Advertisement

The Naturalistic Axiology of Holmes Rolston III

  • Leszek Pyra
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 119)

Abstract

This paper addresses Rolston’s claim that values may exist without the beholder; expressing such opinion he opposes the prevailing contemporary views. It also shows Rolston’s attempt to work out a provisional intuitive scale of values characteristic of particular organisms. The concept of systemic values is also presented and discussed. It appears that such values are ultimately life-generating processes, and as such definitely deserve man’s respect. Such phenomena constitute the essence of holistic environmental philosophy as developed by Holmes Rolston III.

Keywords

Holistic environmental philosophy Systemic values Evolution Projective nature Species 

References

  1. Callicot, J. Baird. 1980. Animal liberation: a triangular affair. Environmental Ethics 2(4): 311–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Callicot, J. Baird. 1984. Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly 21: 299–309.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, John. 1958. Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Hume, David. 1947. Dialogues concerning natural religion, ed. Henry D. Aiken. New York: T. Nelson.Google Scholar
  5. James, William. 1925. Varieties of religious experience. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
  6. Midgley, Mary. 2002. Beast and man. London/New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  7. Perry, Ralph Barton. 1926. General theory of value. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Pyra, Leszek. 2004. The ‘Is-Ought Question’ once more reconsidered. In Analecta Husserliana, vol. LXXXIII, 203–213. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Rolston III, Holmes. 1988. Environmental ethics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Rolston III, Holmes. 1989. Prometheus books. New York: Philosophy Gone Wild.Google Scholar
  11. Rolston III, Holmes. 1994. Conserving natural value. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy and SociologyPedagogical University of CracowKrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations