Informing Our Interventions with the Wisdom of the Sages: Biblical and Rabbinic Inspiration for Fostering Sensitivity Towards Individuals with Disabilities

  • Nava R. SiltonEmail author


This chapter presents Jewish perspectives on disabilities that informed the creation of two prosocial interventions to enhance typical children’s sensitivity, intentions, and attitudes towards children with special needs. The first intervention involved a four-part curriculum designed to teach typical students about autism, blindness, cerebral palsy, and deafness. The second intervention introduced a children’s television show, which highlights the special strengths and abilities of individuals with disabilities. Drawing on lessons and stories from traditional Jewish teachings, the chapter calls for children to be better educated to recognise the inherent value and unique strengths of children living with disabilities.


Sensitivity Disabilities Education Special needs Inclusion Cognitive consistence theory Instructional videos Peer strategies 


  1. Abramson, S. (2004). Attitudes of high school students to special needs pupils: Comparison between students in Jewish day schools with and without special education programs (pp. 1–70). Ann Arbor: Proquest Info and Learning Company.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, S. K., & Morgan, S. B. (2000). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer presented as obese: Does a medical explanation for the obesity make a difference? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 25, 137–148.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosworth, R. G., & Dobkins, K. R. (2002). The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers and hearing nonsigners. Brain and Cognition, 49, 152–169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, J. M., Ferguson, J. E., Herzinger, C. V., Jackson, J. N., & Marino, C. A. (2004). Combined descriptive and explanatory information improve peers’ perceptions of autism. Reseach in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caron, M., Mottron, L., Rainville, C., & Chouinard, S. (2004). Do high functioning persons with autism present superior spatial abilities? Neuropsychologia, 42, 467–481.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. DiSalvo, C. A., & Oswald, D. P. (2002). Peer-mediated interventions to increase the social interaction of children with autism: Consideration of peer expectancies. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(4), 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eruvin 54B. The story of Rabbi Pereidah.Google Scholar
  9. Exodus, 4: Verse 10.Google Scholar
  10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, J. (1996). A Jewish school model for moral education. Journal of Jewish Education, 62(2), 37–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedrich, S., Morgan, S. B., & Devine, C. (1996). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with Tourette’s syndrome. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 307–319.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Genesis, 1: Verse 27.Google Scholar
  14. Genesis 25: Verse 29.Google Scholar
  15. Genesis 27: Verse 1.Google Scholar
  16. Genesis 29: Verse 17.Google Scholar
  17. Genesis, 32: Verses 25–31.Google Scholar
  18. Genesis 48: Verses 8–20.Google Scholar
  19. Greene, W. (2006). Across the religious spectrum: Orthodox, conservative, and reform. In J. Z. Abrams & W. C. Gaventa (Eds.), Jewish theological approaches to the human experience of disability: A primer for rabbis and rabbinical students (pp. 9–25). Binghamton: Haworth Press. (Co-published in Journal of Religion, Disability and Health, 10, 3–4).Google Scholar
  20. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iavaraone, A., Patruno, M., Galeone, F., Chieffi, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2007). Brief report: Error pattern in an autistic savant calendar calculator. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 775–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jerusalem Talmud Horayot. The story of Rabbi Yochanan.Google Scholar
  23. Juvonen J. (1992). Negative peer reactions from the perspective of the reactor. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 314–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1967. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kings, I. Chap. 19: Verse 12.Google Scholar
  26. Matawa, C. (2009). Exploring the musical interests and abilities of blind and partially sighted children and young people with retinopathy of prematurity. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 27, 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, S. B., Walker, M., Bieberich, A., & Bell, S. (1996). The Shared Activities Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Memphis: University of Memphis.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, S. B., Biebrich, A. A., Walker, M., & Schwerdtfeger, H. (1998). Children’s willingness to share activities with a physically handicapped peer: Am I more willing than my classmates? Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 23(6), 367–375.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mottron, L., Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Hubert, B., & Burack, J. (2006). Enhanced perceptual functioning in autism: an update, and eight principles of autistic perception. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, M. S. (1998). Effects of mainstreaming adolescents with developmental disabilities in a residential summer camp. Journal of Jewish Communal Service, 286–289.Google Scholar
  31. Psalm 145: Verse 17.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenthal, R. (1963). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: The experimenter’s hypotheses as unintended experimental results. American Scientist, 51, 268–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosenthal, R. (1989). Experimenter expectancy covert communication and meta-analytic methods. Address delivered to the 97th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  34. Sifre Deuteronomy, Ekev. Follow the Lord your God (Deuteronomy 13: 5).Google Scholar
  35. Silton, N. R. (2009). Fostering knowledge, positive intentions and attitudes of typical children towards children with autism (pp. 1–108). Ann Arbor: Proquest Info and Learning Company.Google Scholar
  36. Siperstein, G. N., & Bak, J. (1977). Instruments to measure children’s attitudes toward the handicapped: Adjective checklist and activity preference list. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Boston.Google Scholar
  37. Siperstein, G. N., & Bak, J. (1980). Improving children’s attitudes toward blind peers. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 132–135.Google Scholar
  38. Sprafkin, J. N., Gadow, K. D., & Grayson, P. (1984). Television and the emotionally disturbed, learning disabled, and mentally retarded child: A review. Advances in Learning & Behavioral Disabilities, 3, 151–213.Google Scholar
  39. Swaim, K. F., & Morgan, S. B. (2001). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer with autistic behaviors: Does a brief educational intervention have an effect? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(2), 195–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Talmud Tractate Taanit, 20B. The story of Rabbi Elazar.Google Scholar
  41. Talmud Tractate Ta’anit 27B. The story of Rabbi Haninah.Google Scholar
  42. Teller, C. (1995). And from Jerusalem, His word: Stories and Insights of Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach Zt”l. New York: New York City Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  43. Weiner, B. (1993). On sin versus sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957–965.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Yuker, H. E. (1994). Variables that influence attitudes toward people with disabilities: Conclusions from the data. Psychological Perspectives on Disability—A Special Issue of the Journal on Social Behavior and Personality, 9(5), 3–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMarymount Manhattan CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations