Skip to main content

Key Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: An Empirical Evidence from Spain

  • Chapter
Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility

Abstract

Although 43 % of Spanish enterprises consider CSR to be valuable to their organizations, only 15.5 % systematically implement Social Responsibility initiatives (Forética (2011). The evolution of social responsibility among Spanish business.).

In light of this low level of implementation, the aim of this paper is to explore key CSR initiatives implemented by Spanish enterprises and their evolution over the last years. Previous literature has focused on the empirical analyses about CSR initiatives in a specific group of organizations, according to their size or their profit or nonprofit purpose. Therefore, the main contribution of this research is to advance in knowledge about the implementation of CSR initiatives in Spain conducting an exploratory analysis and focusing on three main groups of organizations: small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), companies listed on the Madrid Stock Exchange and included on the IBEX35 index, and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Taking into account the differences between the three groups, this paper seeks to show whether these organizations are dealing with the same CSR initiatives, which of them are the most and which are the least implemented and how CSR policies should be orientated to promote CSR initiatives.

Our results show that most initiatives are focused on working conditions or environmental protection. Employees’ health and safety programs, plans for environmental protection and for energy efficiency, and gender equality and work-life balance, constitute the most common practices among Spanish companies (generally implemented by 60 % of companies). However, there are also initiatives undertaken less frequently (less than 15 % of companies), such as monitoring CSR in the supply chain, elaborating codes of conduct, and drafting CSR reports.

Focusing on Spanish enterprises listed on the IBEX35, we were able to discover how Spanish companies have enjoyed the greatest increases in environmental performance, social performance and corporate governance performance scores since 2002, as compared with the major other economies in Europe (such as the UK, France and Germany) using the Datastream database.

As far as NGOs are concerned, although most of them comply with most of the principles of the Lealtad Foundation Guide, a significant number of NGOs does not fully comply with the principles regarding the governance of the organization, plurality in financing and monitoring the use of funds.

In conclusion, results from this exploratory study show that, despite the great effort to implement CSR initiatives in Spanish companies and the increase in such initiatives, there are still some challenges to face, such as the efficiency of Corporate Governance policies and the difficulties small enterprises face when implementing these initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Díaz and García (2015) for a review of political initiatives to promote CSR in Spain .

  2. 2.

    This is known as “Silent Social Responsibility ”.

  3. 3.

    This sample is representative of Spanish businesses located across the geographical area of the study, distributed proportionately according to sectors of activity and company size (number of employees).

  4. 4.

    Information available on the Lealtad Foundation ’s website, September 2014.

References

  • Andrés, P. A., Cruz, N. M., & Romero-Merino, E. (2004). El gobierno de las sin gobierno. Universia Business Review, 4, 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrés, P. A., Cruz, N. M., & Romero-Merino, M. E. (2006). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Empirical evidence from nongovernmental development organizations in Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 588–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., & Gui, B. (2003). The theory of nonprofit organizations revisited. In H. K. Anheier & A. Ben-Ner (Eds.), Study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 3–27). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Callen, J. L., Klein, A., & Tinkelman, D. (2003). Board composition, committees and organizational efficiency: The case of nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(4), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanna, J. M., & Martínez, J. L. (2003). La eficacia en el gobierno de las entidades no lucrativas. Harvard Deusto Business Review, 117, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celma, D. M., García, E., & Coenders, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility in human resource management: An analysis of common practices and their determinants in Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(2), 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespy, C. T., & Miller, V. V. (2011). Sustainability reporting: A comparative study of NGOs and MNCs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(5), 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Castro, M. (2005). La Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas, o un nuevo concepto de empresa. Revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, 53, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, B., & García, R. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: Current and future perspectives in Spain. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, & M. S. Fifka (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe: United in sustainable diversity (pp. 413–434). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurobarometer. (2013). Public opinion in the European Union. Brusseles: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisman, R., & Hubbard, G. (2003). Endowments, governance, and the nonprofit form. The governance of not-for-profit organizations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forética. (2011). The evolution of social responsibility among Spanish Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Lealtad. (2010). Evaluación de los Principios de Transparencia y Buenas Prácticas de las ONGs. Report elaborated by the Lealtad Foundation, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación Lealtad. (2013). Las ONG españolas ante la crisis (2007–2013). Análisis de la evolución de las ONG de la Guía de la Transparencia. Report elaborated by the Lealtad Foundation, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Alvarez, I. (2008). Analysis of social information as a measure of the ethical behavior of Spanish firms. Management Decision, 46(4), 580–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Mainar, I., & Marcuello, C. (2007). Members, volunteers, and donors in nonprofit organizations in Spain. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 100–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2003). Introduction. In E. Glaeser (Ed.), The governance of not-for-profit organizations (pp. 1–44). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godos-Díez, J. L., & Fernández-Gago, R. (2011). ¿Cómo se percibe la dirección socialmente responsable por parte de los altos directivos de empresas en España? Universia Business Review, 29, 32–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammann, E., Habisch, A., & Pechlaner, H. (2009). Values that create value: Socially responsible business practices in SMEs – empirical evidence from German companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R. D., & Renz, D. O. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Administration Review, 64(6), 694–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, J., Larrán, M., & Martínez, D. (2012). Relación entre responsabilidad social y performance en las pequeñas y medianas empresas: Revisión bibliográfica. Cuadernos de Gestión, 13(2), 39–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamili, D., Zanhour, M., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Peculiar strengths and relational attributes of SMEs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 355–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2004). A critique of conventional CSR theory: An SME perspective. Journal of General Management, 29(4), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1994). Self-interest, altruism, incentives, and agency theory. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 7(2), 40–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kechiche, A., & Sopartnot, R. (2012). CSR within SMEs: Literature review. International Business Research, 5(7), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2011). International survey of corporate responsibility reporting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín, L., & Rubio, A. (2008). ¿Moda o factor competitivo? Un estudio empírico de responsabilidad social corporativa en PYME. ICE. Tribuna de Economía, 842, 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneva, J. M., & Hernández, J. C. (2009). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa e información de sostenibilidad en la PYME. Revista Internacional de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa, 1(2), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo, D., & Lozano, J. M. (2006). SMEs and CSR: An approach to CSR in their own words. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 227–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, K., & Oster, S. (2005). Does the structure and composition of the board matter? The case of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 21, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OCSR. (2012). Cultura, políticas y prácticas de responsabilidad de las empresas del IBEX 35. In T. Perdiguero, & A. García-Reche (dir.). Observatorio de la Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F., Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2007). CSR strategies of SMEs and large firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reverte, C. (2014). The new Spanish corporate social responsibility strategy 2014–2020: A crucial step forward with new challenges ahead. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, M. D. M. G., Pérez, M. D. C. C., & Godoy, M. L. (2012). Responsabilidad social y transparencia on-line de las ONG: análisis del caso español. CIRIEC-España, Revista de Economía Pública, Social y Cooperativa, 74, 207–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Merino, E., Azofra-Palenzuela, V., & Andrés-Alonso, P. D. (2008). El Gobierno de las fundaciones en España: patronatos sin patrones. Universia Business Review, 18, 86–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Tencati, A. (2009). Formal vs. informal CSR strategies: Evidence from Italian micro, small, medium-sized, and large firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(Suppl 2), 339–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Anheier, H., Toepler, R. L. S. S., Sokolowski, W., & Associates. (1999). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore: Center for Civil Society Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spain. (2014). Estrategia Española de Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas. Available at: http://www.empleo.gob.es/es/sec_trabajo/RSE.pdf. Accessed on October 29, 2014.

  • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19, 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, P., Torres, D., Guix, B., & Rodríguez, M. P. (2005). La responsabilidad social de las organizaciones no lucrativas. Barcelona: Centro de recursos del Observatorio del Tercer Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, A. (2006). Social and environmental responsibility in small and medium enterprises in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Belén Díaz Díaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex 4.1. Principles of the Lealtad Foundation ’s Guide of Transparency and Good Practices

Annex 4.1. Principles of the Lealtad Foundation ’s Guide of Transparency and Good Practices

Principle

Subprinciple

1

Operation and regulation of the governing body

A

The governing body shall consist of a minimum of 5 members

B

The governing body shall meet at least 2 times a year, with more than 50 % of the members of the governing body attending physically or by videoconference

C

All members of the governing body attend, in person or by videoconference, at least one meeting a year

D

Regarding members of the governing body, their names, professions, public office and kinship, and affinity with other members of the governing body and the management team of the organization shall be made public. The curriculum vitae of the members of the management team shall be made public. The organization will publish the relationships that exist between members of the governing body and the suppliers and co-organizers of the activity

E

Only a limited number of members of the governing body may receive income of any kind, coming from both the specific organization and other related entities. This percentage will be less than 40 % of the members

F

The membership of the governing body shall be renewed on a regular basis

G

There will be mechanisms approved by the governing body to prevent conflicts of interest within the governing body mechanisms. These mechanisms will be made public

2

Clarity and advertising of the social end

A

The social order is well defined. It must identify its field of activity and the public to which it is addressed

B

All activities undertaken by the organization will aim at achieving the social order, so that the organization does not carry out activities that are not explicitly covered in the Statutes

C

The social order will be known by all members of the organization, including volunteers, and will be easily accessible to the public

3

Planning and monitoring the activity

A

There will be a strategic plan or an annual plan that encompasses the entire organization with quantifiable objectives, schedules, and responsibilities. Objectives related to the project area shall be made public

B

Planning will need to be approved by the governing body

C

Over the past 3 years programs have followed a specific line of work

D

They will have formally defined systems for the control and internal monitoring of activities and beneficiaries. These will be approved by the governing body

E

The organization shall prepare monitoring and final reports in support of projects, which will be available to funders

F

The organization will have criteria and a project selection processes and counterparties approved by the governing body

4

Communication and faithful image of information

A

Advertising campaigns, fundraising and public information, will faithfully reflect the objectives and the reality of the organization. Furthermore, they will not mislead

B

At least once a year donors and partners will be informed about the organization’s activities

C

To communicate effectively, an e-mail address and a working website is required, with information on all activities of the organization and it must be updated at least once a year

D

The organization will make available, upon request, the annual report of activities and the annual financial report. The annual activity report and financial statements with the corresponding audit report will be accessible through the website

5

Transparency in funding

A

The tasks of capturing private and public funds, costs and annual revenue (donations, partners, and other contributions), will be made public

B

Details on the funds of the major funders, both public and private, shall be made public, and the amounts contributed by them

C

The allocation of proceeds to the activity each year, properly documented, will be known

D

If personal data are requested, the organization shall include the relevant information for the current legislation on personal data through its data collection means. The organization has registered its files of partners and individual donors in the Data Protection Agency

E

There will be selection criteria for companies and collaborators approved by the governing body

F

The agreements for the transfer of the company logo to companies and institutions must be formalized in writing. The clauses of logo transfer will not be confidential

6

Plurality in financing

A

The organization should diversify its funding from public and private funds. In any case, private income will be less than 10 % of total revenues

B

The organization will have a variety of external financiers favouring the continuity of the business. None of them shall provide more than 50 % of total revenues of the organization continuously for the past 2 years

7

Fund usage oversight

A

The distribution of operating costs grouped in the categories of Fundraising, Activity-Programs and Administration-Management, will be known. The use of funds, broken down by each project and activity line of the organization, will also be known

B

There will be a breakdown of the main suppliers and co-organizers of the activity. The organization will have a policy for the approval of costs, and a supplier selection criteria approved by the governing body

C

The organization shall prepare an annual budget for the following year, with corresponding explanatory report, and shall present the income and expenditure budgets of the previous year. The budget and the settlement will be approved by the governing body and shall be made public

D

The organization will not have excessive resources in the past 2 years

E

The organization will not submit an unbalanced financial structure over the last 3 years

F

Investments must meet certain requirements of reasonable care

G

In the event of having financial investments, the organization will have investment rules approved by the governing body

H

Investments in unlisted companies are related, and will directly assist the attainment of social order

I

The organization will respect the will of donors, and monitoring systems for targeted funds will be established. Funds from sponsorship will be considered as targeted funds

8

Presentation of financial statements and compliance with legal obligations

A

The organization certifies the fulfillment of legal obligations towards the Tax Administration, Social Security and Protectorate, or corresponding register

B

The organization shall prepare annual accounts in accordance with the General Accounting Plan for Non-Profit Entities, which will be subject to an external audit and approved by the General Assembly or the Board

9

Promotion of volunteering

A

The organization will promote the participation of volunteers in their activities

B

Those activities that are open to be engaged in by volunteers will be defined. The document in which such activities are designated will be public

C

There will be a training plan consistent with designated activities available to volunteers

D

Volunteers shall be insured in accordance with the risk posed by the activity performed

  1. Source: Own elaboration from information provided by the Lealtad Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Díaz Díaz, B., García Ramos, R., Baraibar Díez, E. (2016). Key Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: An Empirical Evidence from Spain. In: Idowu, S. (eds) Key Initiatives in Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics