Skip to main content

Linearity Is Strictly More Powerful Than Contiguity for Encoding Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithms and Data Structures (WADS 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Linearity and contiguity are two parameters devoted to graph encoding. Linearity is a generalisation of contiguity in the sense that every encoding achieving contiguity k induces an encoding achieving linearity k, both encoding having size \(\Theta (k.n)\), where n is the number of vertices of G. In this paper, we prove that linearity is a strictly more powerful encoding than contiguity, i.e. there exists some graph family such that the linearity is asymptotically negligible in front of the contiguity. We prove this by answering an open question asking for the worst case linearity of a cograph on n vertices: we provide an \(O(\log n/\log \log n)\) upper bound which matches the previously known lower bound.

This work was partially funded by a grant from Région Rhône-Alpes and by the delegation program of CNRS.

This work was partially funded by the Vietnam Institute for Advanced Study in Mathematics (VIASM) and by the Vietnam National Fondation for Science and Technology Developement (NAFOSTED).

This work was partially funded by Fondecyt Postdoctoral grant 3140527 and Núcleo Milenio Información y Coordinación en Redes (ACGO).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apostolico, A., Drovandi, G.: Graph compression by BFS. Algorithms 2(3), 1031–1044 (2009)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Boldi, P., Vigna, S.: The webgraph framework I: compression techniques. In: WWW 2004, pp. 595–602. ACM (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boldi, P., Vigna, S.: Codes for the world wide web. Internet Mathematics 2(4), 407–429 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Boldi, P., Santini, M., Vigna, S.: Permuting web and social graphs. Internet Mathematics 6(3), 257–283 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Corneil, D., Lerchs, H., Burlingham, L.: Complement reducible graphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics 3(3), 163–174 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Crespelle, C., Gambette, P.: Efficient neighborhood encoding for interval graphs and permutation graphs and O(n) breadth-first search. In: Fiala, J., Kratochvíl, J., Miller, M. (eds.) IWOCA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5874, pp. 146–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Crespelle, C., Gambette, P.: (nearly-)tight bounds on the contiguity and linearity of cographs. Theoretical Computer Science 522, 1–12 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gavoille, C., Peleg, D.: The compactness of interval routing. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 12(4), 459–473 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, P., Golumbic, M., Kaplan, H., Shamir, R.: Four strikes against physical mapping of DNA. Journal of Computational Biology 2(1), 139–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lovász, L.: Graph minor theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 43(1), 75–86 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maserrat, H., Pei, J.: Neighbor query friendly compression of social networks. In: KDD 2010, pp. 533–542. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts, F.: Representations of Indifference Relations. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Turan, G.: On the succinct representation of graphs. Discr. Appl. Math. 8, 289–294 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, R., Lau, F., Zhao, Y.: Hamiltonicity of regular graphs and blocks of consecutive ones in symmetric matrices. Discr. Appl. Math. 155(17), 2312–2320 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Crespelle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Crespelle, C., Le, TN., Perrot, K., Phan, T.H.D. (2015). Linearity Is Strictly More Powerful Than Contiguity for Encoding Graphs. In: Dehne, F., Sack, JR., Stege, U. (eds) Algorithms and Data Structures. WADS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21840-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21840-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21839-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21840-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics