Advertisement

A Complex and Messy Merger: The Road to University of Eastern Finland

  • Jarkko TirronenEmail author
  • Hanna-Mari Aula
  • Timo Aarrevaara
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 46)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine the university merger between the University of Joensuu and the University of Kuopio, which resulted in the establishment of the University of Eastern Finland (UEF). In particular, we look at the key goals and the rationales of the merger, the way the merger process progressed, and how it was implemented. The aim of this chapter is to describe and analyze the change process of the UEF merger especially from the viewpoints of education, research, organization and management. Even though the universities committed to the process and the process was implemented bottom-up, the merger was closely linked to the national structural development program outlined by the Ministry of Education and Culture.

Keywords

Management Group Strategic Alliance Doctoral Education Interdisciplinary Cooperation Merger Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarrevaara, T. (2012). The Finnish universities in the conflicting demands of autonomy and relevance. In C. Koscielnak & J. Makowski (Eds.), Freedom, equity, university (pp. 143–153). Warsaw: Civic Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. R., & Elander, C. (2009). Brave new world – Higher education reform in Finland. Higher Education Management Policy, 21(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aarrevaara, T., Aaltonen, M., Ansala, L., Huttunen, J., Ryynänen-Karjalainen, L., Saarilammi, M.-L., & Talvinen, K. (2011). Itä-Suomen yliopiston laadunvarmistusjärjestelmän auditointi (Audit of the Quality Assurance System of the University of Eastern Finland, In Finnish). FINHEEC Publications 5:2011. Helsinki: FINHEEC.Google Scholar
  4. Becher, T. (1987). Disciplinary discourse. Studies in Higher Education, 12(3), 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergquist, W. H., & Pawlak, K. (2007). Engaging the six cultures of the academy –The four cultures of the academy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Buono, A. F., & Bowditch, J. L. (1989). The human side of mergers and acquisitions: Managing collision between people, culture and organizations. San Francisco: Josey- Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Harman, K. (2002). Merging divergent campus cultures into coherent educational communities: Challenges for higher education leaders. Higher Education, 44(1), 91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2003). Institutional mergers in higher education: Lessons for international experience. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harman, G., & Harman, K. (2008). Strategic mergers of strong institutions to enhance competitive advantage. Higher Education Policy, 21, 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerr, C. (2003/1963). The uses of the university (5th ed.). Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, J., & Samels, J. E. (1994). Merging colleges for mutual growth. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  13. MINEDU. (2005). OECD thematic review of tertiary education. Country background report for Finland. Publications of the Ministry of Education, Finland 2005: 38. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  14. MINEDU. (2006). Korkeakoulujen rakenteellisen kehittämisen periaatteet. Keskustelumuistio 8.3.2006 [Principles for the structural development of higher education institutes. Memorandum 8.3.2006.] Opetusministeriön monisteita 2006:2. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  15. MINEDU. (2007a). Yliopistojen taloudellisen ja hallinnollisen aseman uudistaminen [Reform of the financial and administrative status of universities]. Opetusministeriön työryhmämuistioita ja selvityksiä 2007:2. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  16. MINEDU. (2007b). Itä-Suomen yliopisto – tulevaisuuden yliopisto ajassa [The University of Eastern Finland – The Future of University Today]. Opetusministeriön työryhmämuistioita ja selvityksiä 2007:15. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  17. MINEDU. (2008). Korkeakoulujen rakenteellisen kehittämisen suuntaviivat vuosille 2008–2011 [Guidelines for the structural development of higher education institutes for years 2008–2011]. 7.3.2008. Helsinki: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  18. Norgård, J. D., & Skodvin, O.-J. (2002). The importance of geography and culture in mergers: A Norwegian institutional case study. Higher Education, 44(1), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pietilä, M. (2013). The many faces of research profiling: Academic leaders’ conceptions of research steering. Higher Education, 67(3), 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinheiro, R., Geschwind, L., & Aarrevaara, T. (2014). Nested tensions and interwoven dilemmas in higher education: The view from the Nordic countries. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 233–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Price, D. J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and non-science. In C. E. Nelson & D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington: Heath Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  22. Puusa, A., & Kekäle, J. (2013). Commitment in the context of a merger. Tertiary Education and Management, 19(1), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tirronen, J. (2008). Itä-Suomen yliopiston prosessiarviointi I [Process evaluation of project for the University of Eastern Finland I]. Kuopio: University of Kuopio & University of Joensuu.Google Scholar
  24. Tirronen, J. (2011a). Itä-Suomen yliopistohankkeen prosessiarviointi. Osat II & III [Process evaluation of project for the University of Eastern Finland. Parts II & III]. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland. General Series 6. Kuopio: University of Eastern Finland.Google Scholar
  25. Tirronen, J. (2011b). Murroksesta tasapainoon – Itä-Suomen yliopiston syntyprosessi. [From turning point to equilibrium: The emergence of the University of Eastern Finland]. Hallinnon tutkimus, 30(3), 207–220.Google Scholar
  26. Tirronen, J. (2012). Benchmarking data of University of Eastern Finland. Benchmarking project between University of Southern Denmark and University of Eastern Finland. Non-published Working Paper.Google Scholar
  27. Tirronen, J. (2014). The path towards merger – The merger process of University of Eastern Finland. In Y. Cai & V. Kohtamäki (Eds.), Transformation of higher education in innovation systems in China and Finland (pp. 96–110). Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Tirronen, J., & Nokkala, T. (2009). Structural development of Finnish universities: Achieving competitiveness and academic excellence. Higher Education Quarterly, 63(3), 219–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Turunen, I. (2008). Modernization of higher education. In T. Aarrevaara & F. Maruyama (Eds.), University reform in Finland and Japan. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Google Scholar
  30. UEF. (2010). Strategian toimenpideohjelma. (Action plan for strategy). Itä-suomen yliopiston hallituksen kokous 22.3.2010.Google Scholar
  31. Van de Ven, A. (2007). Engaged scholarship. A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jarkko Tirronen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hanna-Mari Aula
    • 2
  • Timo Aarrevaara
    • 3
  1. 1.KuopioFinland
  2. 2.Department of Management StudiesAalto University School of BusinessHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LaplandRovaniemiFinland

Personalised recommendations