Advertisement

Mergers in Norwegian Higher Education

  • Svein KyvikEmail author
  • Bjørn Stensaker
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 46)

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview and analysis of mergers in Norwegian higher education. We distinguish between three phases of mergers: state-initiated forced mergers of regional colleges in the first half of the 1990s, voluntary merger initiatives and mergers between higher education institutions from the turn of the millennium to 2013, and state-initiated forced ‘voluntary’ mergers from 2014 on. In 1994, the non-university higher education sector was reorganised through the merger of 98 professional and vocationally-oriented colleges into 26 university colleges. This was followed by many voluntary merger initiatives, primarily between university colleges, which were planned as a strategy for the merged university colleges to apply for university status. Only four of these processes were completed, leading to a 2014 governmental initiative to further reduce the number of higher education institutions through a policy of forced ‘voluntary’ mergers. By using an institutional logic perspective as a starting point for the analysis of this development, the chapter argues that different logics fit well with mergers as a solution to perceived problems in the sector, and that this makes mergers more attractive throughout the sector.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education System Institutional Logic Regional College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bower, J. L. (2001). Not all M&As are alike and that matters. Harvard Business Review, 79, 92–101.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2003). New public management? The transformation of ideas and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system. Academic organisation in cross-national perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Fumasoli, T., & Huisman, J. (2013). Strategic agency and system diversity: Conceptualizing institutional positioning in higher education. Minerva, 51, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gumport, P. (2000). Academic re-structuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39, 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2003). Institutional mergers in higher education: Lessons from international experience. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kyvik, S. (1981). The Norwegian regional colleges: A study of the establishment and implementation of a reform in higher education. Oslo: Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  9. Kyvik, S. (1983). Decentralisation of higher education and research in Norway. Comparative Education, 19, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kyvik, S. (2004). Structural changes in higher education systems in western Europe. Higher Education in Europe, 29, 393–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kyvik, S. (2009). The dynamics of change in higher education. Expansion and contraction in an organisational field. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Kyvik, S., & Stensaker, B. (2013). Factors affecting the decision to merge: The case of strategic mergers in Norwegian higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 19, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordling, J. (1996). The Mid-Sweden University College – A recent amalgamation. In U. Dahlløf & S. Selander (Eds.), Expanding colleges and new universities (pp. 327–339). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wicksell International.Google Scholar
  15. Rowley, G. (1997). Mergers in higher education: A strategic analysis. Higher Education Quarterly, 51, 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations. Ideas, interests, and identities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. St.meld. 18. (2014–2015). Konsentrasjon for kvalitet. Strukturreform i universitets- og høyskolesektoren. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartamentet.Google Scholar
  19. Stensaker, B. (2004). The transformation of organizational identities. Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
  20. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logic perspective. A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ursin, J., Aittola, H., Henderson, C., & Välimaa, J. (2010). Is education getting lost in university mergers? Tertiary Education and Management, 16, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NIFU Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and EducationOsloNorway
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations