Reducing the Environmental Impact of Urban Parcel Distribution

  • Theodoros Athanassopoulos
  • Kerstin Dobers
  • Uwe Clausen
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

In the framework of rising requirements concerning the environmental impact of urban parcel delivery, UPS has tested various approaches to reduce emissions with steady or even enhanced operational efficiency. Three different alternatives to classic diesel drive technology were tested in the city of Hamburg, i.e. parcel vehicles with electric drive, and e-assisted cargo tricycles either solely or in combination with a parcel storage container. The corresponding costs, greenhouse gas, SO2, NOx, CO and particulate matter emissions have been assessed and discussed. The analyses show that none of the isolated pilot tests result in overall reduced costs and emissions; however they need to be evaluated thoroughly. Clear advantages of the alternatives are outlined and their embedding in the overall UPS urban network in combination with an increased purchase of renewable energy promise a future reduction of costs and the environmental impact of UPS’ urban parcel distribution.

Keywords

Carbon footprint Distribution Emission Green Logistics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The detailed examinations have been performed in the frame of the research project “Green Logistics” (Green Logistics 2015) and its case study “ecoPlan”. The project is part of the LogistikRuhr efficiency cluster (EffizienzCluster LogistikRuhr 2015), which is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Funding code 01IC10L06).

References

  1. Althaus et al (2009a) Traffic noise in LCA. Part 1: State-of-science and requirement profile for consistent context-sensitive integration of traffic noise in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Althaus et al (2009b) Traffic noise in LCA. Part 2: Analysis of existing methods and proposition of a new framework for consistent, context-sensitive LCI modeling of road transport noise emission. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:676–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold et al (2008) Handbuch Logistik, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BIEK Bundesverband Internationaler Express- und Kurierdienste e.V. (2014) Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der KEP-Branche. Die Kurier-, Express- und Paketbranche in Deutschland. KEP-Studie 2014 - Marktanalyse. http://www.biek.de/index.php/studien.html [03/15/2015]
  5. DIN EN 16258 (2013) Methode zur Berechnung und Deklaration des Energieverbrauchs und der Treibhausgasemissionen bei Transportdienstleistungen (Güter- und Personenverkehr)Google Scholar
  6. DIN ISO 14040 (2006) Umweltmanagement - Ökobilanz - Grundsätze und RahmenbedingungenGoogle Scholar
  7. DIN ISO 14044 (2006) Umweltmanagement - Ökobilanz - Anforderungen und AnleitungenGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobers et al (2012a) Ökologische Bewertung von Logistikprozessen und -systemen: Systemdefinition Green Logistics (Langdokumentation). http://www.green-logistics-network.de/images/stories/Download/systemdefinition_green_gogistics_v3_5.pdf [03/15/2015]
  9. Dobers et al (2012b) Ecological assessment of logistics processes and systems: System definition Green Logistics (brief documentation). http://www.green-logistics-network.de/images/stories/Download/systemdefinition_summary_en.pdf [03/15/2015]
  10. Dobers et al (2014) Comparability of the Environmental Effects of Logistics Services. Sector Guidance for Ecological Assessment. TRA 2014 Proceedings. Paris, 14.-17.4.2014Google Scholar
  11. Doelling (2013) Neue Containerlösung soll innerstädtischen Lieferverkehr und Emissionen reduzieren. http://www.energie-experten.org/experte/meldung-anzeigen/news/neue-containerloesung-soll-innerstaedtischen-lieferverkehr-und-emissionen-reduzieren-4150.html [03/15/2015]
  12. EEA European Environment Agency (2011) Laying the foundations for greener transport. TERM 2011: transport indicators tracking progress towards environmental targets in Europe. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  13. ecoinvent (2013) v3.01 Master Data. http://www.ecoinvent.org [09/19/2014]
  14. EFA-S (2015) EFA-S Elektrofahrzeuge Schwaben GmbH. http://www.efa-s.de/ [03/15/2015]
  15. Effizienzcluster LogistikRuhr (2015) http://www.effizienzcluster.de/ [03/15/2015]
  16. EIA (2015) U.S. Energy Information Administration. International Energy Statistics. http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=2&pid=alltypes&aid=12&cid=r3,&syid=2010&eyid=2012&unit=BKWH [03/15/2015]
  17. ELMO (2014) http://www.projekt-elmo.de [03/15/2015]
  18. Europäische Kommission (2011) Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. White Paper. COM(2011) 144 finalGoogle Scholar
  19. GLEC Global Logistics Emission Council (2015). http://www.theglec.org/ [03/15/2015]
  20. Green Logistics (2015) http://www.green-logistics-network.de/ [03/15/2015]
  21. INFRAS (2010) Handbuch Emissionsfaktoren des Straßenverkehrs (HBEFA). Version 3.1. Bern. http://www.hbefa.net [03/15/2015]
  22. ISO 14064-1 (2006) Greenhouse gases - Part 1 - Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removalsGoogle Scholar
  23. ISO 14064-2 (2006) Greenhouse gases - Part 2 - Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification, monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal enhancementsGoogle Scholar
  24. ISO 14064-3 (2006) Greenhouse gases - Part 3 - Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of greenhouse gas assertionsGoogle Scholar
  25. ISO 14065 (2007) Greenhouse gases - Requirements for greenhouse gas validation and verification bodies for use in accreditation or other forms of recognitionGoogle Scholar
  26. IWA International Workshop Agreement 16 (2015) International harmonized method(s) for a coherent quantification of CO2e emissions of freight transportGoogle Scholar
  27. Kopp (2015) Paketdienst UPS testet die Paketzustellung zu Fuß. Neue City-Logistik. http://www.abendblatt.de/hamburg/article136896611/Paketdienst-UPS-testet-die-Paketzustellung-zu-Fuss.html# [03/15/2015]
  28. Rüdiger and Clausen (Ed.) (2014). Studie zu alternativen Antriebsformen im Straßengüterverkehr. Status Quo und Entwicklungsperspektiven - 2014. Stuttgart: Fraunhofer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  29. Umweltbundesamt (2015) Feinstaub. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/themen/luft/luftschadstoffe/feinstaub [03/15/2015]
  30. UPS (2013) UPS Corporate Sustainability Report 2013. http://sustainability.ups.com/media/UPS-2013-Corporate-Sustainability-Report.pdf [03/15/2015]
  31. WRI and WBCSD (2005) The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The GHG Protocol for Project Accounting. USA, Switzerland. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/ghg_project_protocol.pdf [03/15/2015]
  32. WRI and WBCSD (2011a) The Greenhouse gas protocol. Product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. USA, Switzerland. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/Product-Life-Cycle-Accounting-Reporting-Standard_041613.pdf [03/15/2015]
  33. WRI and WBCSD (2011b) The Greenhouse gas protocol. Corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting and reporting standard. USA, Switzerland. http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/Corporate-Value-Chain-Accounting-Reporing-Standard_041613.pdf [03/15/2015]
  34. 10. BImSchV (2010) ZehnteVerordnung zur Durchführung des Bundes-Immissions-schutzgesetzes: Verordnung über die Beschaffenheit und die Auszeichnung der Qualitäten von Kraft- und Brennstoffen. http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bundesrecht/bimschv_10_2010/gesamt.pdf [03/15/2015]

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodoros Athanassopoulos
    • 1
  • Kerstin Dobers
    • 2
  • Uwe Clausen
    • 2
  1. 1.United Parcel Service Deutschland Inc. & Co OHGFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and LogisticsDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations