Advertisement

War Rhetoric and Disaster Transparency

  • Lisa Grow SunEmail author
  • RonNell Andersen Jones
Part of the Risk, Governance and Society book series (RISKGOSO, volume 19)

Abstract

In recent years, war and national security rhetoric has come to permeate the legal and policy conversations on a wide variety of natural and technological disasters. This melding of disaster and war to justify exceptions to ordinary constitutional and democratic norms is particularly apparent in governmental restrictions on the flow of its communications in disasters, as limitations on information flow that might be warranted when there are thinking enemies (such as in times of war) are invoked in disaster scenarios lacking such thinking enemies. The extension of wartime transparency exceptionalism into nonthinking-enemy disasters—reflected in both legislation and official rhetoric—is deeply troubling: it risks the illegitimate construction of enemies by government and the unwarranted transformation of public spaces into war zones from which the public can be more easily excluded. Only by consciously disaggregating dissimilar forms of emergencies and removing the rhetoric of war from disaster decision-making can the government make appropriate determinations about the provision of information in times of community or national crisis.

Keywords

Disaster Response Evacuation Order Government Information Disaster Scenario Technological Disaster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. (1931) Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson. United States Reports 283: 697–737Google Scholar
  2. (1980) Halperin v. CIA, Federal Reporter (2d) 629: 144–162Google Scholar
  3. (1980) Snepp v. United States. United States Reports 444: 507–526Google Scholar
  4. (2005) Bush pushes for military to quarantine avian flu breakout. In: FoxNews.com. Available via http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171230,00.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  5. (2005) Troops told “Shoot to Kill” in New Orleans, 2 Sept 2005. In: ABC News Online. Available via http://www.abc.net.au/news/2005-09-02/troops-told-shoot-to-kill-in-new-orleans/2094678. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  6. 42 U.S.C. §§ 5170, 5170a (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(A), (E)–(F)Google Scholar
  8. 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)(A)–(B) (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Ackerman B (2004) This is not war. Yale Law J 113:1871–1907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ackerman B (2006) Before the next attack: preserving civil liberties in an age of terrorism. Yale University Press, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  11. Annas G (2010) Worst case bioethics: death, disaster, and public health. Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barry J (2004) The great influenza: the epic story of the deadliest plague in history. Viking, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Barry E et al (2005) New Orleans slides into chaos. The Los Angeles Times, 2 Sept 2005, A1Google Scholar
  14. Brandeis L (1914) Other people’s money and how the bankers use it. F. A. Stokes, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Bratspies R (2009) Regulatory trust. Arizona Law Rev 51:575–631Google Scholar
  16. Carter B, Barringer F (2001) In patriotic time, dissent is muted: debate grows over balancing security and free speech. N Y Times, 28 Sept 2001, A1Google Scholar
  17. Cecchine G, Moore M (2006) Infectious disease and national security: strategic information needs. National Defense Research Institute, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2002) Crisis and emergency risk communicationGoogle Scholar
  19. Clark L, Chess C (2008) Elites and panic: more to fear than fear itself. Soc Forces 87:993–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emerson T (1976) Legal foundations of the right to know. Wash Univ Law Q 1976:1–24Google Scholar
  21. Farber D et al (2010) Disaster law and policy, 2nd edn. Aspen, Frederick, MDCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fenster M (2006) The opacity of transparency. Iowa Law Rev 91:885–949Google Scholar
  23. Fischer H III (2008) Response to disaster: fact versus fiction and its perpetuation: the sociology of disaster, 3rd edn. University Press of America, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuchs M (2006) Judging secrets: the role courts should play in preventing unnecessary secrecy. Adm Law Rev 58:131–176Google Scholar
  25. Gerwin L (2011) Planning for pandemic: a new model for governing public health emergencies. Am J Law Med 38:128–157Google Scholar
  26. Gowder P (2006) Secrecy as mystification of power: meaning and ethics in the security state. I/S J Law Policy 2:1–25Google Scholar
  27. Gross O (2003) Chaos and rules: should responses to violent crises always be constitutional? Yale Law J 112:1011–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hommerich C (2012) Trust and subjective well-being after the Great East Japan earthquake, tsunami and nuclear meltdown: preliminary results. Int J Jpn Sociol 21:46–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingalsbee T (2006) The war on wildfire: firefighting and the militarization of forest fire management. In: Wuerthner G (ed) The wildfire reader: a century of failed forest policy. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 262–285Google Scholar
  30. Ingalsbee T (2013) The war on wildfire: firefighting and the militarization of the forestry. In: Fire-Ecology.org, 11 March 2013. Available via http://www.fire-ecology.org/research/war_on_wildfire.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  31. Kitrosser H (2010) Symposium: it came from beneath the twilight zone: wiretapping and article II imperialism. Texas Law Rev 88:1401–1434Google Scholar
  32. Kurtz H (2005) Standing in the way of a good story. In: The Washington Post, 9 Sept 2005. Available via http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/08/AR2005090802121.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  33. Lasker R, New York Academy of Medicine (2004) Redefining readiness: terrorism planning through the eyes of the public. http://www.vchca.org/docs/public-health/terrorism_planning_eyes_of_public.pdf?sfvrsn=0
  34. Lauta K (2012) Exceptions and norms: the law of natural disasters. DissertationGoogle Scholar
  35. Mongoven A (2006) The war on disease and the war on terror: a dangerous metaphorical nexus. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 15:403–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nat’l Press Photographers Association (2010) Coast guard lifts boom ban; announces New Media Procedures, 13 July 2010. Available via https://nppa.org/news/875. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  37. National Research Council (2012) Dam and Levee safety and community resilience: a vision for future practice. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Obama B (2010a) Remarks honoring the 2010 Super Bowl Champion New Orleans Saints, 9 Aug 2010Google Scholar
  39. Obama B (2010b) Address to the nation on the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, 15 June 2010Google Scholar
  40. Obama B (2010c) Remarks at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Pensacola, Florida, 15 June 2010Google Scholar
  41. Onishi N, Fackler M (2011) Japan held nuclear data, leaving evacuees in Peril. N Y Times, 9 Aug 2011, A1Google Scholar
  42. Osnos E (2011) The fallout. In: New Yorker, 17 Oct 2011. Available via http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/10/17/the-fallout. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  43. Peled R, Rabin Y (2011) The constitutional right to information. Columbia Hum Rights Law Rev 42:357–401Google Scholar
  44. Peters J (2010) Efforts to limit the flow of spill news. N Y Times, 30 June 2010, A20Google Scholar
  45. Picou J et al (2004) Disaster, litigation, and the corrosive community. Soc Forces 82:1493–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Podesta J (2003) Need to know: governing in secret. In: Leone R, Anrig G (eds) The war on our freedoms: civil liberties in an age of terrorism. Public Affairs, New York, pp 220–237Google Scholar
  47. Posner R (2006) Not a suicide pact: the constitution in a time of national emergency. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Posner E, Vermuele A (2005) Accomodating emergencies. In: Tushnet M (ed) The constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp 55–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Posner E, Vermuele A (2010) The executive unbound: after the Madisonian Republic. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Pozen D (2010) Deep secrecy. Stanford Law Rev 62:257–340Google Scholar
  51. Quarantelli E (2001) Panic, sociology of. In: Smelser N, Baltes P (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Pergamon, New York, pp 11010–11023Google Scholar
  52. Quarantelli E, Dynes R (1972) When disaster strikes (it isn’t much like what you’ve heard and read about). Psychol Today 5:66–70Google Scholar
  53. S. REP. NO. 109-322, at 515 (2006)Google Scholar
  54. Safina C (2011) A sea in flames: the deepwater horizon oil blowout. Crown, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Samaha A (2006) Government secrets, constitutional law, and platforms for judicial intervention. UCLA Law Rev 53:909–976Google Scholar
  56. Scanlon J (2007) Unwelcome irritant or useful ally? The mass media in emergencies. In: Rodríguez H et al (eds) Handbook of disaster research. Springer, New York, pp 413–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schmitt C (1932) The concept of the political (trans: George Schwab). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  58. Sontag S (2002) Real battles and empty metaphors. N Y Times, 10 Sept 2002, A25Google Scholar
  59. Sorensen J, Mileti D (1987) Decision-making uncertainties in emergency warning system organizations. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 5:33–61Google Scholar
  60. Stone G (2004) Perilous times: free speech in wartime. W. W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Sun L (2011) Disaster mythology and the law. Cornell Law Rev 96:1131–1208Google Scholar
  62. Sun L, Jones R (2013) Disaggregating disasters. UCLA Law Rev 60:884–948Google Scholar
  63. The Working Group on “Governance Dilemmas” in Bioterrorism Response (2004) Leading during bioattacks and epidemics with the public’s trust and help. Biosecur Bioterror 2:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tierney K, Bevc C (2007) Disaster as war: militarism and the social construction of disaster in New Orleans. In: Brunsma D et al (eds) The sociology of Katrina: perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD, pp 35–51Google Scholar
  65. Tierney K et al (2006) Metaphors matter: disaster myths, media frames, and their consequences in Hurricane Katrina. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604:57–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tushnet M (2005) Emergencies and the idea of constitutionalism. In: Tushnet M (ed) The constitution in wartime: beyond alarmism and complacency. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, pp 39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tyson A (2005) Troops back from Iraq find another war zone; In New Orleans, “It’s Like Baghdad on a Bad Day.” The Washington Post, 6 Sept 2005, A10Google Scholar
  68. U.S. Government (2010) Coast guard establishes 20-meter safety zone around all deepwater horizon protective boom; operations, 10 June 2010. Available via http://www.restorethegulf.gov/release/2010/06/30/coast-guard-establishes-20-meter-safety-zone-around-all-deepwater-horizon-protect. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  69. Williams B (2005) Daily nightly: predicting disaster. In: MSNBC.Com, 7 Sept 2005, 4:30 PM. Available via http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9216831. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  70. Yassin J (2005) Demonizing the victims of Katrina. In: Extra, November-December. Available via http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=2793. Accessed 26 Aug 2014
  71. Zolla W II (2003) The war at home: rising tensions between our civil liberties and our national security. CBA Rec 17(2003):32Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law SchoolBrigham Young UniversityProvoUSA

Personalised recommendations