My Living Body: The Zero Point of Nature-Mind and the Horizon of Creative Imagination

Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 119)

Abstract

As one who was constantly at pains to clarify his field, its methods, and their results in a manner that was radical and universal, Edmund Husserl, the self-styled perpetual beginner, was explicitly at odds with worldview-oriented philosophy (Weltanschauung) and a scientific project that would assume a natural existence as given (Dasein). He championed an inevitably experiential, pre-theoretical, conditioning life (leib) whose mechanism he described as the life-structure and whose output he demarcated as sense and validity (sinn und geltung). This life-structure is the irreducible composite of my living body, the living social bodies that I have part in, and the lived surrounding world that is the correlate of each (leib, lebendiger generativer Sozialität und lebensumwelt). Together these form an intersubjective, egosomatical ground manifesting the lifeworld (lebenswelt) and, through it, the natural and human sciences (natur und geist). These strata of Husserl’s scientific philosophy are what set apart phenomenology. With the life-structure Husserl established a radical thinking that works systematically to secure the end of systematicity as such in a ruthlessness of inquiry demanding the infinite passage of embodied collectives manifesting, what he called, “truth in motion”—the outer edge of which is the Husserlian philosophy of the event: the in-breaking of the unimaginable something that finds its passage into the imaginal through the life-structure.

Keywords

Life Body Ego Social Event 

References

  1. Bello, Angela Ales. 2009. The divine in Husserl and other explorations, Analecta Husserliana, vol. XCVII. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bernet, Rudolf, Iso Kern, and Eduard Marbach. 1989. An introduction to Husserlian phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cairns, Dorion. 1976. Conversations with Husserl and Fink. Phaenomenologica 66. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  4. Hamauza, Shinji. 2003. From ideas II to nature and spirit. In Essays in celebration of the founding of the organization of phenomenological organizations, eds. Chan-Fai Cheung, Ivan Chvatik, Ion Copoeru, LesterEmbree, Julia Iribarne, and Hans Rainer Sepp, 6 (Web-Published at www.o-p-o.net).
  5. Hughes, Dan. 2011. The Singularity is Here, Scribd. N.p., n.d. Web. 07 April 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, Dan. 2013. Dan Hughes – The Singularity is Here, SoundCloud. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 June 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, Edmund. 1965. “Philosophy as rigorous science” in Phenomenology and the Crisis of Philosophy. Trans. Quentin Lauer. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, Edmund. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Trans. David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Zweiter Teil. 1921–28, ed. Iso Kern, Husserliana: Edmund Husserl – Gesammelte Werke Volume 14. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Husserl, Edmund. 1977. Phenomenological psychology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and André Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher, p. 292.Google Scholar
  12. Husserl, Edmund. 2001. Natur und Geist: Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1927, ed. Michael Weiler, Husserliana 32, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund. 2002. Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919, ed. Michael Weiler, Husserliana: Edmund Husserl Materialienband 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, Edmund. 2006 Spate Texte uber Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934): Die C-Manuskripte, ed. Dieter Lohmar. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Husserl, Edmund. 2008a. Edmund Husserl’s letter to Lucien Lévy-Bruhl. In The new yearbook for phenomenology and phenomenological philosophy, vol. VIII, ed. Burt Hopkins and John Drummond. Durham: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Husserl, Edmund. 2008b. Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937), ed. Rochus Sowa, Husserliana 39. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Ingarden, Roman. 1962. “Edith Stein on Her Activity as an Assistant of Edmund Husserl” in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. XXIII, No. 2. 160–61. Providence: International Phenomenological Society.Google Scholar
  18. Landgrebe, Ludwig, and Welton Donn (eds.). 1981. The Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl: Six Essays. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Melle, Ullrich. 1996. “Nature and Spirit” in Issues in Husserl’s ideas II, ed. Thomas Nenon and Lester Embree. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2002. Husserl at the Limits of Phenomenology, ed. Leonard Lawlor with Bettina Bergo. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rabanaque, Luis Román. 2010. “The Body as Noematic Bridge between Nature and Culture” in Epistemology, Archaeology, Ethics: Current investigations of Husserl’s Corpus, ed. Vandevelde Pol and Luft Sebastian. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  22. Sakakibara, Tetsuya. 1998. “The Relationship between Nature and Spirit in Husserl’s Phenomenology Revisited” in Continental Philosophy Review, 255–272. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Schuhmann, Karl. 1977. Husserl-Chronik: Denk-und Lebensweg Edmund Husserls. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  24. Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1981. The Context of the Phenomenological Movement. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  25. Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1994. The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. 2012. “Possibility, Life’s Ontopoiesis, and the Vindication of the Cosmos” in Phenomenological inquiry, vol. 36, ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka. Hanover: The World Institute for Advanced Phenomenological Research and Learning.Google Scholar
  27. Tymieniecka, Anna-Teresa. 1972. Phenomenology Reflects Upon Itself in The Later Husserl and the Idea of Phenomenology, 2 vols., ed. Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, Analecta Husserliana, Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, Vol. II, p. 15.Google Scholar
  28. Wolfram, Stephen. 2002. A New Kind of Science. Champaign: Wolfram Media.Google Scholar
  29. Wolfram, Stephen. 2013. Universality and Complexity in Cellular Automata (1984). Web: http://www.stephenwolfram.com/publications/articles/ca/84-universality/9/text.html. 02 June 2013.
  30. Zahavi, Dan. 1994. “Husserl’s Phenomenology of the Body” in N°19 Problèmes husserliens, Études phénoménologiques, No. 19. Louvain: Phenomenological Studies Centre of the Catholic University of Louvain.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AberdeenCentre for Modern ThoughtOld AberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations