Skip to main content

Water Transfers and Turkish Political Culture: Melen Case

  • Chapter
Water Politics and Political Culture
  • 428 Accesses

Abstract

Turkish water bureaucracy operates within a strictly technocratic-engineering framework that has a paternalistic view of its stakeholders. Chapter 4 demonstrated the main national character traits of this bureaucracy and its political culture. Turkish water bureaucracy decision-making occurs against this background in which deeply embedded social constructs negatively impact on the way in which water resources are managed and developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “It should be noted that the term “demand”, in the context of water resources management, generally means requirements, and is very rarely used in its traditional economic sense. Indeed, very rarely is the concept of demand elasticity explicitly considered within the water planning process per se. Consequently very little is known about constructing realistic demand functions under varying socio-economic considerations. Expressed differently, it means that emphasis so far has been on supply management -that is, increase in supply is considered to be virtually the only management alternative- rather than consideration of demand management”. See: Biswas (1983).

  2. 2.

    AuthoSenior SHW engineer also stated “the yeast factory has been undertaking some activities that blatantly pollutes Melen water. You need to go and ask farmers and fishermen what do they think of it and also ask the factory officials what they have been up to here.”

  3. 3.

    A recent quantitative social science study called ‘Environment in Turkey 2010’ by Ali Carkoglu and Ersin Kalaycioglu proved this further and provided evidence regarding the environmental sentiments of Turkish society.

References

  • Altinbilek D (2006) Water management in Istanbul. Inter J Water Resour Dev 22(2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas A (1983) Long distance water transfer: problems and prospects. In: Bisawas A, Dakang Z, Nickum JE, Changming L (eds) Long-distance water transfer: a Chinese case study and international experiences. United Nations University, Tycooly International, Ireland. http://unu.edu/publications/books/1980-1983/long-distance-water-transfer-a-chinese-case-study-and-international-experiences. Accessed 13 Feb 2012

  • Caulfield HP (1986) Viability of inter-basin, interstate/international transfers of water. Water Int 11(1):32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox WE (1999) Determining when interbasin water transfer is justified: criteria for evaluation. In: Proceedings at the international workshop on interbasin water transfer. UNESCO, Paris, pp 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings R (1974) Interbasin water transfers: a case study in Mexico. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies BR, Thoms M, Meador M (1992) An assessment of the ecological impacts of inter-basin water transfers, and their threats to river basin integrity and conservation. Aqua Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 2(4):325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Andrade JGP, Barbosa PSF, Souza LCA, Makino DL (2011) Inter-basin water transfers: the Brazilian experience and international case comparisons. Water Resour Manag 25:1915–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirci A, Butt A (2001) Historical overview and current trends in Istanbul’s water supply development. Globalisation and Water resources Development, AWRA/IWLRI International Specialty conference. http://www.awra.org/proceedings/dundee01/Documents/DemirciandButtfinal.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2011

  • Erturk A, Gurel M, Seker DZ, Ekdal A, Tavsan C, Ugurluoglu A, Tanik A, Ozturk I (2007) Design of decision support system tools for integrated protection and water quality management in Melen watershed. International Congress on River Basin Management, Antalya, Turkey, 22–24 Mar 2007. www2.dsi.gov.tr/english/congress2007/chapter_3/74.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2012

  • European Environment Agency (2009) Water resources across Europe –confronting water scarcity and drought. Schultz Grafisk, Copenhagen, p 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghassemi F, White I (2007) Inter-basin water transfer: case studies from Australia, United States, Canada, China, and India. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 22–36, 345

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Golubev GN, Biswas A (eds) (1985) Large-scale water transfers: emerging environmental and social issues. In: Large scale water transfers: emerging environmental and social experiences. UNEP: Tycooly Publishing, Oxford, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbo B, van der Zaag P (2002) Water losses and the political constraints to demand management: the case of the city of Mutare, Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 27:805–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, van der Zaag P (2008) Interbasin water transfers and integrated water resources management: where engineering, science and politics interlock. Phys Chem Earth 33(1–2):28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe CW, Easter KW (1971) Interbasin transfers of water: economic issues and impacts. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe CW, Lazo JK, Weber KR (1990) The economic impacts of agriculture-to-urban water transfers on the area of origin: a case study of the Arkansas River Valley in Colorado. Am Agr Econ Assoc 72(5):1200–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISKI. Melen Projesi Ikinci Asama: Mevcut Durum. http://www.iski.gov.tr/Web/statik.aspx?KID=1001143. Accessed 25 Feb 2012

  • Islar M (2012) Privatisation of hydropower development in turkey: a case of water grabbing? Water Altern 5(2):376–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel M, Lund JR (1995) Recent California water transfers: implications for water management. Nat Resour J 35(1):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonch-Clausen T (2004) Integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency plans by 2005: why, what and how? Global Water Partnership, Vast AB Stockholm, p 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya N, Karakaya I (2007) Havzalararasi Su Transferi: Hukuksal Acidan Degerlendirme. TMMOB 2. Su Politikalari Kongresi, pp 109–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichterman P, Cefai D (2006) The idea of political culture. In: Goodin RE, Tilly C (eds) The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 392–408

    Google Scholar 

  • London JB, Miley HW (1990) The inter-basin transfer of water: an issue of efficiency and equity. Water Intern 15:231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I. NTV’ye sorun TV interview with Celal Pir. http://arsiv.ntvmsnbc.com/news/394640.asp. Accessed 20 Apr 2010

  • Pittock J, Meng J, Geiger M, Chapagain AK (2009) Interbasin water transfers and water scarcity in a changing world: a solution or a pipedream. WWF Germany, Frankfurt, pp 13–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Radikal (2008) Melen Sevinci Kisa Surdu. http:/radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalDetayV3&ArticleID=894653&CategoryID=85. Accessed 21 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry, Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive (CED Yonetmeligi in Turkish), No. 25313. Published 16 Dec 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheumann W, Baumann V, Mueller AL, Mutschler D, Steiner S, Walenta T (2011) Environmental impact assessment in Turkish dam planning. In: Kibaroglu A, Schuemann W, Kramer A (eds) Turkey’s water policy. Springer, Berlin, p 153

    Google Scholar 

  • SHW (2007) DSI 14. Bolge Mudurlugu 2007 Yili Program Butce Toplantisi Takdim Raporu. SHW, Istanbul, pp 80–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaddon CD, Wishart MJ, Davies BR (1998) Some implications of inter-basin water transfers for river ecosystem functioning and water resources management in Southern Africa. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 1(2):159–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumer B, Ileri R, Samandar A, Sengorur B (2001) Buyuk Melen Kollarindaki Su Kalitesi (water quality in River Buyuk Melen and its branches). Ekoloji Cevre Dergisi 10(39):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatte CD (2007) Inter-Basin Water Transfer (IBWT) for the augmentation of water resources in India: a review of needs, plans, status and prospects. Water Resour Dev 23(4):709–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Under M. Melen Projesine Icerden Agir Elestiri: Melen Su Kaynaklarina Ihanet. Yeni Aktuel Dergisi. http://www.yeniaktuel.com.tr/tur101,111@2100.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2012

  • WWF Global Freshwater Programme (2007) Pipedreams: interbasin water transfers and water shortages. WWF Global Freshwater Programme, Zeist

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF-Turkey (2012) Havzalararasi Su Transferi Gorus Bildirisi, (Tasarimhane, Istanbul), 12. http://www.wwf.org.tr/pdf/WWF-Turkiye_HavzalarArasiSuTransferi.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2012

  • Yevjevich V (2001) Water diversions and interbasin water transfers. Water Int 26(3):342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oktem, O. (2016). Water Transfers and Turkish Political Culture: Melen Case. In: Water Politics and Political Culture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21479-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics