Skip to main content

Social Attention, Social Presence, and the Dual Function of Gaze

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Many Faces of Social Attention

Abstract

Research on human attention has traditionally been limited to rather spartan laboratory investigations. In the present chapter, recent work that has introduced an element of complexity to this picture, by examining how social stimuli and social contexts influence attention (i.e., social attention research), is reviewed. Evidence demonstrating that staple social attentional phenomena can change drastically under different social conditions (e.g., looking at images of people vs. real people) is taken to suggest a need to consider more seriously the interaction between social presence and social attention. Research on social presence, both real and implied, is briefly reviewed, and recent work directly investigating the influence of social presence on gaze behavior and the implications of this work for understanding social attention are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argo, J. J., Dahl, D. W., & Manchanda, R. V. (2005). The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 207–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, L., Darke, P. R., & Schaller, M. (2005). No one wants to look cheap: Trade-offs between social disincentives and the economic and psychological incentives to redeem coupons. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412–414.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergum, B. O., & Lehr, D. J. (1963). Effects of authoritarianism on vigilance performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 75–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Human social attention: A new look at past, present and future investigations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 118–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Vision Research, 49, 2992–3000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(6), 1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. J. (1973). Social facilitation of laughter in children. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 528–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chawarska, K., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2003). Automatic attention cueing through eye movement in 2-year old children with autism. Child Development, 74, 1108–1122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, J. T., Tracey, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coutrot, A., & Guyader, N. (2014). How saliency, faces, and sound influence gaze in dynamic social scenes. Journal of Vision, 14, 5, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, D. W., Manchanda, R. V., & Argo, J. J. (2001). Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dashiell, J. F. (1930). An experimental analysis of some group effects. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 25(2), 190–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekström, M. (2012). Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment. Experimental Economics, 15, 530–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 172–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, M. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foulsham, T., & Sanderson, L. A. (2013). Look who’s talking? Sound changes gaze behaviour in a dynamic social scene. Visual Cognition, 21, 922–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117, 319–331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foulsham, T., Walker, E., & Kingstone, A. (2011). The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment. Vision Research, 51, 1920–1931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francey, D., & Bergmüller, R. (2012). Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good. PloS One, 7(5), e37397.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2013). What affects social attention? Social presence, eye contact and autistic traits. PLoS One, 8(1), e53286. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053286.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it!: Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R., et al. (2012a). Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7245–7250.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geen, R. G. (1985). Evaluation apprehension and response withholding in solution of anagrams. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 293–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in public place. New York: The free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, C. P., Roth, D. A., & Polivy, J. (2003). Effects of the presence of others on food intake: A normative interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 873–886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, A. (2009). Taking a real look at social attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 19, 52–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., Ristic, J., Friesen, C. K., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Attention, researchers! It is time to take a look at the real world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 176–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, K. E. W., Foulsham, T., Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 5548–5553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidlaw, K. E. W., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2012). A new look at social attention: Orienting to the eyes is not (entirely) under volitional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 38, 1132–1143. doi:10.1037/a0027075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimgruber, K. L., Shaw, A., Santos, L. R., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Young children are more generous when others are aware of their actions. PloS One, 7(10), e48292.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, J., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Monsters are people too. Biology Letters, 9, 20120850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, X. (2005). How does shopping with others influence impulsive purchasing? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasiopoulos, E., Risko, E. F., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Wearable computing: Will it make people prosocial? British Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1111/bjop.12080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D., Harper, Z., Kidson, A., Stone, R., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Bateson, M. (2013). The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: It’s not how much you give, it’s being seen to give something. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okada, T., Sato, W., Murai, T., et al. (2003). Eye gaze triggers visuospatial attentional shift in individuals with autism. Psychologia, 46, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olk, B., Cameron, B., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Enhanced orienting effects: Evidence for an interaction principle. Visual Cognition, 16, 979–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessin, J., & Husband, R. W. (1933). Effects of social stimulation on human maze learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., & Nettle, D. (2012). Eye images increase charitable donations: Evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology, 118(11), 1096–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putz, V. R. (1975). The effects of different modes of supervision on vigilance behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 157–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratner, R. K., & Kahn, B. E. (2002). The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Eyes wide shut: Implied social presence, eye tracking and attention. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73, 291–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K. E. W., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Social attention with Real vs. Reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ethological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(143), doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J. & Kingstone, A. (2005). Taking control of reflexive social attention. Cognition, 94(3), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J., & Kingstone, A. (2006). Attention to arrows: Pointing to a new direction. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1921–1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic, J. & Kingstone A. (2009). Rethinking attentional development: Reflexive and volitional orienting in children and adults. Developmental Science, 12, 298–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, M. D., & Krysko, K. M. (2008). Eye direction, not movement direction, predicts attention shifts in those with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism Development and Disorders, 38, 1958–1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satow, K. L. (1975). Social approval and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Social anxiety and self-presentation: A conceptualization model. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Senju, A., Tojo, Y., Dairoku, H.., et al (2004). Reflexive orienting in response to eye gaze and an arrow in children with and without autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 445–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. L., & Clark, H. H. (1993). On the course of answering questions. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, L. E. (1925). The effect of a small audience upon eye-hand coordination. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 20, 142–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uziel, L. (2007). Individual differences in the social facilitation effect: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 579–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompay, T. J., Vonk, D. J., & Fransen, M. L. (2009). The eye of the camera effects of security cameras on prosocial behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Fillers as signals. Evidence from a question-answering paradigm. Discourse Processes, 51, 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, R. F., Miller, F. G., Langan, C. J., & Cecil, J. S. (1971). Social facilitation of attitude change. Psychonomic Science, 22, 113–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Duval, S. (1971). Opinion change and performance facilitation as a result of objective self-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. W.-L., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Looking while eating: The importance of social context to social attention. Scientific Reports, 3, 2356. doi:10.1038/ srep02356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, D. W.-L., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2014). Natural gaze signaling in a social context. Evolution & Human Behavior, 35, 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Kingstone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nasiopoulos, E., Risko, E., Kingstone, A. (2015). Social Attention, Social Presence, and the Dual Function of Gaze. In: Puce, A., Bertenthal, B. (eds) The Many Faces of Social Attention. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21368-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics