Advertisement

How the Replacement of the Project Manager Unfolds in IS Projects

  • Tero VartiainenEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 223)

Abstract

Replacement of the Project Manager (RPM) is a known phenomenon in information systems (IS) projects, but scholarly articles on the issue are scarce. To help fill this gap, this study provides an explanation of why RPM occurs in IS projects, how it unfolds over time, and how it affects a project. Based on the analysis of qualitative data, a process model is suggested. The model uses the concept of social mechanisms to explain causal relationships. The activation of deterioration mechanisms initiates the demand or need for RPM, and as a response project healing mechanisms are activated. If RPM is decided upon, handover mechanisms are activated, and after handover, the project experiences post-handover mechanisms. The model is a combination of teleological (goal directed) and dialectical (rival forces) motors, as both the joint and individual goals of the participants motivate RPM. However, the attainment of individual goals in some cases conflicts with others’ goals during the RPM process.

Keywords

Project management IS project Project manager Turnover Process theory Social mechanisms Teleological Dialectical 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Hamid, T.K.: Investigating the impacts of managerial turnover/succession on software project performance. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 9(2), 127–144 (1992)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avgerou, C.: Social mechanisms for causal explanation in social theory based is research. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(8), 399–419 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cleland, D.: Matrix Management Systems Handbook. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dekkers, C., Forselius, P.: Increase ICT project success with concrete scope management. In: Proceedings of the 33rd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2007), Lübeck, Germany, 28–31 Aug 2007, pp. 385–392. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elster, J.: A plea for mechanisms. In: Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 45–73. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Havelka, D., Rajkumar, T.M.: Recovering troubled projects: prescriptions for sustained recovery. Issues Inf. Syst. 7(2), 92–96 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hedström, P., Swedberg, R.: Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay. In: Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 1–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hernes, G.: Real Virtuality. In: Hedström, P., Swedberg, R. (eds.) Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 74–101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kezsbom, D.S., Schilling, D.L., Edward, K.A.: Dynamic Project Management: A Practical Guide for Managers and Engineers. Wiley, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23(1), 67–94 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Langley, A.: Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manage. Rev. 24(4), 691–710 (1999)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liikamaa, K., Vartiainen, T., Pirhonen, M., Aramo-Immonen, H.: Replacing project managers in information technology projects: contradictions that explain the phenomenon. Int. J. Hum. Capital Inf. Technol. Prof. (2015) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Inf. Organ. 17, 2–26 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Newman, M., Robey, D.: A social process model of user-analyst relationships. MIS Q. 16(2), 249–266 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nicholas, J.: Managing Business and Engineering Projects: Concepts and Implementation. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parker, S.K., Skitmore, M.: Project management turnover: causes and effects on project performance. Int. J. Project Manage. 23(3), 205–214 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage, Newbury Park (1990)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peffers, K., Gengler, C.E., Tuunanen, T.: Extending critical success factors: methodology to facilitate broadly participative information systems planning. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 51–85 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez-Repiso, L., Setchi, R., Salmeron, J.L.: Modelling IT projects success: emerging methodologies reviewed. Technovation 27(10), 582–594 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sauer, C., Gemino, A., Reich, B.H.: The impact of size and volatility on IT project performance. Commun. ACM 50(11), 79–84 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trauth, E.M.: Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Ven, A.H., Poole, M.S.: Four process theories explaining development and change in organizations. academy of management. Acad. Manage. Rev. 20(3), 510–540 (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vartiainen, T., Liikamaa, K., Aramo-Immonen, H., Pirhonen, M.: Contract on the use of the data (2013)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vartiainen, T., Salmela, A.: Contract on the use of the data (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 320–330 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wirth, I.: How generic and how industry-specific is the project management profession? Int. J. Project Manage. 14(1), 7–11 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zmud, R.W.: Management of large software development efforts. MIS Q. 4(2), 45–55 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations