Manag 15:343–356Google Scholar
  25. MARVEL (2014) Principles of a method for semi-qualitative system behaviour and policy analysis. In: Proceedings of the international conference on system dynamics. System Dynamics Society, pp 1–21Google Scholar
  26. Min S, Roath AS, Daugherty PJ (2005) Supply chain collaboration: what’s happening? Int J Logist Manag 16:237–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyaga GN, Whipple JM, Lynch DF (2010) Examining supply chain relationships: do buyer and supplier perspectives on collaborative relationships differ? J Oper Manag 28:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation, pp 1–288Google Scholar
  29. Quak H, De Koster R (2007) Exploring retailers’ sensitivity to local sustainability policies. J Oper Manag 25:1103–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rijkswaterstaat.nl (2014) Impuls Dynamisch Verkeersmanagement Vaarwegen. http://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/zakelijk/verkeersmanagement/idvv/
  31. Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2002) The collaborative supply chain. Int J Logist Manag 13:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tjemkes B (2008) Growing and sharing the pie a study of performance in strategic alliances, pp 1–295Google Scholar
  33. Tjemkes B, Vos P, Burgers K (2012) Strategic alliance management, p 368Google Scholar
  34. Voss C, Tsikriktsis N, Frohlich MT (2002) Case research in operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22:195–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weissink A (2013) Terminals Rotterdam: vechten om vracht, en toch samenwerking. Financ Dagbl 2Google Scholar
  36. Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. pp 1–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Robbert Janssen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ard-Pieter de Man
    • 2
  • Hans J. Quak
    • 1
  1. 1.TNO Mobility and LogisticsDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations