Advertisement

Merger Mania? The Finnish Higher Education Experience

  • Timo AarrevaaraEmail author
  • Ian R. Dobson
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 46)

Abstract

This chapter provides a description of the development of Finnish higher education in recent decades, with a particular focus on institutional mergers. Mergers between like organisations are generally promoted as one of the paths to improved efficiency and effectiveness, often as a part of government programs of structural reform. University mergers were incidental to a new governance reforming Universities Act which took effect from 2010, but some people have incorrectly assumed that mergers were related directly to that new legislation. Several polytechnics, the other half of Finland’s binary higher education, have similarly subjected themselves to mergers, also during a period of reforming legislation. Although it has not yet been mooted, future mergers might occur between universities and polytechnics. The third strand of merger activity has been between public research institutions and university departments, this time at the behest of the government.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education System Regional City National Innovation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarrevaara, T., & Dobson, I. R. (2012). Satisfaction guaranteed! A tale of two systems. In P. J. Bentley, H. Coates, I. R. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, & V. L. Meek (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world. Advice from the CAP survey (The Changing Academy, Vol. 7, pp. 103–123). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I., & Elander, C. (2009). Brave new world: Higher education reform in Finland. Higher Education Management and Policy, 21(2), 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahola, S. (1997). ‘Different but equal’ – Student expectations and the Finnish dual higher education policy. European Journal of Education, 32(3), 291–302.Google Scholar
  4. Arthur, L. (2011). Leading on the edge of chaos: Mergers in higher education. In K. Krause, M. Buckridge, C. Grimmer, & S. Purbrick-Illek (Eds.), Research and development in higher education: Reshaping higher education (Vol. 34, pp. 13–27). Milperra, NSW: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.Google Scholar
  5. ARWU (Academic Ranking of World Universities). (2015). Academic ranking of world universities 2014. Press Release. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/Academic-Ranking-of-World-Universities2014-Press-Release.html
  6. Aula, H.-M., & Tienari, J. (2011). Becoming ‘world-class’? Reputation-building in a university merger. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7(1), 7–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aula, H.-M., Tienari, J., & Aarrevaara, T. (2015). Built for excellence? The merger of Finland’s Aalto University. Non-published paper in review process.Google Scholar
  8. Calderon, A. (2012, September 2). Massification continues to transform higher. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20120831155341147
  9. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Vol. 17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson, I. (2008, April 13). Polytechnics that call themselves universities. University World News. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=2008041014313989
  11. Maassen, P., Kallioinen, O., Keränen, P., Penttinen, M., Spaapen, J., Wiedenhofer, R., Kajaste, M., & Mattila, J. (2012). From the bottom up – Evaluation of RDI activities of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences. Publications of the Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council 7.Google Scholar
  12. MinEdu. (1996). Higher education in Finland. Finland: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  13. MinEdu. (2015). Towards a future proof system for higher education and research in Finland. Publications of the Ministry on Education and Culture, Finland 2015: 11.Google Scholar
  14. Mustajoki, A., & Teeri, T. (2015). Innovaatioiden perusta murenee – Yhdeksän ehdotusta yliopistojärjestelmän korjaamiseksi. Elinkeinoelämän valtuuskunnan julkaisu, (43). Available at www.eva.fi
  15. Puusa, A., & Kekäle, J. (2013). Commitment in the context of a merger. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(1), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sheil, T. (2009, February 6–7). Moving beyond university rankings: Developing a world class university system in Australia. Presentation at the International Symposium on University Ranking, Leiden.Google Scholar
  17. THE (Times Higher Education). (2015). World university rankings 2014–15. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2015/world-ranking#/sort/0/direction/asc
  18. UNIFI. (2015). Reports on structural development. Retrieved from http://www.unifi.fi/toiminta/rake/
  19. University of the Arts. (2013). About us. Retrieved from http://www.uniarts.fi/en/about-us
  20. Virtanen, T. (2008). Merging and privatising to reach for the top: A new Finnish university of technology, business, and art and design. University reform in Finland and Japan. In T. Aarrevaara & F. Maruyama (Eds.), Higher education reform in Finland and Japan. Higher education management and finance. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland
  2. 2.School of Education and ArtsFederation University AustraliaMount HelenAustralia

Personalised recommendations