Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evolutionary Aspects of the Use of Predator Odors in Antipredator Behaviors of Lumholtz’s Tree-Kangaroos (Dendrolagus lumholtzi)

  • Conference paper
Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 13

Abstract

In multi-predator systems with different predator ‘archetypes’, prey have an advantage when applying ‘archetype’-specific responses. However, antipredator responses can be lost or modified during times of ‘relaxed predation selection’. As a consequence, prey may become vulnerable when novel predators are introduced into their environments. This study investigates whether the Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo (LTK) (Dendrolagus lumholtzi), an arboreal folivore marsupial of rainforests in North Queensland, Australia, (1) recognizes odor cues from arboreal and terrestrial predators, (2) exhibits archetype-specific antipredator responses to them, and (3) is able to transmit archetype-specific antipredator responses to novel predators of similar archetype. Five captive LTKs were exposed to lavender oil as neutral odor, fecal material from an extant arboreal predator, the amethystine python (Morelia amethystine), from two novel terrestrial predators, the domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) and the dingo (Canis lupus dingo), and a control odor (water). All subjects showed an increase in durations and frequencies of vigilance, and a decrease in the duration of comfort behaviors when exposed to the fecal material compared to the control odor, but not when the neutral odor was presented. This suggests that the presented fecal material is associated with predatory threats. Subjects increased duration and frequency of their movements in trials with fecal material from a python and a dingo, but not in trials with fecal material from a dog or the neutral odor which indicates that tree-kangaroos do not respond differently to arboreal and terrestrial predators. This conclusion is discussed with respect to the relatively recent descent of tree-kangaroos from rock-wallabies at a time when its ancient terrestrial predators became extinct, and with respect to reported fatalities of tree-kangaroos when encountering domestic dogs or dingoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anson J, Dickman C (2013) Behavioral responses of native prey to disparate predators: naiveté and predator recognition. Oecologia 171:367–377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Apfelbach R, Blanchard C, Blanchard R, Hayes R, McGregor I (2005) The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 29:1123–1144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Banks P, Dickman C (2007) Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naiveté. Trends Ecol Evol 22:229–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett C, Napier J (1953) The form and mobility of the fibula in metatherian mammals. J Anat 87:207–213

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednekoff P, Blumstein D (2009) Peripheral visibility influences marmot vigilance. Behav Ecol 20:1111–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J, Swenson JE, Persson I-L (2001) Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions. Science 291:1036–1039

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Daniel J, Evans C (2001) Yellow-footed rock-wallaby group size effects reflect a trade-off. Ethology 107:655–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Daniel J (2002) Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners. Behav Ecol 13:657–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Mari M, Daniel J, Ardron J, Griffin A, Evans C (2002) Olfactory predator recognition: wallabies may have to learn to be wary. Anim Conserv 5:87–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Daniel J, Springett B (2004) A test of the multi-predator hypothesis: rapid loss of antipredator behavior after 130 years of isolation. Ethology 110:919–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D (2006) The multipredator hypothesis and the evolutionary persistence of antipredator behavior. Ethology 112:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein D, Daniel J, Evans C (2006) JWatcher. UCLA. Accessed via: www.jwatcher.ucla.edu

  • Blumstein D, Lea A, Olson L, Martin J (2010) Heritability of anti-predatory traits: vigilance and locomotor performance in marmots. J Evol Biol 23:879–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bouskila A, Blumstein D (1992) Rules of thumb for predation hazard assessments: predictions from a dynamic model. Am Nat 139:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown O (2006) Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) extinction on the Australian mainland in the mid-Holocene: multicausality and ENSO intensification. Alcheringa 31:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, Ferrari M, Elvidge C, Ramnarine I, Chivers D (2013) Phenotypically plastic neophobia: a response to variable predation risk. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:1756

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper W, Vitt L, Hedges R, Huey R (1990) Locomotor impairment and defense in gravid lizards (Eumeces laticeps): behavioral shift in activity may offset costs of reproduction in an active forager. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett L (ed) (1995) The dingo in Australia and Asia. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson G (1996) Anti-predator behaviour in marsupials. In: Coulson G, Croft D (eds) Comparison of marsupials and placental behaviour. Filander Verlag, Fürth, pp 158–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox J, Lima S (2006) Naiveté and an aquatic–terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators. Trends Ecol Evol 21:674–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz J, Sutherland D, Anderson D, Glen A, Tores P, Leung L (2013) Antipredator responses of koomal (Trichosurus vulpecula hypoleucus) against introduced and native predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:1329–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickman C, Doncaster C (1984) Responses of small mammals to red fox (Vulpes vulpes) odour. J Zool 204:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop-Hayden KL, Rehage JS (2011) Antipredator behavior and cue recognition by multiple Everglades prey to a novel cichlid predator. Behaviour 148:795–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery TF, Szalay FS (1982) Bohra paulae: a new giant fossil tree kangaroo (Marsupialia: Macropodidae) from New South Wales, Australia. Aust Mamm 5:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery TF (1989) Phylogeny of the Macropodoidea: a study on convergence. In: Grigg GC, Jarman PJ, Hume ID (eds) Kangaroos, wallabies and rat-kangaroos. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, pp 1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery T, Martin R, Szalay A (eds) (1996) Tree-kangaroos: a curious natural history. Reed Books Australia Port Melbourne, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Gesser S (1996) Anti-predator behaviour of the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) at Burrendon Dam. N.S.W. Hons Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer O, Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9 pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

  • Heise-Pavlov S, Anderson C, Moshier A (2014) Studying food preferences in captive cryptic folivores can assist on conservation planning: the case of the Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus lumholtzi). Aust Mamm 36:200–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocknull S, Zhao J, Feng Y, Webb G (2007) Responses of quaternary rainforest vertebrates to climate change in Australia. Earth Planet Sci Lett 264:317–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jędrzejewski W, Rychlik L, Jędrzejewska B (1993) Responses of bank voles to odours of seven species of predators: experimental data and their relevance to natural predator-vole relationships. Oikos 68:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones F (1929) Man’s place among the mammals. Edward Arnold and Co., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M, Stoddart M (1998) Reconstruction of the predatory behaviour of the extinct marsupial thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus). J Zool 246:239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanowski J, Winter J, Simmons T, Tucker N (2003) Conservation of Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo on the Atherton Tablelands. Ecol Manag Restor 4:220–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs E, Crowther M, Webb J, Dickman C (2012) Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation. Oecologia 168:947–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti DC, Johnson NA, Ajie BC, Otto SP, Hendry AP, Blumstein DT, Coss RG, Donohue K, Foster SA (2009) Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol Evol 24:487–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance W (1990) Comparative responses of five arboreal marsupials to tropical forest fragmentation. J Mammal 71:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long J, Archer M, Flannery T, Hand S (2002) Prehistoric mammals of Australia and New Guinea: one hundred million years of evolution. University of New South Wales Press, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (1995) Field observations of predation on Bennett’s tree-kangaroo (Dendrolagus bennettianus) by an Amethystine python (Morelia amethystina). Herpetol Rev 26:74–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R (ed) (2005) Tree-Kangaroos of Australia and New Guinea. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan D, Woolhouse A (1997) Predator odors as repellents to brushtail possums and rabbits. In: Mason J (ed) Repellents in wildlife management. National Wildlife Research Center, Ft. Collins, pp 241–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schwarze D (ed) (2006) Chemical ecology of vertebrates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mella V, Cooper C, Davies S (2010) Predator odour does not influence trappability of southern brown bandicoots (Isoodon obesulus) and common brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Aust J Zool 58:267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nernesian C, Banks P, McArthur C (2012) Behavioural responses to indirect and direct predator cues by a mammalian herbivore, the common brushtail possum. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell G (1999) Australia’s tree-kangaroos: current issues in their conservation. Wildl Res 87:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte D, Mason J, Epple G, Aronov E, Campbell D (1994) Why are predator urines aversive to prey? J Chem Ecol 20:1505–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pays O, Dubot A-L, Jarman PJ, Loisel P, Goldizen AW (2009) Vigilance and its complex synchrony in the red-necked pademelon, Thylogale thetis. Behav Ecol 20:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett K, Hik D, Newsome A, Pech R (2005) The influence of predation risk on foraging behaviour of brushtail possums in Australian woodlands. Wildl Res 32:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux GJ, Warburton NM (2008) A new Pleistocene tree-kangaroo (Diprotodontia: Macropodidae) from the Nullarbor Plain of South-Central Australia. J Vertebr Paleontol 28:463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Procter-Gray E (1985) The behavior and ecology of Lumholtz’s tree kangaroo, Dendrolagus lumholtzi (Marsupialia: Macropodidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter-Gray E, Ganslosser U (1986) The individual behaviors of Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo: repertoire and taxonomic implications. J Mammal 67:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Government (2011) Lumholtz’s tree-kangaroo; Department of Environment and Resource Management. http://www.derm.qld.gov.au/wildlife-ecosystems/wildlife/threatened_plants_and_animals.html

  • Roberts RG, Flannery TF, Ayliffe LK, Yoshida H, Olley JM, Prideaux GJ, Laslett GM, Baynes A, Smith MA, Jones R, Smith BL (2001) New ages for the last Australian megafauna: continent-wide extinction about 46,000 years ago. Science 292:1888–1892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell B, Banks P (2007) Do Australian small mammals respond to native and introduced predator odours? Aust J Ecol 32:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen P, Leitner T, Wilton AN, Matisoo-Smith E, Lundeberg J (2004) A detailed picture of the origin of the Australian dingo, obtained from the study of mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12387–12390

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharman G, Maynes G, Eldridge M (1995) Yellow-footed rock-wallaby. In: Strahan R (ed) The mammals of Australia. Reed Books, Sydney, pp 391–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1984) The behavioral response race between predator and prey. Am Nat 123:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tree-kangaroo and Mammal Group (2000) Tree-kangaroos on the Atherton Tablelands: rainforest fragments as wildlife habitats. Information for shire councils, land managers and the local community. Available at http://www.tree-kangaroo.net/documents/tkinfo

  • Vernes K, Dennis A, Winter J (2001) Mammalian diet and broad hunting strategy of the dingo (Canis familiaris dingo) in the wet tropical rain forests of Northeastern Australia. Biotropica 33:339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Węsierska M, Walasek G, Kilijanek J, Djavadian R, Turlejski K (2003) Behavior of the gray short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica) in the open field and in response to a new object, in comparison with the rat. Behav Brain Res 143:31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woinarski J, Burbidge A, Harrison P (eds) (2012) The action plan for Australian mammals 2012. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, VIC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wroe S, Clausen P, McHenry C, Moreno K, Cunningham E (2007) Computer simulation of feeding behaviour in the thylacine and dingo as a novel test for convergence and niche overlap. Proc Biol Sci 274:2819–2828

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study would not have been possible without the caretakers of the wildlife sanctuary ‘The Wildlife Habitat’ in Port Douglas and wildlife rehabilitator Margit Cianelli who granted access to the animals. Many students of the Center for Rainforest Studies at The School for Field Studies assisted in data collection while the Center provided logistic support. A special thanks to Jay Goldberg who was willing to present parts of this study at CSiV 2014. The study was done under the Ethics Permit CA 2011/02/487 and the scientific permit WISP089610011 granted to Sigrid Heise-Pavlov.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Rainforest Studies at the School for Field Studies, Yungaburra, QLD, Australia

    Sigrid R. Heise-Pavlov

Authors
  1. Sigrid R. Heise-Pavlov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrid R. Heise-Pavlov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA

    Bruce A. Schulte

  2. Department of Chemistry, Hendrix College, Conway, Arkansas, USA

    Thomas E. Goodwin

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA

    Michael H. Ferkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Heise-Pavlov, S.R. (2016). Evolutionary Aspects of the Use of Predator Odors in Antipredator Behaviors of Lumholtz’s Tree-Kangaroos (Dendrolagus lumholtzi). In: Schulte, B., Goodwin, T., Ferkin, M. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22026-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation