Skip to main content

Purposeful Fulfillment of Creative Potential

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Contradictions in Education

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 1))

Abstract

Creativity is a skill that many consider essential for success in school, career, and life (Florida, The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New York, 2002; Florida, The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. HarperBusiness, New York, 2005; Guilford, Am Psychol 5:444–454, 1950). For this reason, creativity has become an imperative. Companies want employees who can create the next popular app or who can shake up the industry with an innovative product, process, or idea. Teachers want creative students who can take knowledge that they are taught and apply it in new ways. And parents want creative teachers who can deliver ideas in interesting and engaging ways to their students. Although creativity can have a dark side (Cropley, The dark side of creativity: what is it? In: Cropley DH, Cropley AJ, Kaufman JC, Runco MA (eds) The dark side of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–14, 2010), it is generally seen in a positive light—that creativity is beneficial. It is therefore no surprise that many attempts have been made to promote and nurture creativity (e.g., De Bono, Serious creativity: using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. HarperCollins, New York, 1992; Renzulli, The three-ring conception of giftedness: a developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In: Sternberg RJ, Davidson JE (eds) Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 217–245, 2005). Although many resources have been expended on such creativity training, the results have been mixed (Plucker, Beghetto, Dow, Educ Psychol 39:83–96, 2004). This is partly because creative behaviors that really make an impact within genuine contexts, such as schools and workplaces, are difficult to teach (e.g., Nickerson, Enhancing creativity. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 392–430, 1999).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman, P. L., & Heggestad, E. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121(2), 219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multidomain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7(1), 35–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in “creativity”? A specialization-differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01041.

  • Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3–13, 43(4), 371–381. doi:10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Lubart, T., & Besançon, M. (in press). Peaks, slumps and bumps: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Tan, M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2013). The genetics of creativity: The generative and receptive sides of the creativity equation. In O. Vartanian, A. Bristol, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 71–93). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 266–276. doi:10.1037/a0036618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. (in press). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity: What is it? In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 1–14). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity: Using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fink, A., Benedek, M., Grabner, R. H., Staudt, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Creativity meets neuroscience: Experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking. Methods, 42(1), 68–76. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new globalcompetition for talent. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. E. (1966). A measurement of creativity in western civilization. American Anthropologist, 68(6), 1384–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R., & Pals, J. L. (2000). Creative potential, creative achievement, and personal growth. Journal of Personality, 68(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaussi, K. S., Randel, A. E., & Dionne, S. D. (2007). I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2), 247–258. doi:10.1080/10400410701397339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reason in cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 302–326). Cambridge, UK/New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative–but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143–155. doi:10.2190/26HQ-VHE8-GTLN-BJJM.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi:10.1037/a0013688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35(3), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibeuker, S. W., De Dreu, C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: Distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleibeuker, S. W., Koolschijn, P., Jolles, D. D., Schel, M. A., De Dreu, C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2013). Prefrontal cortex involvement in creative problem solving in middle adolescence and adulthood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., & Guignard, J. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., & Soenens, B. (2006). A developmental contextual perspective on identity construction in emerging adulthood: Change dynamics in commitment formation and commitment evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 366–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science, 25, 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1958). Emotional blocks to creativity. Journal of Individual Psychology, 14, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1981). Picasso: His life and work. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perl, J. (2005). New art city. Manhattan at mid-century. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Education Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated. Roeper Review, 21(1), 36–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razoumnikova, O. M. (2000). Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: An EEG investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 217–245). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1954). Toward a theory of creativity. Etc: A Review of General Semantic, 11, 249–260.Rostan, S. M. (1998) A study of the development of young artists: The emergence of an artistic and creative identity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostan, S. M. (1998). A study of the development of young artists: The emergence of an artistic and creative identity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 278–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity: A critical review. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–148. doi:10.1037/a0014940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M., & Swan, A. (2004). de Kooning. New York, NY: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinio, P. P. L., & Leder, H. (2013). The means to art’s end: Styles, creative devices, and the challenge of art. In O. Vartanian, A. S. Bristol, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The neuroscience of creativity (pp. 273–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo P. L. Tinio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tinio, P.P.L., Barbot, B. (2017). Purposeful Fulfillment of Creative Potential. In: Beghetto, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creative Contradictions in Education. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21923-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21924-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics