Paul Klee’s Unbound Creativity

Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 119)

Abstract

Does creativity just happen? Is it self-generated? These questions bring about more questions, some of which can be answered by looking at the creative imagination of the artists themselves, how they explain and value their own artworks. A univocal definition of creativity is problematic, since it manifests itself at different levels and its range is potentially unlimited. Being a process, imaginative creativity is in flux.

Following Margaret Boden, I distinguish three types of creativity: combinational (associations of ideas), exploratory (changes in conceptual space), and transformational, the highest and most radical form. Specifically, Paul Klee’s art includes all these forms leading to a unique, comprehensive world-view in which the cosmos shapes a universe filled with humans and angels, the moon and the earth. Klee transforms these “objects” by combining harmony and the unpredictable, whereby uniformity is ruled out. Out of this “swerve” (clinamen), the most extraordinary imaginative paintings come into view. By imaginatively transforming the human figure, Klee reveals the full import of what the cosmic fullness of being (pleroma) can bring to art.

Keywords

Creative imagination Plenitude Subjectivity Perception Linearism (or linearity) 

References

  1. Boden, Margaret A. 2010. Creativity & art – Three roads to surprise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boulez, Pierre. 1989. Le pays fertile – Paul Klee, ed. Paule Thévenin. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  3. Casati, Roberto, and Achille C. Varzi. 1999. Parts and places – The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Franciscono, Marcel. 1991. Paul Klee – His work and thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hofstadter, Douglas R. 1985. Metamagical Themas – Questing for the essence of mind and pattern. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Klee, Paul. 1918. Dogmatic composition. Web. http://paintingandframe.com/prints/paul_klee_dogmatic_composition-21020.html. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  7. Klee, Paul. 1920. Rose garden. Figure 4. Web. http://www.wikiart.org/en/paul-klee/rose-garden-1920. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  8. Klee, Paul. 1921a. Comedy. Web. http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/klee-comedy-n05657. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  9. Klee, Paul. 1921b. Crystal gradation. Web. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradation_(art)#mediaviewer/File:Crystal_Gradation.JPG. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  10. Klee, Paul. 1928. A leaf from the book of cities. Web. http://www.pubhist.com/w18999. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  11. Klee, Paul. 1929a. Fig tree. Web. http://www.artofeurope.com/klee/kle11.htm Accessed 26 July 2014.
  12. Klee, Paul. 1929b. Highways and byways. Web. http://www.wikiart.org/en/paul-klee/highway-and-byways-1929. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  13. Klee, Paul. 1930. Polyphonic architecture. Web. http://www.pinterest.com/pin/162692605263171604/. Accessed 26 July 2014.
  14. Klee, Paul. 1964. The diaries of Paul Klee – 1898–1918. Ed. Felix Klee. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Klee, Paul. 1985. Théorie de l’art moderne. Trans. and ed. Pierre-Henri Gonthier. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
  16. Sallis, John. 2012. “Klee’s philosophical vision.” In Paul Klee – Philosophical vision: From nature to art, ed. John Sallis. Boston College: McMullen Museum of Art, distributed by The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Valéry, Paul. 1974. Cahiers II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  18. Watson, Stephen H. 2009. Crescent moon over the rational – Philosophical interpretations of Paul Klee. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations