From Privatization (of the Expansion Era) to De-privatization (of the Contraction Era): A National Counter-Trend in a Global Context

Abstract

This paper discusses Polish higher education with two pairs of concepts: expansion and contraction, and privatization and de-privatization. It focuses on what we term the “de-privatization” phenomenon, especially with regard to private sector growth and reliance on cost-sharing mechanisms in public higher education institutions, both currently in a fundamental retreat. De-privatization is a uniquely postcommunist European process today as only in postcommunist Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) had private higher education been on the rise for almost two decades, until a few years ago. Private higher education was stimulated by rapid expansion of access to higher education following the collapse of communism; not any more, though. De-privatization stems from aging populations and it is a demographically-driven public-private re-balancing process. Consequently, the current public-private dynamics in postcommunist Europe differ greatly from both Western European and global dynamics. However, the paper argues that Poland may ultimately resemble Western Europe where “normal” has always in the postwar period been predominantly public and tax-based higher education. The private sector – currently a “declining industry” in Poland and in CEE in Michael E. Porter’s terms – from a longer historical perspective can be viewed as merely a temporary phenomenon. The Polish state allowed it to flourish in the expansion period (1990–2005) to cover part of the rising costs of higher education from the private purse but in the contraction period (2006 and beyond), it is neither willing nor able to stop its gradual decline.

Keywords

De-privatization Privatization Poland Private higher education Public/private dynamics Expansion and contraction Changing demographics 

References

  1. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Antonowicz, D. (2012). External influences and local responses. Changes in Polish higher education 1990–2005. In M. Kwiek & P. Maassen (Eds.), National higher education reforms in a European context: Comparative reflections on Poland and Norway. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Antonowicz, D., & Godlewski, B. (2011). Demograficzne tsunami. Raport Instytutu Sokratesa na temat wpływu zmian demograficznych na szkolnictwo wyższe do 2020 roku. Warsaw: Instytut Sokratesa.Google Scholar
  4. Baranowska, A. (2011). Does horizontal differentiation make any difference? Heterogeneity of educational degrees and labor market entry in Poland. In I. Kogan, C. Noelke, & M. Gebel (Eds.), Making the transition: Education and labor market entry in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 216–239). Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bialecki, I., & Dabrowa-Szefler, M. (2009). Polish higher education in transition. Between policy making and autonomy. In D. Palfreyman & D. T. Tapper (Eds.), Structuring mass higher education. The role of elite institutions (pp. 183–199). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2013). Global status, inter-institutional stratification, and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic tobit analysis of ARWU position among US Universities. Minerva, 51(2), 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ernst and Young. (2010). Strategia rozwoju szkolnictwa wyzszego w Polsce do 2020 roku. Warsaw: Ernst and Young.Google Scholar
  8. Geiger, R. L. (1986). Private sectors in higher education. Structure, function, and change in eight countries. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  9. Geiger, R. L. (1988). Conference report: Privatization of higher education. Princeton: International Council for Educational Development.Google Scholar
  10. Goedegebuure, L., Lynn Meek, V., Kivinen, O., & Rinne, R. (1996). On diversity, differentiation and convergence. In V. Lynn Meek, L. Goedegebuure, O. Kivinen, & R. Rinne (Eds.), The mockers and mocked: Comparative perspectives on differentiation, convergence and diversity in higher education (pp. 2–13). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Gumport, P. J., Iannozzi, M., Shaman, S., & Zemsky, R. (1997). The United States country report: Trends in higher education from massification to post-massification. In Academic reforms in the world: Situation and perspective in the massification stage of higher education (RIHE international seminar reports no. 10, pp. 57–93). Rihe: Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  12. GUS. (2009). Population projection for Poland 2008–2035. Warsaw: GUS (Central Statistical Office).Google Scholar
  13. GUS. (2013). Higher education institutions and their finances in 2012. Warsaw: GUS (Central Statistical Office).Google Scholar
  14. Heller, D. E., & Callender, C. (Eds.). (2013). Student financing of higher education. A comparative perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Herbst, M., & Rok, J. (2014). Equity in an educational boom: Lessons from the expansion and marketisation of tertiary schooling in Poland. European Journal of Education, 49(3), 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang, F. (2012). Higher education from massification to universal access: A perspective from Japan. Higher Education, 63, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IBE. (2011). Spoleczenstwo w drodze do wiedzy. Raport o stanie edukacji 2010. Warsaw: Instytut Badan Edukacyjnych.Google Scholar
  18. Johnstone, D. B. (2007). Privatization in and of higher education. Paper presented at the international comparative higher education finance and accessibility project. Available from www.gse.buffalo.edu
  19. Johnstone, D. B. (2012). The costs of higher education. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), International higher education. An encyclopedia: Volume 1 (pp. 59–89). New York/London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Johnstone, D. B., & Marcucci, P. (2010). Financing higher education worldwide. Who pays? Who should pay? Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kogan, I., Noelke, C., & Gebel, M. (Eds.). (2011). Making the transition: Education and labor market entry in Central and Eastern Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kwiek, M. (2008). Accessibility and equity, market forces and entrepreneurship: Developments in higher education in Central and Eastern Europe. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kwiek, M. (2010). Creeping marketization: Where polish private and public higher education sectors meet. In R. Brown (Ed.), Higher education and the market (pp. 135–146). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Kwiek, M. (2011). Universities and knowledge production in Central Europe. In P. Temple (Ed.), Universities in the knowledge economy. Higher education organisation and global change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Kwiek, M. (2012a). Changing higher education policies: From the deinstitutionalization to the reinstitutionalization of the research mission in polish universities. Science and Public Policy, 39, 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwiek, M. (2012b). Universities, regional development and economic competitiveness: The polish case. In R. Pinheiro, P. Benneworth, & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 69–85). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kwiek, M. (2013a). Knowledge production in European Universities. States, markets, and academic entrepreneurialism. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Kwiek, M. (2013b). From system expansion to system contraction: Access to higher education in Poland. Comparative Education Review, 57(3 (Fall)), 553–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kwiek, M. (2014a). Structural changes in the polish higher education system (1990–2010): A synthetic view. European Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 266–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kwiek, M. (2014b). Changing higher education and welfare states in postcommunist Central Europe: New contexts leading to new typologies? Human Affairs, 24(1), 48–87.Google Scholar
  31. Kwiek, M. (2014c). The internationalization of the Polish academic profession. A European comparative approach. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60(5), 681–695.Google Scholar
  32. Levine, A. (2001). Privatization in higher education. Available from: www.nga.org
  33. Levy, D. C. (1986). ‘Private’ and ‘Public’: Analysis amid ambiguity in higher education. In D. C. Levy (Ed.), Private education. Studies in choice and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Levy, D. C. (1992). Private institutions of higher education. In B. R. Clark & G. Neave (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 1183–1194). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Levy, D. C. (2009). Growth and typology. In S. Bjarnason et al. (Eds.), A new dynamic: Private higher education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  36. Levy, D. C. (2011). Public policy for private higher education: A global analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 13(4), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levy, D. C. (2013). The decline of private higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marcucci, P. (2013). The politics of student funding policies from a comparative perspective. In D. E. Heller & C. Callender (Eds.), Student financing of higher education. A comparative perspective (pp. 9–31). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Marginson, S. (1997). Markets in education. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. Marginson, S. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53, 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morphew, C. C., & Eckel, P. D. (Eds.). (2009). Privatizing the public university. Perspectives from across the academy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  42. MoSHE. (2012). Projekt zalozen projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy – Prawo o szkolnictwie wyzszym oraz niektorych innych ustaw. Warsaw: Ministry of Science and Higher Education (mimeo).Google Scholar
  43. OECD. (2013). Education at a Glance 2013. OECD Indicatora. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  44. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  45. Priest, D. M., & St John, E. P. (Eds.). (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Salerno, C. (2004). Public money and private providers: Funding channels and national patterns in four countries. Higher Education, 48, 101–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Scott, P. (2007). Reflections on private higher education tendencies in Central and Eastern Europe. In S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in post-communist Europe. In search of legitimacy (pp. 299–316). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  48. Slantcheva, S., & Levy, D. C. (2007). Private higher education in post-communist Europe: In search of legitimacy. In S. Slantcheva & D. C. Levy (Eds.), Private higher education in post-communist Europe. In search of legitimacy (pp. 1–23). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the market. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Szczepanski, J. (1974). Higher education in Eastern Europe. New York: International Council for Educational Development.Google Scholar
  53. Szczepanski, J. (1978). Systems of higher education: Poland. New York: International Council of Educational Development.Google Scholar
  54. Taylor, B. J., Cantwell, B., & Slaughter, S. (2013). Quasi-markets in US higher education: Humanities emphasis and institutional revenues. Journal of Higher Education, 84(5), 675–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton, M. (2012). Privatising the public university. The case of law. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Trow, M. (2010). Problems in transition from elite to mass higher education. In M. Burrage (Ed.), Twentieth-century higher education. Elite to mass to universal (pp. 86–142). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2008). What is the impact of demography on higher education systems? A forward-looking approach for OECD countries. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.), Higher education to 2030. Volume 1: Demography (pp. 41–104). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang, L. (2014). The road to privatization of higher education in China. A new cultural revolution? Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wasielewski, K. (2013). Mlodziez wiejska na uniwersytecie – droga na studia, mechanizmy alokacji, postawy wobec studiow. Torun: UMK.Google Scholar
  60. Williams, G. (1996). The many faces of privatization. Higher Education Management, 8(3), 39–56.Google Scholar
  61. Yonezawa, A., & Kim, T. (2008). The future of higher education in the context of a shrinking students population: Policy challenges for Japan and Korea. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.), OECD, higher education to 2030. Volume 1. Demography (pp. 199–220). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PoznanPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations