Advertisement

Earthquake-Induced Reactivation of Landslides: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

  • Salvatore Martino
Chapter
Part of the Springer Natural Hazards book series (SPRINGERNAT)

Abstract

Earthquake-induced reactivation of landslides is a focus topic in risk management as severe damages and losses have been caused so far from seismically-triggered slope failures. Slope stability conditions under seismic action have been studied for several decades by pseudostatic solutions as well as by sliding block methods that follow the Newmark’s approach. These last ones were recently upgraded by flexible block methods to provide a more constrained evaluation of earthquake-induced displacements, i.e. by considering the landslide mass resonance during seismic shaking. Nevertheless, all these solutions cannot take into account the very complex interactions between seismic waves and slope that are pointed out by several case histories reported in the literature. Such interactions can be simulated by more sophisticated stress-strain numerical models that need very strong constraints to both the geological setting of the slope and the local seismic response. In this regard, a fundamental contribution derives from detailed engineering—geological reconstructions as well as on-site geophysical measurements. Recent studies have made use of theoretical approaches for pointing out the significance of some physical parameters, such as the ratios of characteristic periods related to the seismic wave properties and to the landslide mass geometry, to provide a more exhaustive prevision of earthquake-induced landslide displacements. 

Keywords

Seismic Wave Peak Ground Acceleration Slope Stability Analysis Seismic Input Sine Wave Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank my colleague and friend Luca Lenti who provided the rigorous physical support to the researches carried on together; to Jose Delgado Marchal for the opportunity to discover and study several and very interesting case histories of earthquake-induced landslides in Spain; to Antonella Paciello for her precious contribution to the seismometric measurements in the Italian case studies; to Francesca Bozzano and Gabriele Scarascia Mugnozza, for their guide during several years of scientific co-operations; to my tutor Alberto Prestininzi who gave me the opportunity to approach and to carry on my research.

References

  1. Alfaro, P., Delgado, J., García-Tortosa, F. J., Lenti, L., López, J. A., López-Casado, C., & Martino, S. (2012). Widespread landslides induced by the Mw 5.1 earthquake of 11 May 2011 in Lorca. Engineering Geology, 137–138, 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Sigbjornsson, R., Suhadolc, P., & Margaris, B. (2002). Internet-site for European strong-motion data, European Commission, Research-Directorate General, Environment and Climate Programme. On-line web site: http://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk/ESD/frameset.htm.
  3. Ambraseys, N., & Srbulov, M. (1995). Earthquake induced displacements of slopes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 14, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atakan, K., Ojeda, A., Meghraoui, M., Barka, A. A., Erdik, M., & Bodare, A. (2002). Seismic Hazard in Istanbul following the 17 August 1999 Izmit and 12 November 1999 Düzce Earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(1), 466–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azañón, J. M., Azor, A., Yesares, J., Tsige, M., Mateos, R. M., Nieto, F., et al. (2010). Regional-scale high plasticity clay-bearing formation as controlling factor on landslides in Southeast Spain. Geomorphology, 120, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balassanian, S. Y. U., Martirosyan, A. H., Nazaretian, S. N., Arakelian, A. R., Avanessian, A. S., Igumnov, V. A., & Ruttener, E. (1999a). Seismic hazard assessment in Armenia. Natural Hazards, 18, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balassanian, S. Y. U., Melkoumian, M. G., Arakelian, A. R., & Azarian, A. R. (1999b). Seismic risk assessment for the territory of Armenia and strategy of its mitigation. Natural Hazards, 20, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benito, M. B., Navarro, M., Vidal, F., Gaspar-Escribano, J., Garcia-Rodriguez, M. L., & Martinez-Solares, J. M. (2010). Seismic hazard assessment in the region of Andalusia (Sothern Spain). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 739–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bird, J. F., & Bommer, J. J. (2004). Earthquake losses due to ground failure. Engineering Geology, 75, 147–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bishop, A. W. (1955). The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes. Géotechnique, 5(1), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borcherdt, R. D. (1994). Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthquake Spectra, 10, 617–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouckovalas, G. D., & Papadimitriou, A. G. (2005). Numerical evaluation of slope topography effects on seismic ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25, 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdeau, C., & Havenith, H. B. (2008). Site effects modeling applied to the slope affected by the Suusamyr earthquake (Kyrgyzstan, 1992). Engineering Geology, 97, 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bozzano, F., Cardarelli, E., Cercato, M., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Paciello, A., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2008a). Engineering-geology model of the seismically induced Cerda landslide. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 49(2), 205–226.Google Scholar
  15. Bozzano, F., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Paciello, A., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2008b). Self-excitation process due to local seismic amplification responsible for the reactivation of the Salcito landslide (Italy) on 31 October 2002. Journal Geophysical Research, 113, B10312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bozzano, F., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Paciello, A., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2008c). Self-excitation process due to local seismic amplification and earthquake-induced reactivations of large landslides. In Z. Chen, et al. (Eds.), Landslides and engineered slopes (pp. 1389–1395). London: Taylor and Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-41196-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bozzano, F., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Paciello, A., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2011a). Evidences of landslide earthquake triggering due to self-excitation process. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 100, 861–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bozzano, F., Martino, S., Naso, G., Prestininzi, A., Romeo, R. W., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2004). The large Salcito landslide triggered by the 31st October 2002, Molise earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 20(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
  19. Bozzano, F., Lenti, L., Martino, S., Montagna, A., & Paciello, A. (2011b). Earthquake triggering of landslides in highly jointed rock masses: Reconstruction of the 1783 Scilla rock avalanche (Italy). Geomorphology, 129, 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bray, J. D., & Travasarou, T. (2007). Simplified procedure for estimating earthquake-induced deviatoric slope displacements. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133(4), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cruden, D. M., & Varnes, D. J. (1996). Landslide types and processes. In A. K. Turner & R. L. Schuster (Eds.), Landslides: Investigation and Mitigation (pp. 36–75). Transportation Research Board, Speciation Report 247, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Dalgiç, S. (2004). Factors affecting the greater damage in the Avcılar area of Istanbul during the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 63, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danneels, G., Bourdeau, C., Torgoev, I., & Havenith, H. B. (2008). Geophysical investigation and dynamic modeling of unstable slopes: Case-study of Kainama (Kyrgyzstan). Geophysical Journal International, 175(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Del Gaudio, V., & Wasowski, J. (2007). Directivity of slope dynamic response to seismic shaking. Geophysical Reseach Letters, 34, L12301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Delgado, J., Garrido, J., López-Casado, C., Martino, S., & Peláez, J. A. (2011). On far field occurrence of seismically induced landslides. Engineering Geology, 123, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delgado, J., Garrido, J., Lenti, L., López-Casado, C., Martino, S., & Javier Sierra, F. (2015). Unconventional pseudostatic stability analysis of the Diezma landslide (Granada, Spain) based on a high-resolution engineering-geological model. Engineering Geology, 184, 81–95.Google Scholar
  27. Duman, T. Y., Can, T., Gokceoglu, C., Nefeslioglu, H. A., & Sonmez, H. (2006). Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environmental Geology, 51, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erdik, M., Biro, Y. A., Onur, T., Sesetyan, K., & Birgoren, G. (1999). Assessment of earthquake hazard in Turkey and neighboring regions. Annali di Geofisica, 42, 1125–1138.Google Scholar
  29. Evans, S. G., & Bent, A. L. (2004). The Las Colinas landslide, Santa Tecla: A highly destructive flowslide triggered by the January 13, 2001, El Salvador earthquake. GSA Special Papers, 375, 25–38.Google Scholar
  30. Field, E. H., & Jacob, K. (1995). A comparison and test of various site response estimation techniques, including three that are non reference-site dependent. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85, 1127–1143.Google Scholar
  31. Gallipoli, M., Lapenna, V., Lorenzo, P., Mucciarelli, M., Perrone, A., Piscitelli, S., & Sdao, F. (2000). Comparison of geological and geophysical prospecting techniques in the study of a landslide in southern Italy. European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 4, 117–128.Google Scholar
  32. Havenith, H. B., Strom, A., Jongmans, D., Abdrakhmatov, K., Delvaux, D., & Tre´fois, P. (2003a). Seismic triggering of landslides, part A: Field evidence from the northern Tien Shan. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences, 3, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Havenith, H. B., Vanini, M., Jongmans, D., & Faccioli, E. (2003b). Initiation of earthquake-induced slope failure: Influence of topographical and other site specific amplification effects. Journal of Seismology, 7, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hsieh, S. U., & Lee, C. T. (2011). Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration. Engineering Geology, 122, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutchinson, J. N. (1987). Mechanism producing large displacements in landslides on pre-existing shears. Memoir of the Geological Society of China, 9, 175–200.Google Scholar
  36. Hutchinson, J. N., & Del Prete, M. (1985). Landslide at Calitri, southern Apennines, reactivated by the earthquake of 23rd November 1980. Geologia Applicata e Idrogeologia 1985, XX(1), 9–38.Google Scholar
  37. Hwang, G. S., & Chen, C. H. (2013). A study of the Newmark sliding block displacement functions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 11, 481–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jibson, R. W. (1993). Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacements using Newmark’s sliding block analysis. Transportation Research Record, 1411, 9–17.Google Scholar
  39. Jibson, R. W. (2011). Methods for assessing the stability of slopes during earthquakes—A retrospective. Engineering Geology, 122, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jibson, R. W., Harp, E. L., & Michael, J. M. (1998). A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps: An example from the Los Angeles, California area (pp. 98–113). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report.Google Scholar
  41. Kalkan, E., Gülkan, P., Yilmaz, N., & Çelebi, M. (2009). Reassessment of probabilistic seismic hazard in the Marmara region. BSSA, 99, 2127–2146.Google Scholar
  42. Keefer, D. K. (1984). Landslides caused by earthquakes. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95, 406–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kuhlemeyer, R. L., & Lysmer, J. (1973). Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div ASCE, 99(SM5), 421–427.Google Scholar
  44. Lenti, L., & Martino, S. (2010). New procedure for deriving multifrequential dynamic equivalent signals (LEMA_DES): A test-study based on Italian accelerometric records. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8, 813–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lenti, L., & Martino, S. (2012). The interaction of seismic waves with step-like slopes and its influence on landslide movements. Engineering Geology, 126, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lenti, L., & Martino, S. (2013). A parametric numerical study of the interaction between seismic waves and landslides for the evaluation of the susceptibility to seismically induced displacements. BSSA, 103(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
  47. Loukidis, D., Bandini, P., & Salgado, R. (2003). Stability of seismically loaded slopes using limit analysis. Geotechnique, 15(2), 139–160.Google Scholar
  48. Makdisi, F. I., & Seed, H. B. (1978). Simplified procedure for estimating dam and embankment earthquake-induced deformations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 104(7), 849–867.Google Scholar
  49. Martino, S., Paciello, A., Sadoyan, T., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2007). Dynamic numerical analysis of the giant Vokhchaberd landslide (Armenia). In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Tessaloniki (Greece) 25–28 June 2007. ISBN: 9781402058929, Tessaloniki (Grecia), 25–28 Giugno 2007.Google Scholar
  50. Martino, S., Prestininzi, A., & Romeo, W. R. (2014). Earthquake-induced ground failures in Italy from a reviewed database. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (In press).Google Scholar
  51. Martino, S., & Scarascia Mugnozza, G. (2005). The role of the seismic trigger in the Calitri landslide (Italy): Historical reconstruction and dynamic analysis. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25, 933–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mazzanti, P., & Bozzano, F. (2011). Revisiting the February 6th 1783 Scilla (Calabria, Italy) landslide and tsunami by numerical simulation. Marine Geophysical Research, 32(1–2), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Méric, O., Garambois, S., Malet, J. P., Cadet, H., Guéguen, P., & Jongmans, D. (2007). Seismic noise-based methods for soft-rock landslide characterization. Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, 178(2), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Murphy, W., Petley, D. N., Bommer, J. J., & Mankelow, J. M. (2002). Seismological uncertainty in the assessment of slope stability during earthquakes. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of RTRI, 30(1), 25–33.Google Scholar
  56. Newmark, N. M. (1965). Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique, 15(2), 139–159. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paraskevopoulos, E., Panagiotopoulos, C. G., & Manolis, G. D. (2010). Imposition of time-dependent boundary conditions in FEM formulations for elastodynamics: crytical assessments of penalty-type methods. Computational Mechanics45(2–3), 157–166.Google Scholar
  58. Petley, D. (2012). Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geology, 40(10), 927–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rathje, E. M., & Bray, J. D. (2000). Nonlinear coupled seismic sliding analysis of earth structures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 126(11), 1002–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rathje, E. M., Abrahamson, N. A., & Bray, J. D. (1998). Simplified frequency content estimates of earthquake ground motions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 124(2), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rathje, E. M., & Antonakos, G. (2010). Recent advances in predicting earthquake-induced sliding displacements of slopes. In Proceedings of Fifth International Conference of Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics (pp. 1–9), May 24–29, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  62. Rodriguez, C. E., Bommer, J. J., & Chandler, R. J. (1999). Earthquake-induced landslides: 1980–1997. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake, 18, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodríguez-Peces, J., Azañón, J. M., García-Mayordomo, J., Yesares, J., Troncoso, E., & Tsige, M. (2011). The Diezma landslide (A-92 motorway, Southern Spain): History and potential for future reactivation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 70, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Romeo, R. (2000). Seismically induced landslide displacements: A predictive model. Engineering Geology, 58(3–4), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruttener, E. (1999). Seismic hazard assessment in Armenia. Natural Hazards, 18, 227–236.Google Scholar
  66. Sassa, K. (1996). Prediction of earthquake induced landslides. In K. Senneset (Ed.), Landslides (pp. 115–132). Rotterdam: Balkema.Google Scholar
  67. Seed, H. B. (1979). Soil liquefaction and cyclic mobility evaluation for level ground during earthquakes. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE, 105(GT2), 102–155.Google Scholar
  68. Sepulveda, S. A., Murphy, W., Jibson, R. W., & Petley, D. N. (2005). Seismically induced rock slope failures resulting from topographic amplification of strong ground motions: The case of Pacoima Canyon, California. Engineering Geology, 80, 336–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. SESAME Working Group. (2004). Guidelines for the implementation of the h/v spectral ratio tecnique on ambient vibration measurements, processing and interpretation. http://sesame-fp5.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr/Delivrables/Del-D23-HV_User_Guidelines.pdf.
  70. Strenk, P. M., & Wartman, J. (2011). Uncertainty in seismic slope deformation model predictions. Engineering Geology, 122, 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang, K. L., & Lin, M. L. (2011). Initiation and displacement of landslide induced by earthquake—a study of shaking table model slope test. Engineering Geology, 122, 106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth Sciences and Research Center for Geological Risks (CERI)“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations