Abstract
In the past several years, advances in technology and the development of social media have drastically transformed the Internet from a place where individuals can not only obtain information and nurture existing social networks but also develop new relationships when forming or joining communities of interest. Within the realm of healthcare, these developments have created a wide range of opportunities and challenges for both patients and providers. Given the vast means by which patients utilize social media, it is our responsibility as psychosocial providers to better understand why and how social media are used on matters of health. This chapter highlights the various types of social media and provides discussion on how these different media can be used by pediatric oncology patients and their families. Within this framework we then discuss the opportunities and ethical challenges social media present to us as psychosocial providers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Terry CL, Helft PR (2011) The patient–doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med 26(10):1168–1174
Chaudhry A, Glode LM, Gillman M, Miller RS (2012) Trends in twitter use by physicians at the american society of clinical oncology annual meeting, 2010 and 2011. J Oncol Pract 8(3):173–178
Colineau N, Paris C (2010) Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients. New Rev Hypermedia Multimedia J 16(1–2):141–160
Dizon DS, Graham D, Thompson MA et al (2012) Practical guidance: the use of social media in oncology practice. J Oncol Pract 8(5):e114–e124
Fox S, Dugan M (2013) Health online 2013. Pew Internet and American Life Project. www.pewInternet.org/reports/2013/Health-Online. Accessed 10 Sep 2014
Giordano C, Giordano C (2011) Health professions students’ use of social media. J Allied Health 40(2):78–81
Guseh JS, Brendel RW, Brendel DH (2009) Medical professionalism in the age of online social networking. J Med Ethics 35:584–586
Hede K (2012) Online networks present challenges, opportunities for Oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(15):1115–1116
Hollis R, Morgan S (2001) The adolescent with cancer: at the edge of no man’s land. Lancet 2:43–48
Hurley M, Smith C (2007) Patients’ blogs: do doctors have anything to fear? BMJ 335:645–646
Internet World Stats (2014) The Internet big picture: world Internet users and population stats. Available via http://www.Internetworldstats.com/stats.htm. Accessed 10 Sep 2014
Johnson GJ, Ambrose PJ (2006) Neo-tribes: the power and potential of online communities in health care. Commun ACM 49(1):107–113
Last B, Van Veldhuizen A (1996) Information about diagnosis and prognosis related to anxiety and depression in children with cancer aged 8–16 years. Eur J Cancer Care 32(2):290–294
Lehavot K, Ben-Zeev D, Neville RE (2012) Ethical considerations and social media: a case of suicidal postings on Facebook. J Dual Diag 8(4):341–346
Lehavot K, Barnett JE, Powers D (2010) Psychotherapy, professional relationships, and ethical considerations in the MySpace generation. Prof Psychol Res Pr 41(2):160–166
McKenna MP, D’Alessandro D (2011) Social networks and the practice of medicine: harnessing powerful opportunities. J Pediatr 158(1):1–2
Nabi RL, Prestin A, So J (2013) Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress and well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 16(10):721–728
Shirky C (2008) “Here comes health” in keynote speeach at the Health 2.0 Conference: User-Generated Healthcare, San Francisco, 22 Oct 2008. Available via: http://health2con.com/2009/07/19/clay-shirky-keynote-here-comes-health/. Accessed 10 Sep 2014
Suris JC, Michaud PA, Viner R (2004) The adolescent with a chronic condition: part 1. Developmental issues. Arch Dis Child 89:938–942
Suzuki LK, Kato PM (2003) Psychosocial support for patients in pediatric oncology: the influences of parents, school, peers and technology. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 20:159–174
Terry M (2009) Twittering healthcare: social media and medicine. Telemed J E Health 15(6):507–510
Treadgold CL, Kuperberg A (2010) Been there, done that, wrote the blog: the choices and challenges of supporting adolescents and young adults with cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(32):4842–4849
Tunick RA, Brand, SR (2015) Social media. In: Quick reference for pediatric oncology clinicians: the psychiatric and psychological dimensions of pediatric cancer symptom management, 2nd edn 2015:345–356
Tunick RA, Mednick L (2008) Commentary: electronic communication in the pediatric setting - dilemmas associated with patient blogs. J Pediatr Psychol 34(5):585–587
Tunick RA, Mednick L, Conroy C (2011) A snapshot of child psychologists’ social media activity: professional and ethical practice implications and recommendations. Prof Psychol Res Pract 42(6):440–447
Wiener L, Crum C, Grady C, Merchant M (2012) To friend or not to friend: the use of social media in clinical oncology. J Oncol Pract 8(2):103–106
Zebrack B (2008) Information and service needs for young adult cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 16:1353–1360
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zadeh, S., Tunick, R. (2016). Social Media Use in Pediatric Oncology: Tweets, Blogs, and Boundaries. In: Abrams, A., Muriel, A., Wiener, L. (eds) Pediatric Psychosocial Oncology: Textbook for Multidisciplinary Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21374-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21374-3_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21373-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21374-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)