Advertisement

Understanding IoT Through the Human Activity: Analogical Interpretation of IoT by Activity Theory

  • Narae Kim
  • Sangwon LeeEmail author
  • Taehyun Ha
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 528)

Abstract

Currently Internet of Things (IoT) is one of the major issues in academia and industry. However, studies so far have tended to focus on technical aspects. The future technologies need to be developed in user perspectives because users center in connected situations based on IoT. As a part of addressing this issue, the present study proposes a conceptual model for the IoT process, which can be likened to a human activity process based on ‘Activity Theory (AT)’. Focusing on how people actually work in IoT situations, we attempt to draw an analogy between IoT and AT in terms of three interaction types among input device, sensor/network, task of IoT device, standard/protocol, and output device. The proposed model provides new viewpoint and direction for future research in IoT domains.

Keywords

Internet of Things (IoT) Activity theory (AT) User-centric Analogy analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Ministry of Education, South Korea, under the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project (No. 10Z20130000013) and Basic Science Research Program (No. NRF-2014R 1A 1A2054531).

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, M.J., Edmond, D., Ter Hofstede, A.H.: The application of activity theory to dynamic workflow adaptation issues (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandyopadhyay, D., Sen, J.: Internet of things: applications and challenges in technology and standardization. Wireless Pers. Commun. 58(1), 49–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bedny, G.Z., Harris, S.R.: The systemic-structural theory of activity: applications to the study of human work. Mind, cult. Act. 12(2), 128–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertelsen, O.W., Bødker, S.: Activity theory. HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, pp. 291–324 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of Things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuutti, K.: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, 17–44 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nardi, B.A.: Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitmore, A., Agarwal, A., Da Xu, L.: The internet of things—a survey of topics and trends. Inf. Syst. Front. 17(2), 261–274 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversityJongnoKorea

Personalised recommendations